Effect of probiotic supplementation on the gut microbiota in very preterm infants: a systematic review.

Kayleigh Vievermanns, Thomas H Dierikx, Nathalie J Oldenburger, Faridi S Jamaludin, Hendrik J Niemarkt, Tim G J de Meij
{"title":"Effect of probiotic supplementation on the gut microbiota in very preterm infants: a systematic review.","authors":"Kayleigh Vievermanns, Thomas H Dierikx, Nathalie J Oldenburger, Faridi S Jamaludin, Hendrik J Niemarkt, Tim G J de Meij","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2023-326691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is increasing evidence that probiotic supplementation in very preterm infants decreases the risk of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis and mortality. The underlying mechanisms, including effects on the gut microbiota, are largely unknown. We aimed to systematically review the available literature on the effects of probiotic supplementation in very preterm infants on gut microbiota development.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neonatal intensive care unit.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Premature infants.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Probiotic supplementation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Gut microbiota.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1046 articles were screened, of which 29 were included. There was a large heterogeneity in study design, dose and type of probiotic strains, timepoints of sample collection and analysing techniques. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli were the most used probiotic strains. The effects of probiotics on alpha diversity were conflicting; however, beta diversity was significantly different between probiotic-supplemented infants and controls in the vast majority of studies. In most studies, probiotic supplementation led to increased relative abundance of the supplemented strains and decreased abundance of genera such as <i>Clostridium</i>, <i>Streptococcus</i>, <i>Klebsiella</i> and <i>Escherichia</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Probiotic supplementation to preterm infants seems to increase the relative abundance of the supplemented strains with a concurrent decrease of potentially pathogenic species. These probiotic-induced microbial alterations may contribute to the decreased risk of health complications such as NEC. Future trials, including omics technologies to analyse both microbiota composition and function linked to health outcomes, are warranted to identify the optimal mixture and dosing of probiotic strains.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023385204.</p>","PeriodicalId":8177,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","volume":" ","pages":"57-67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2023-326691","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There is increasing evidence that probiotic supplementation in very preterm infants decreases the risk of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), sepsis and mortality. The underlying mechanisms, including effects on the gut microbiota, are largely unknown. We aimed to systematically review the available literature on the effects of probiotic supplementation in very preterm infants on gut microbiota development.

Design: A systematic review in Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science.

Setting: Neonatal intensive care unit.

Patients: Premature infants.

Intervention: Probiotic supplementation.

Main outcome measures: Gut microbiota.

Results: A total of 1046 articles were screened, of which 29 were included. There was a large heterogeneity in study design, dose and type of probiotic strains, timepoints of sample collection and analysing techniques. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli were the most used probiotic strains. The effects of probiotics on alpha diversity were conflicting; however, beta diversity was significantly different between probiotic-supplemented infants and controls in the vast majority of studies. In most studies, probiotic supplementation led to increased relative abundance of the supplemented strains and decreased abundance of genera such as Clostridium, Streptococcus, Klebsiella and Escherichia.

Conclusions: Probiotic supplementation to preterm infants seems to increase the relative abundance of the supplemented strains with a concurrent decrease of potentially pathogenic species. These probiotic-induced microbial alterations may contribute to the decreased risk of health complications such as NEC. Future trials, including omics technologies to analyse both microbiota composition and function linked to health outcomes, are warranted to identify the optimal mixture and dosing of probiotic strains.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023385204.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充益生菌对早产儿肠道微生物群的影响:系统综述。
目的:越来越多的证据表明,早产儿补充益生菌可降低坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)、败血症和死亡率。其潜在机制,包括对肠道微生物群的影响,大多尚不清楚。我们的目的是系统回顾有关早产儿补充益生菌对肠道微生物群发育影响的现有文献:设计:在 Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 中进行系统性综述:患者:早产儿干预措施:补充益生菌:干预措施:补充益生菌:结果结果:共筛选出 1046 篇文章,其中 29 篇被收录。在研究设计、益生菌株的剂量和类型、样本采集的时间点和分析技术方面存在很大的异质性。双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌是使用最多的益生菌株。益生菌对阿尔法多样性的影响相互矛盾;但在绝大多数研究中,补充益生菌的婴儿与对照组之间的贝塔多样性有显著差异。在大多数研究中,补充益生菌导致补充菌株的相对丰度增加,而梭状芽孢杆菌、链球菌、克雷伯氏菌和埃希氏菌等菌属的丰度降低:结论:早产儿补充益生菌似乎增加了补充菌株的相对丰度,同时减少了潜在的致病菌种。这些由益生菌引起的微生物变化可能有助于降低NEC等健康并发症的风险。未来的试验,包括分析与健康结果相关的微生物群组成和功能的 omics 技术,都需要确定益生菌菌株的最佳混合物和剂量:CRD42023385204。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.
期刊最新文献
Facilitators and barriers to the practice of neonatal family integrated care from the perspective of healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Azithromycin for eradication of Ureaplasma and prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Outcomes of extremely preterm infants who participated in a randomised trial of dopamine for treatment of hypotension (the HIP trial) at 2 years corrected age. A novel human milk fortifier supports adequate growth in very low birth weight infants: a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial. Minimisation of blood sampling losses in preterm neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1