Patient education and surgical decision-making in genital gender-affirming surgery.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001202
Rebecca Arteaga, Kim Dryden, Gaines Blasdel
{"title":"Patient education and surgical decision-making in genital gender-affirming surgery.","authors":"Rebecca Arteaga, Kim Dryden, Gaines Blasdel","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>An update on the latest advances in surgical decision-making for genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS), with an emphasis on patient education from three perspectives: surgeon-team perspectives, patient perspectives, and educational resources available to the public on social media.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Transgender, nonbinary, and other culturally specific gender identities (TGNB) patients overwhelmingly desire an active role in the decision-making process. New developments in patient-engagement strategies help mitigate the harm of historical gatekeeping practices by centering the needs and experiences of TGNB patients to create a prioritized research agenda for GGAS effectiveness. Patient educational resources play an integral role in navigating the complexity of GGAS-surgical options, informing patients of the technical and logistical knowledge required for GGAS surgical decision-making. Peer support experiences are a critical facilitator for patient surgical decision-making, both for informed decision-making and for psychosocial support.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Several developments have been made in examining shared-decision making, educational resources from the perspectives of both the surgical team and patients, and the role of social media in GGAS. Surgeons must continue to initiate robust conversations of patient goals, GGAS surgical options, the possible risk and benefit profiles of each option, and aftercare requirements, all while prioritizing patient-engagement strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"308-313"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: An update on the latest advances in surgical decision-making for genital gender-affirming surgery (GGAS), with an emphasis on patient education from three perspectives: surgeon-team perspectives, patient perspectives, and educational resources available to the public on social media.

Recent findings: Transgender, nonbinary, and other culturally specific gender identities (TGNB) patients overwhelmingly desire an active role in the decision-making process. New developments in patient-engagement strategies help mitigate the harm of historical gatekeeping practices by centering the needs and experiences of TGNB patients to create a prioritized research agenda for GGAS effectiveness. Patient educational resources play an integral role in navigating the complexity of GGAS-surgical options, informing patients of the technical and logistical knowledge required for GGAS surgical decision-making. Peer support experiences are a critical facilitator for patient surgical decision-making, both for informed decision-making and for psychosocial support.

Summary: Several developments have been made in examining shared-decision making, educational resources from the perspectives of both the surgical team and patients, and the role of social media in GGAS. Surgeons must continue to initiate robust conversations of patient goals, GGAS surgical options, the possible risk and benefit profiles of each option, and aftercare requirements, all while prioritizing patient-engagement strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生殖器性别确认手术中的患者教育和手术决策。
综述目的:从外科医生团队视角、患者视角以及社交媒体上向公众提供的教育资源三个角度,对生殖器性别确认手术(GGAS)外科决策的最新进展进行更新,重点关注患者教育:最近的研究结果:变性、非二元和其他特定文化性别身份(TGNB)患者绝大多数都希望在决策过程中扮演积极的角色。患者参与策略的新发展有助于减轻历史把关做法的危害,以变性人、非二元人和其他特定文化性别认同(TGNB)患者的需求和经历为中心,为 GGAS 的有效性制定优先研究议程。患者教育资源在了解 GGAS 手术选择的复杂性、告知患者 GGAS 手术决策所需的技术和后勤知识方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。同侪支持经验是患者手术决策的重要促进因素,既可用于知情决策,也可用于社会心理支持。总结:在从手术团队和患者的角度研究共同决策、教育资源以及社交媒体在 GGAS 中的作用方面,已经取得了一些进展。外科医生必须继续就患者的目标、GGAS 手术方案、每种方案可能存在的风险和益处以及术后护理要求展开热烈讨论,同时优先考虑患者参与策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
期刊最新文献
Medical therapy for male infertility. A narrative review on the performance and outcomes of penile and scrotal surgery in the ambulatory setting. The role of MRI in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an update from the last two years. Prostatectomy and other local treatments for oligometastatic prostate cancer: recent and ongoing trials. The changing landscape of nonobstructive azoospermia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1