Utilization and related harms of systemic glucocorticosteroids for atopic dermatitis: claims data analysis.

IF 11 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY British Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1093/bjd/ljae250
Kristina Hagenström, Theresa Klinger, Katharina Müller, Charlotte Willers, Matthias Augustin
{"title":"Utilization and related harms of systemic glucocorticosteroids for atopic dermatitis: claims data analysis.","authors":"Kristina Hagenström, Theresa Klinger, Katharina Müller, Charlotte Willers, Matthias Augustin","doi":"10.1093/bjd/ljae250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Systemic glucocorticosteroids (SGCs) are used in the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), but are not recommended for long-term use because they are associated with severe side-effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to characterize the utilization and potentially negative effects of SGC use for AD in German statutory health insurance (SHI) claims data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of a large nationwide SHI dataset. SGC drug prescriptions and incidences of predefined comorbidities after drug initiation that were known to be potentially harmful side-effects were analysed. SGC use was quantified by (-definition 1) the number of quarters with at least one SGC prescription and (definition 2) the defined daily doses (DDD). Comparisons were adjusted for age, sex and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AD prevalence was 4.07% in 2020 (4.12% women, 3.42% men). During this period 9.91% of people with AD were prescribed SGCs compared with 5.54% in people without AD (P < 0.01). Prescribing of SGCs was significantly higher in women (10.20% vs. 9.42% in men, P < 0.01) and in the elderly. AD and SGC prevalence varied regionally. In a 3-year follow-up period, 58% of people with AD receiving a SGC were prescribed SGCs in > one quarter and 15% in > six quarters. The odds of developing osteoporosis [odds ratio (OR) 3.90 -(definition 1) and 1.80 (definition 2)] and diabetes [OR 1.90 (definition 1) and 1.38 (definition 2)] were significantly higher in people with AD on SGCs, especially in the frequently prescribed group compared with the rarely prescribed group, regardless of quantified use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A considerable number of people with AD in Germany are prescribed long-term SGCs. The onset of medical conditions known to be harmful effects of steroids was significantly more frequent in those who were frequently prescribed SGCs, indicating the need for optimized healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9238,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Systemic glucocorticosteroids (SGCs) are used in the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), but are not recommended for long-term use because they are associated with severe side-effects.

Objectives: This study aimed to characterize the utilization and potentially negative effects of SGC use for AD in German statutory health insurance (SHI) claims data.

Methods: Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of a large nationwide SHI dataset. SGC drug prescriptions and incidences of predefined comorbidities after drug initiation that were known to be potentially harmful side-effects were analysed. SGC use was quantified by (-definition 1) the number of quarters with at least one SGC prescription and (definition 2) the defined daily doses (DDD). Comparisons were adjusted for age, sex and morbidity.

Results: The AD prevalence was 4.07% in 2020 (4.12% women, 3.42% men). During this period 9.91% of people with AD were prescribed SGCs compared with 5.54% in people without AD (P < 0.01). Prescribing of SGCs was significantly higher in women (10.20% vs. 9.42% in men, P < 0.01) and in the elderly. AD and SGC prevalence varied regionally. In a 3-year follow-up period, 58% of people with AD receiving a SGC were prescribed SGCs in > one quarter and 15% in > six quarters. The odds of developing osteoporosis [odds ratio (OR) 3.90 -(definition 1) and 1.80 (definition 2)] and diabetes [OR 1.90 (definition 1) and 1.38 (definition 2)] were significantly higher in people with AD on SGCs, especially in the frequently prescribed group compared with the rarely prescribed group, regardless of quantified use.

Conclusions: A considerable number of people with AD in Germany are prescribed long-term SGCs. The onset of medical conditions known to be harmful effects of steroids was significantly more frequent in those who were frequently prescribed SGCs, indicating the need for optimized healthcare.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性糖皮质激素治疗特应性皮炎的使用情况及相关危害:索赔数据分析。
背景和目的:全身性糖皮质激素(SGCs)可用于特应性皮炎(AD)的短期治疗,但由于会产生严重的副作用,因此不建议长期使用。本研究旨在从德国法定医疗保险(SHI)理赔数据中了解特应性皮炎患者使用糖皮质激素的情况及其潜在的负面影响:患者和方法:对全国范围内的大型SHI数据集进行横截面和纵向分析。分析了SGC药物处方和用药后出现被称为潜在有害副作用的预定义合并症的情况。SGC药物的使用通过以下两个方面进行量化:1)至少有一个SGC处方的季度数;2)定义的每日剂量(DDD)。在进行比较时,对年龄、性别和发病率进行了调整:2020 年,注意力缺失症的发病率为 4.07%(女性为 4.12%,男性为 3.71%)。在此期间,9.91%的注意力缺失症患者被处方 SGCs,而非注意力缺失症患者的处方 SGCs 比例为 5.54%(p 1 季度和 15% > 6 季度)。无论量化使用情况如何,使用sGCS的AD患者患骨质疏松症(几率比3.95[方法1]和1.80[方法2])和糖尿病(几率比1.90[方法1]和1.38[方法2])的几率明显较高,尤其是在经常用药组与很少用药组之间:结论:在德国,有相当多的注意力缺失症患者长期服用 SGCs。结论:在德国,有相当多的注意力缺失症患者长期服用类固醇类药物,类固醇类药物的有害影响在 "经常处方 "类固醇类药物的患者中更为常见,这表明需要优化医疗保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Dermatology
British Journal of Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
3.90%
发文量
1062
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Dermatology (BJD) is committed to publishing the highest quality dermatological research. Through its publications, the journal seeks to advance the understanding, management, and treatment of skin diseases, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of the mutational landscape of cutaneous leiomyoma confirms FH as a driver gene and identifies targeting purine metabolism as a potential therapeutic strategy. The perceived quality of life in adult patients with inherited ichthyosis: a qualitative interview study. CCR8/CCL1 and CXCR3/CXCL10 axis mediated memory T cell activations in recalcitrant drug-induced hypersensitivity patients. Ethical implications of artificial intelligence in skin cancer diagnostics: use-case analyses. A Case of Biologic-Resistant Hand Dermatitis Demonstrates Dual T2/T17 Transcriptomic Abnormalities and Responds to JAK Inhibition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1