Effect of Activated Charcoal on Mavacamten Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Participants

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1007/s40256-024-00659-z
Samira Merali, Manting Chiang, Caroline Sychterz, Longfei Chao, Tara Simmons, Yiru Xu, Alice Zhao, Massimo Attanasio, Bindu Murthy, Vidya Perera
{"title":"Effect of Activated Charcoal on Mavacamten Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Participants","authors":"Samira Merali,&nbsp;Manting Chiang,&nbsp;Caroline Sychterz,&nbsp;Longfei Chao,&nbsp;Tara Simmons,&nbsp;Yiru Xu,&nbsp;Alice Zhao,&nbsp;Massimo Attanasio,&nbsp;Bindu Murthy,&nbsp;Vidya Perera","doi":"10.1007/s40256-024-00659-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To assess the effect of activated charcoal on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of mavacamten when administered 2 h or 6 h after mavacamten dosing.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, healthy adults were randomized into three groups to receive mavacamten 15 mg alone or mavacamten 15 mg plus activated charcoal 50 g administered either 2 h or 6 h after mavacamten dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from plasma concentration–time data using noncompartmental methods.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 45 participants randomized, 37 completed the study. When activated charcoal was administered 2 h after mavacamten dosing, mavacamten absorption and exposure were reduced compared with when mavacamten was administered alone: the area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 72 h (AUC<sub>0–72</sub>) and area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>INF</sub>) were reduced by 14% and 34%, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (<i>C</i><sub>max</sub>) was also slightly lower when activated charcoal was administered 2 h after mavacamten dosing than with mavacamten alone. Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for mavacamten alone and mavacamten plus activated charcoal administered 6 h after mavacamten dosing.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Activated charcoal was successful in reducing mavacamten absorption and exposure when administered as soon as possible after identification of a need for adsorption (2 h after mavacamten dosing). No change in exposure was observed when activated charcoal was administered 6 h after mavacamten dosing.</p><h3>Clinical Trial Registration</h3><p>NCT05320094</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"24 4","pages":"569 - 575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11233281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-024-00659-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effect of activated charcoal on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of mavacamten when administered 2 h or 6 h after mavacamten dosing.

Methods

In this open-label, randomized, parallel-group study, healthy adults were randomized into three groups to receive mavacamten 15 mg alone or mavacamten 15 mg plus activated charcoal 50 g administered either 2 h or 6 h after mavacamten dosing. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from plasma concentration–time data using noncompartmental methods.

Results

Of the 45 participants randomized, 37 completed the study. When activated charcoal was administered 2 h after mavacamten dosing, mavacamten absorption and exposure were reduced compared with when mavacamten was administered alone: the area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 72 h (AUC0–72) and area under the concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCINF) were reduced by 14% and 34%, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was also slightly lower when activated charcoal was administered 2 h after mavacamten dosing than with mavacamten alone. Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar for mavacamten alone and mavacamten plus activated charcoal administered 6 h after mavacamten dosing.

Conclusions

Activated charcoal was successful in reducing mavacamten absorption and exposure when administered as soon as possible after identification of a need for adsorption (2 h after mavacamten dosing). No change in exposure was observed when activated charcoal was administered 6 h after mavacamten dosing.

Clinical Trial Registration

NCT05320094

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活性炭对健康参与者体内马伐康坦药代动力学的影响
目的评估在服用马伐卡滕 2 小时或 6 小时后服用活性炭对马伐卡滕单剂量药代动力学的影响:在这项开放标签、随机、平行组研究中,健康成人被随机分为三组,分别接受单独服用马伐卡滕 15 毫克或在服用马伐卡滕 2 小时或 6 小时后服用马伐卡滕 15 毫克加 50 克活性炭。药代动力学参数采用非室方法从血浆浓度-时间数据中得出:在 45 名随机参与者中,37 人完成了研究。在服用马伐卡滕2小时后再服用活性炭,与单独服用马伐卡滕相比,马伐卡滕的吸收和暴露均有所减少:0至72小时的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-72)和从0时间外推至无穷大的浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUCINF)分别减少了14%和34%。在服用马伐卡滕 2 小时后再服用活性炭时,最大血浆浓度(Cmax)也略低于单独服用马伐卡滕时。单独服用马伐卡滕和在服用马伐卡滕 6 小时后服用马伐卡滕加活性炭的药代动力学特征相似:在确定需要吸附后(服用马伐卡滕后 2 小时)尽快给药,活性炭可成功减少马伐卡滕的吸收和暴露。在服用马伐卡滕 6 小时后再服用活性炭,则未观察到暴露量的变化:临床试验注册:NCT05320094。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
期刊最新文献
Cost Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction between Cilostazol and Rosuvastatin in Healthy Participants. Use of Direct Anticoagulants in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Review of the Current Evidence and Emerging Perspectives. Impact of Antibacterials on the Quality of Anticoagulation Control in Patients Initiating Warfarin Therapy. Sacubitril-Valsartan Lowers Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence and Left Atrial Volume Post-catheter Ablation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1