Increasing multimorbidity and the evolving peri-operative model of care

IF 6.9 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1111/anae.16367
Cathriona Murphy
{"title":"Increasing multimorbidity and the evolving peri-operative model of care","authors":"Cathriona Murphy","doi":"10.1111/anae.16367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I read with interest the recent study by the STARSurg and EuroSurg Collaboratives examining the association between multimorbidity and postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major surgery [<span>1</span>]. The evolution of peri-operative medicine to date has been varied and unstandardised. Surprisingly, while this analysis did not show a difference in mortality or complications among multimorbid patients who received pre-operative assessment and those who did not, there is a large body of evidence that supports the individual and systemic benefits of achieving best practice in peri-operative care [<span>1, 2</span>]. Hence, it raises the questions; what is the anaesthetist's role in the peri-operative pathway and what are the persistent challenges and positive enablers for the creation of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary and collaborative care model in response to the growing complexity and multimorbidity of surgical populations?</p><p>Providing high-quality care before, during and after surgery reduces complications, and improves outcomes, efficiency and patient experience [<span>2</span>]. Peri-operative care programmes have been well implemented in Australia and the USA, but in the UK and Ireland, there is a lack of consistency despite several initiatives to create a patient-centred, integrated programme including the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) initiative that started in 2012 [<span>2, 3</span>]. In this post-pandemic period where elective surgery waiting times are at a record high, establishing widespread, multidisciplinary peri-operative medical teams should be key in lowering morbidity and mortality, hospital stay duration and need for critical care after surgery.</p><p>The advancement of modern healthcare means that both patients and procedures are becoming increasingly complex, amplifying the benefit of a sustainable, cost-effective, peri-operative care pathway. Furthermore, with unprecedented demand for anaesthetic input in new environments outside of the traditional operating theatre setting, the expanding demand for anaesthesia emphasises the importance of workforce planning, training and clinical education. A survey on challenges to improving peri-operative care showed that 76% of anaesthetists felt they had no time to engage and 66% felt they were understaffed [<span>4</span>]. A recent Health Service Executive report said that, by March 2023, Ireland had much fewer consultant anaesthetists than other countries, at 10.4 per 100,000 people [<span>5</span>]. These figures highlight the current limitations and the urgency to address these obstacles and incorporate them into recruitment, workforce planning and training schemes.</p><p>Although it is clear there has been a positive change in the attitude towards peri-operative medicine in recent years, there is an abundance of work that still needs to be done to develop a model of care with increased multidisciplinary collaboration to provide exemplary patient care [<span>4</span>]. Anaesthesia trainees should learn more about the role of the peri-operative physician. Training bodies should endeavour to increase clinical exposure, integrate high-fidelity collaborative simulation scenarios as well as promote divergent training pathways to ameliorate this multidimensional role.</p><p>Advances in modern surgical techniques, coupled with a growing, ageing, multimorbid patient population, require a peri-operative care model that is multidisciplinary, evidence-based, cost-effective and focused on improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"79 12","pages":"1377-1378"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16367","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16367","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I read with interest the recent study by the STARSurg and EuroSurg Collaboratives examining the association between multimorbidity and postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major surgery [1]. The evolution of peri-operative medicine to date has been varied and unstandardised. Surprisingly, while this analysis did not show a difference in mortality or complications among multimorbid patients who received pre-operative assessment and those who did not, there is a large body of evidence that supports the individual and systemic benefits of achieving best practice in peri-operative care [1, 2]. Hence, it raises the questions; what is the anaesthetist's role in the peri-operative pathway and what are the persistent challenges and positive enablers for the creation of a comprehensive, multidisciplinary and collaborative care model in response to the growing complexity and multimorbidity of surgical populations?

Providing high-quality care before, during and after surgery reduces complications, and improves outcomes, efficiency and patient experience [2]. Peri-operative care programmes have been well implemented in Australia and the USA, but in the UK and Ireland, there is a lack of consistency despite several initiatives to create a patient-centred, integrated programme including the Getting It Right First Time (GIRFT) initiative that started in 2012 [2, 3]. In this post-pandemic period where elective surgery waiting times are at a record high, establishing widespread, multidisciplinary peri-operative medical teams should be key in lowering morbidity and mortality, hospital stay duration and need for critical care after surgery.

The advancement of modern healthcare means that both patients and procedures are becoming increasingly complex, amplifying the benefit of a sustainable, cost-effective, peri-operative care pathway. Furthermore, with unprecedented demand for anaesthetic input in new environments outside of the traditional operating theatre setting, the expanding demand for anaesthesia emphasises the importance of workforce planning, training and clinical education. A survey on challenges to improving peri-operative care showed that 76% of anaesthetists felt they had no time to engage and 66% felt they were understaffed [4]. A recent Health Service Executive report said that, by March 2023, Ireland had much fewer consultant anaesthetists than other countries, at 10.4 per 100,000 people [5]. These figures highlight the current limitations and the urgency to address these obstacles and incorporate them into recruitment, workforce planning and training schemes.

Although it is clear there has been a positive change in the attitude towards peri-operative medicine in recent years, there is an abundance of work that still needs to be done to develop a model of care with increased multidisciplinary collaboration to provide exemplary patient care [4]. Anaesthesia trainees should learn more about the role of the peri-operative physician. Training bodies should endeavour to increase clinical exposure, integrate high-fidelity collaborative simulation scenarios as well as promote divergent training pathways to ameliorate this multidimensional role.

Advances in modern surgical techniques, coupled with a growing, ageing, multimorbid patient population, require a peri-operative care model that is multidisciplinary, evidence-based, cost-effective and focused on improving patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日益增多的多病症和不断演变的围手术期护理模式。
我饶有兴趣地阅读了 STARSurg 和 EuroSurg 协作组织最近开展的一项研究,该研究探讨了大手术患者的多病症与术后死亡率之间的关系[1]。迄今为止,围手术期医学的发展各不相同,也没有统一标准。令人惊讶的是,虽然这项分析并未显示接受术前评估和未接受术前评估的多病患者在死亡率或并发症方面存在差异,但大量证据表明,实现围手术期护理的最佳实践对个人和系统都有益处[1, 2]。因此,我们不禁要问:麻醉师在围手术期护理过程中的作用是什么?为应对手术人群日益增长的复杂性和多病症性,在创建全面、多学科协作护理模式方面存在哪些长期挑战和积极因素?围手术期护理计划在澳大利亚和美国得到了很好的实施,但在英国和爱尔兰,尽管采取了多项措施来创建以患者为中心的综合计划,包括 2012 年开始实施的 "第一次就做对"(GIRFT)计划,但仍缺乏一致性[2, 3]。现代医疗保健的发展意味着患者和手术都变得越来越复杂,这使得可持续、具有成本效益的围手术期护理路径的益处更大。此外,在传统手术室以外的新环境中,对麻醉投入的需求前所未有,麻醉需求的不断扩大强调了劳动力规划、培训和临床教育的重要性。一项关于改善围手术期护理所面临挑战的调查显示,76% 的麻醉师认为他们没有时间参与,66% 的麻醉师认为他们人手不足[4]。卫生服务执行局最近的一份报告称,到 2023 年 3 月,爱尔兰的麻醉顾问医师人数将远低于其他国家,每 10 万人中只有 10.4 名麻醉顾问医师[5]。尽管近年来人们对围术期医学的态度显然发生了积极的变化,但仍有大量工作需要完成,以发展一种加强多学科合作的护理模式,为患者提供模范护理[4]。麻醉受训人员应该更多地了解围手术期医生的作用。现代外科技术的进步,加上日益增长的、老龄化的、多病的患者群体,需要一种多学科的、以证据为基础的、具有成本效益的、以改善患者预后为重点的围手术期护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
期刊最新文献
Conscious sedation vs. general anaesthesia for the peri-operative management of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a reply. Interpreting the afternoon disadvantage: accounting for mediation, weighting and secular trends: a reply. Chronic pain after day-case surgery: the next challenge in the prevention of chronic post-surgical pain. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery (POPPY): baseline data from day surgery practice in the UK. Patient-reported outcomes, postoperative pain and pain relief after day-case surgery (POPPY): chronic post-surgical pain prevalence and associations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1