Text message questionnaires for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Cesarean section-A feasibility study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1111/aas.14477
Patricia Duch, Christoffer Calov Jørgensen, Helene Korvenius Nedergaard
{"title":"Text message questionnaires for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures after Cesarean section-A feasibility study.","authors":"Patricia Duch, Christoffer Calov Jørgensen, Helene Korvenius Nedergaard","doi":"10.1111/aas.14477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate pain relief with moderate to severe pain remains a challenge after cesarean section and may significantly impair postoperative recovery. However, detailed assessment on the timing of severe pain, opioid consumption, influence on activities such as mobilization, breastfeeding, and caring for the infant are difficult to conduct, especially after discharge. Short message services (SMS)-based questionnaires may offer a low-cost way of providing such data but with the risk of insufficient response rates. We assessed the feasibility of collecting detailed, prospective data on postoperative pain and recovery during the initial hours and days following cesarean section using SMS-based questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective Danish single-center cohort study involving elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia with fentanyl and bupivacaine. The postoperative pain regimen consisted of paracetamol, NSAID and oral morphine by request. Patients received an SMS-based questionnaire at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, as well as on days 7 and 30.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome: </strong>Response rate and time from receiving the SMS to completion of the questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Secondary outcomes: </strong>Opioid consumption and Patient Reported Outcomes Measures on pain and recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From December 2022 to June 2023; 100 patients were included. The response rate was 78% at 6 h postoperatively, decreasing to 63% at 24 h. The median response time from receiving to answering the SMS-based questionnaire at 6 h after cesarean section was 23 min (IQR 2-72), decreasing to 20 min (IQR 2-78) after 24 h. Severe pain, corresponding to a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score >6, was reported by 57% (95% CI 65-84) at 6 h, decreasing to 28% (95% CI 34-58) at 24 h. Median opioid consumption within the first 24 h was 30 mg (IQR 20-50).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMS-based questionnaires on Patient Reported Outcome Measures are a feasible and cost-effective way of prospectively collecting frequent data with acceptable response rates, even shortly after cesarean section. Secondarily 66% of patients reported severe pain during the first 24 h following cesarean section, with the highest pain scores within the initial 12 h. Future studies should focus on optimizing pain-management within this timeframe.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14477","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inadequate pain relief with moderate to severe pain remains a challenge after cesarean section and may significantly impair postoperative recovery. However, detailed assessment on the timing of severe pain, opioid consumption, influence on activities such as mobilization, breastfeeding, and caring for the infant are difficult to conduct, especially after discharge. Short message services (SMS)-based questionnaires may offer a low-cost way of providing such data but with the risk of insufficient response rates. We assessed the feasibility of collecting detailed, prospective data on postoperative pain and recovery during the initial hours and days following cesarean section using SMS-based questionnaires.

Methods: Prospective Danish single-center cohort study involving elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia with fentanyl and bupivacaine. The postoperative pain regimen consisted of paracetamol, NSAID and oral morphine by request. Patients received an SMS-based questionnaire at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, as well as on days 7 and 30.

Primary outcome: Response rate and time from receiving the SMS to completion of the questionnaires.

Secondary outcomes: Opioid consumption and Patient Reported Outcomes Measures on pain and recovery.

Results: From December 2022 to June 2023; 100 patients were included. The response rate was 78% at 6 h postoperatively, decreasing to 63% at 24 h. The median response time from receiving to answering the SMS-based questionnaire at 6 h after cesarean section was 23 min (IQR 2-72), decreasing to 20 min (IQR 2-78) after 24 h. Severe pain, corresponding to a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score >6, was reported by 57% (95% CI 65-84) at 6 h, decreasing to 28% (95% CI 34-58) at 24 h. Median opioid consumption within the first 24 h was 30 mg (IQR 20-50).

Conclusion: SMS-based questionnaires on Patient Reported Outcome Measures are a feasible and cost-effective way of prospectively collecting frequent data with acceptable response rates, even shortly after cesarean section. Secondarily 66% of patients reported severe pain during the first 24 h following cesarean section, with the highest pain scores within the initial 12 h. Future studies should focus on optimizing pain-management within this timeframe.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖宫产术后患者报告结果的短信问卷--一项可行性研究。
背景:中度至重度疼痛缓解不充分仍是剖宫产术后的一个难题,可能会严重影响术后恢复。然而,详细评估剧烈疼痛的时间、阿片类药物的消耗量、对活动的影响(如移动、母乳喂养和照顾婴儿)是很难进行的,尤其是在出院后。基于短信服务(SMS)的调查问卷可能是提供此类数据的一种低成本方法,但存在回复率不足的风险。我们评估了使用基于短信的调查问卷收集剖宫产术后最初几小时和几天内术后疼痛和恢复情况的详细前瞻性数据的可行性:丹麦单中心前瞻性队列研究,涉及使用芬太尼和布比卡因进行脊髓麻醉的择期剖宫产手术。术后镇痛方案包括扑热息痛、非甾体抗炎药和按需口服吗啡。患者在术后 6、12、18、24 和 48 小时以及术后第 7 天和第 30 天接受了基于 SMS 的问卷调查:次要结果:阿片类药物消耗量和患者报告:次要结果:阿片类药物的消耗量以及患者对疼痛和恢复情况的报告结果(Patient Reported Outcomes Measures):从 2022 年 12 月到 2023 年 6 月,共纳入 100 名患者。剖宫产术后 6 小时,从收到短信到回答问卷的中位响应时间为 23 分钟(IQR 2-72),24 小时后降至 20 分钟(IQR 2-78)。6小时内有57%(95% CI 65-84)的患者报告有剧烈疼痛,即数字评分量表(NRS)评分大于6分,24小时后这一比例降至28%(95% CI 34-58):基于短信的患者报告结果指标问卷是一种可行且具有成本效益的前瞻性数据收集方式,即使在剖宫产术后不久也能获得可接受的回复率。其次,66% 的患者报告在剖宫产术后 24 小时内有剧烈疼痛,最初 12 小时内疼痛评分最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and etiology of ventilator-associated pneumonia during the COVID-19 pandemic in Denmark: Wave-dependent lessons learned from a mixed-ICU. Lack of correlation between biomarkers and acute kidney injury after pediatric cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: Should be look for something else? Quantity: More markers, more merit Serious adverse events reporting in recent randomised clinical trials in intensive care medicine – A methodological study protocol In-hospital cardiac arrest registries and aetiology of cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1