Life Cycle Assessment of an Avocado: Grown in South Africa—Enjoyed in Europe

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Management Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1007/s00267-024-02009-w
Sheldon A. Blaauw, André Broekman, James W. Maina, Wynand J. v. d. M. Steyn, William A. Haddad
{"title":"Life Cycle Assessment of an Avocado: Grown in South Africa—Enjoyed in Europe","authors":"Sheldon A. Blaauw,&nbsp;André Broekman,&nbsp;James W. Maina,&nbsp;Wynand J. v. d. M. Steyn,&nbsp;William A. Haddad","doi":"10.1007/s00267-024-02009-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Food production is known to have significant environmental impacts, with the main contributors residing in the farming and transportation life cycle phases. Of the various food products transported around the world, avocados have increasingly gained attention as a high-commodity superfood. Avocados require specific climatic and agricultural conditions for farming, with the most fertile land and conditions located outside Europe. Consequently, most avocados consumed in Europe are imported over vast geographical distances, with little information available to quantify the environmental impacts of this imported superfood. This paper aims to present the most detailed life cycle assessment results of an avocado cultivated, grown and harvested in the Limpopo Province of South Africa and exported to the European market for sale and consumption. A life cycle assessment was developed for the farming, harvesting, handling, packaging, ripening, transportation, and carbon sequestration potential of the avocado, and it was used to conduct a holistic life cycle assessment. Input data was obtained through an 18-month data collection campaign across the relevant stakeholders. A baseline ‘business-as-usual’ scenario is focused on throughout this study, and scope for optimisation is identified for each life cycle phase where applicable, accompanied by uncertainty analyses. Results show a total carbon input of 904.85 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonne. Mitigating this, 521.88 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonne is offset, resulting in a net carbon footprint of 382.97 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonne with uncertainty ranges of −23.22 to +58.69 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonne, normalised to 57.45 g CO<sub>2</sub>e/avocado grown in South Africa and sold in Europe. The environmental impacts of the avocado industry under consideration are largely mitigated by the “nature first” philosophy of the farming and logistics enterprises, which have made significant investments in reducing emissions. Sensitivity analyses indicate that implementing large-scale renewable energy, using alternative packaging instead of cardboard, and selling avocados unripened could further enable the farming enterprise to achieve Net Zero objectives. These measures could reduce baseline emissions from 382.97 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonne to a theoretical −68.54 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/tonne, representing a 117.9% decrease. Although this study does not quantify climate change impacts, qualitative analyses suggest that climate change will have a net negative effect on the avocado industry in South Africa. These regions, typically located in micro-climates, are projected to become wetter and warmer, adversely affecting crop phenology, pest control, road conditions, management complexity, farmer livelihoods, and food security. The study recommends large-scale implementation of the optimisation strategies identified to achieve Net Zero objectives and the development of proactive climate change mitigation strategies to enhance the resilience of avocado supply chains to future stressors. These insights are crucial for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and consumers aiming to promote sustainability in the avocado market.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":543,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Management","volume":"74 5","pages":"989 - 1005"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00267-024-02009-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Food production is known to have significant environmental impacts, with the main contributors residing in the farming and transportation life cycle phases. Of the various food products transported around the world, avocados have increasingly gained attention as a high-commodity superfood. Avocados require specific climatic and agricultural conditions for farming, with the most fertile land and conditions located outside Europe. Consequently, most avocados consumed in Europe are imported over vast geographical distances, with little information available to quantify the environmental impacts of this imported superfood. This paper aims to present the most detailed life cycle assessment results of an avocado cultivated, grown and harvested in the Limpopo Province of South Africa and exported to the European market for sale and consumption. A life cycle assessment was developed for the farming, harvesting, handling, packaging, ripening, transportation, and carbon sequestration potential of the avocado, and it was used to conduct a holistic life cycle assessment. Input data was obtained through an 18-month data collection campaign across the relevant stakeholders. A baseline ‘business-as-usual’ scenario is focused on throughout this study, and scope for optimisation is identified for each life cycle phase where applicable, accompanied by uncertainty analyses. Results show a total carbon input of 904.85 kg CO2e/tonne. Mitigating this, 521.88 kg CO2e/tonne is offset, resulting in a net carbon footprint of 382.97 kg CO2e/tonne with uncertainty ranges of −23.22 to +58.69 kg CO2e/tonne, normalised to 57.45 g CO2e/avocado grown in South Africa and sold in Europe. The environmental impacts of the avocado industry under consideration are largely mitigated by the “nature first” philosophy of the farming and logistics enterprises, which have made significant investments in reducing emissions. Sensitivity analyses indicate that implementing large-scale renewable energy, using alternative packaging instead of cardboard, and selling avocados unripened could further enable the farming enterprise to achieve Net Zero objectives. These measures could reduce baseline emissions from 382.97 kg CO2e/tonne to a theoretical −68.54 kg CO2e/tonne, representing a 117.9% decrease. Although this study does not quantify climate change impacts, qualitative analyses suggest that climate change will have a net negative effect on the avocado industry in South Africa. These regions, typically located in micro-climates, are projected to become wetter and warmer, adversely affecting crop phenology, pest control, road conditions, management complexity, farmer livelihoods, and food security. The study recommends large-scale implementation of the optimisation strategies identified to achieve Net Zero objectives and the development of proactive climate change mitigation strategies to enhance the resilience of avocado supply chains to future stressors. These insights are crucial for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and consumers aiming to promote sustainability in the avocado market.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牛油果的生命周期评估:南非种植,欧洲享用。
众所周知,食品生产会对环境产生重大影响,而造成影响的主要因素集中在种植和运输的生命周期阶段。在全球运输的各种食品中,鳄梨作为一种高商品量的超级食品日益受到关注。牛油果的种植需要特定的气候和农业条件,最肥沃的土地和条件位于欧洲以外。因此,欧洲消费的大部分鳄梨都是远距离进口的,几乎没有信息可以量化这种进口超级食品对环境的影响。本文旨在介绍在南非林波波省种植、生长和收获并出口到欧洲市场销售和消费的牛油果的最详细生命周期评估结果。针对牛油果的种植、收获、处理、包装、成熟、运输以及碳固存潜力制定了生命周期评估,并利用该评估进行整体生命周期评估。输入数据是通过为期 18 个月的数据收集活动从相关利益方获得的。整个研究以 "一切照旧 "的基线情景为重点,并酌情确定了生命周期各阶段的优化范围,同时进行了不确定性分析。结果显示,总碳输入为 904.85 千克二氧化碳/吨。其中,521.88 千克二氧化碳/吨被抵消,净碳足迹为 382.97 千克二氧化碳/吨,不确定性范围为 -23.22 至 +58.69 千克二氧化碳/吨,归一化为 57.45 克二氧化碳/南非种植并在欧洲销售的鳄梨。由于种植和物流企业秉承 "自然第一 "的理念,在减少排放方面进行了大量投资,因此牛油果产业对环境的影响在很大程度上得到了缓解。敏感性分析表明,实施大规模可再生能源、使用替代包装而非纸板、销售未催熟的牛油果可进一步使种植企业实现净零排放目标。这些措施可将基准排放量从 382.97 千克二氧化碳/吨降至理论上的-68.54 千克二氧化碳/吨,降幅达 117.9%。尽管本研究没有量化气候变化的影响,但定性分析表明,气候变化将对南非的鳄梨产业产生净负面影响。这些地区通常位于小气候区,预计会变得更加潮湿和温暖,从而对作物物候、病虫害防治、道路状况、管理复杂性、农民生计和食品安全产生不利影响。该研究建议大规模实施已确定的优化战略,以实现净零目标,并制定积极的气候变化减缓战略,以增强鳄梨供应链对未来压力的适应能力。这些见解对旨在促进牛油果市场可持续发展的政策制定者、行业利益相关者和消费者至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Management
Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Management offers research and opinions on use and conservation of natural resources, protection of habitats and control of hazards, spanning the field of environmental management without regard to traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal aims to improve communication, making ideas and results from any field available to practitioners from other backgrounds. Contributions are drawn from biology, botany, chemistry, climatology, ecology, ecological economics, environmental engineering, fisheries, environmental law, forest sciences, geosciences, information science, public affairs, public health, toxicology, zoology and more. As the principal user of nature, humanity is responsible for ensuring that its environmental impacts are benign rather than catastrophic. Environmental Management presents the work of academic researchers and professionals outside universities, including those in business, government, research establishments, and public interest groups, presenting a wide spectrum of viewpoints and approaches.
期刊最新文献
Application of High-pressure Carbon Dioxide in Japanese Anchovy Waste Recycling by Enzymatic Hydrolysis. Biogeographic Considerations for Fish-Based Indices of Stream Health in Regions with High Species Richness and Endemism: A Perspective from the Southeastern US. Cleansing our waters: how riffle fish communities in the Spring River of Kansas responded to pollution legislation, mining remediation, and improved water quality. Benchmarking Riparian Vegetation Quality in Recovering Rivers: Implications for Management of Novel Ecosystems. Exploring System Context Contributing to Emerging REDD+ Collaborative Governance Regime in Ghana: Stakeholders Perceptions at the National Level.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1