Utility of Recovery Room vs Post-Operative Day 1 Radiographs Following Shoulder Arthroplasty.

The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Taylor Den Hartog, Maria Bozoghlian, Garrett Christensen, Daniel Meeker, James V Nepola, Brendan M Patterson
{"title":"Utility of Recovery Room vs Post-Operative Day 1 Radiographs Following Shoulder Arthroplasty.","authors":"Taylor Den Hartog, Maria Bozoghlian, Garrett Christensen, Daniel Meeker, James V Nepola, Brendan M Patterson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative radiographs may be performed on different timelines after shoulder arthroplasty. Radiographs obtained in the post-operative recovery unit (PACU) are often of poorer quality. The purpose of the current study was to explore and compare the quality of PACU radiographs and radiographs performed in the radiology suite on post-operative Day 1 (POD1), as well as determine their impact on changes in post-operative management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our series included 50 consecutive anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) for which post-operative radiographs were obtained in the PACU and 50 consecutive TSA for which post-operative radiographs were obtained in the radiology suite on POD 1. TSA radiographs were blinded and reviewed by 3 authors and graded on their quality using criteria described using previously published methods. The weighted kappa was used to describe the intra-rater agreement and inter-rater agreement between two raters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference in age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities between cohorts. Intra-observer reliability was moderate to substantial with weighted kappa values of 0.65±0.07 (p<0.001), 0.58±0.09 (p<0.001), and 0.67±0.07 (p<0.001). Inter-observer reliability was moderate to substantial with weighted kappa values of 0.605±0.07 (p<0.001), 0.66±0.07 (p<0.001), and 0.65±0.08 (p<0.001). When assessing quality of radiographs, 30% of radiographs obtained in PACU were deemed quality while 57% of radiographs obtained in the radiology suite were deemed quality (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-operative radiographs in the PACU do not alter patient management and are often inadequate to serve as baseline radiographs. Conversely, radiographs obtained in the radiology suite are of higher quality and can serve as a superior baseline radiograph. <b>Level of Evidence: IV</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94233,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"99-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11195874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative radiographs may be performed on different timelines after shoulder arthroplasty. Radiographs obtained in the post-operative recovery unit (PACU) are often of poorer quality. The purpose of the current study was to explore and compare the quality of PACU radiographs and radiographs performed in the radiology suite on post-operative Day 1 (POD1), as well as determine their impact on changes in post-operative management.

Methods: Our series included 50 consecutive anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties (TSA) for which post-operative radiographs were obtained in the PACU and 50 consecutive TSA for which post-operative radiographs were obtained in the radiology suite on POD 1. TSA radiographs were blinded and reviewed by 3 authors and graded on their quality using criteria described using previously published methods. The weighted kappa was used to describe the intra-rater agreement and inter-rater agreement between two raters.

Results: There was no difference in age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities between cohorts. Intra-observer reliability was moderate to substantial with weighted kappa values of 0.65±0.07 (p<0.001), 0.58±0.09 (p<0.001), and 0.67±0.07 (p<0.001). Inter-observer reliability was moderate to substantial with weighted kappa values of 0.605±0.07 (p<0.001), 0.66±0.07 (p<0.001), and 0.65±0.08 (p<0.001). When assessing quality of radiographs, 30% of radiographs obtained in PACU were deemed quality while 57% of radiographs obtained in the radiology suite were deemed quality (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Post-operative radiographs in the PACU do not alter patient management and are often inadequate to serve as baseline radiographs. Conversely, radiographs obtained in the radiology suite are of higher quality and can serve as a superior baseline radiograph. Level of Evidence: IV.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩关节置换术后恢复室与术后第 1 天 X 射线照相的实用性。
背景:肩关节置换术后可能需要在不同的时间段进行术后X光检查。在术后恢复室(PACU)获得的射线照片通常质量较差。本研究旨在探讨和比较术后第 1 天 (POD1) 在 PACU 和放射科病房拍摄的射线照片的质量,并确定它们对术后管理变化的影响:我们的系列研究包括 50 例连续的解剖型全肩关节置换术(TSA)和 50 例连续的全肩关节置换术(TSA),前者的术后射线照相是在 PACU 进行的,后者的术后射线照相是在 POD1 当天在放射室进行的。TSA X 光片由 3 位作者进行盲法审核,并采用之前发表的方法中描述的标准对其质量进行分级。加权卡帕用于描述两位评分者之间的评分内一致性和评分间一致性:结果:不同组群之间在年龄、性别、体重指数和合并症方面没有差异。观察者内部的可靠性为中度到高度,加权卡帕值为 0.65±0.07(p 结论:观察者内部的可靠性为中度到高度,加权卡帕值为 0.65±0.07(p):PACU 中的术后射线照片不会改变患者的管理,而且通常不足以作为基线射线照片。相反,在放射室获得的射线照片质量较高,可作为较好的基线射线照片。证据等级:四级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pain Management for Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Systematic Review. Peri-Operative Management of Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Report of Current Practices from the Anchor Group, Supporting Literature, and Areas for Future Investigation. Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Very Young Children - A Case Report and Modern Review. Predicting Septic Arthritis in the Setting of Crystalline Arthropathy in the Native Joint Using Laboratory Data. Predictive Factors for Intraoperative Determination for the Need of Femoral Osteochondroplasty After Periacetabular Osteotomy for Acetabular Dysplasia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1