Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction After the Provision of an Orthopedic Knee Scooter.

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Deutsches Arzteblatt international Pub Date : 2024-08-09 DOI:10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0121
Hannah Clas, Christian Ehrnthaller, Oliver Herrmann, Dirk Theodor Schraeder, Wolfgang Böcker, Kirsi Manz, Peter Thaller
{"title":"Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction After the Provision of an Orthopedic Knee Scooter.","authors":"Hannah Clas, Christian Ehrnthaller, Oliver Herrmann, Dirk Theodor Schraeder, Wolfgang Böcker, Kirsi Manz, Peter Thaller","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Partial or total avoidance of weight-bearing by a lower limb is regularly needed after trauma and surgery. There are approximately 200 such cases per 100 000 persons per year. Forearm crutches have mainly been used in Germany until now to keep these patients mobile. For those who lack the strength or co - ordination needed to use crutches, a wheelchair may become necessary, or they might find themselves forced to continue weightbearing on the affected limb, with possible impending adverse consequences and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The supplementary use of a new type of orthopedic scooter by patients who must avoid weight-bearing by a lower limb, wholly or in part, was studied in a multicenter randomized controlled trial involving 88 subjects. The endpoints were improvement in quality of life (EQ5D, SF36) and improved abilities in everyday life (retrospective registration: DRKS00032980).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who used orthopedic knee scooters (KS) reported a better overall state of health more frequently than those who used forearm crutches (UC) (SF-36 score: 67 [KS group], 95% CI [61; 73]; 59 [UC group], [53; 64]). They also reported less anxiety and depressed mood, greater mobility, and more independence than the patients who used crutches. In addition, they more frequently reported being able to transport themselves 4 x 500 meters in less than 20 minutes (n 30 [KS], 63.8% [48.5; 77.3]; n 6 [UC], 14.6% [5.6, 29.2]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The supplementary use of an orthopedic knee scooter can improve these patients' mobility and independence and prolong the distance over which they can transport themselves. For many patients, this form of treatment may well shorten the time of their total or partial inability to work and thus lower the socioeconomic costs of lower limb injuries and surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"519-526"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11542569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Partial or total avoidance of weight-bearing by a lower limb is regularly needed after trauma and surgery. There are approximately 200 such cases per 100 000 persons per year. Forearm crutches have mainly been used in Germany until now to keep these patients mobile. For those who lack the strength or co - ordination needed to use crutches, a wheelchair may become necessary, or they might find themselves forced to continue weightbearing on the affected limb, with possible impending adverse consequences and complications.

Methods: The supplementary use of a new type of orthopedic scooter by patients who must avoid weight-bearing by a lower limb, wholly or in part, was studied in a multicenter randomized controlled trial involving 88 subjects. The endpoints were improvement in quality of life (EQ5D, SF36) and improved abilities in everyday life (retrospective registration: DRKS00032980).

Results: Patients who used orthopedic knee scooters (KS) reported a better overall state of health more frequently than those who used forearm crutches (UC) (SF-36 score: 67 [KS group], 95% CI [61; 73]; 59 [UC group], [53; 64]). They also reported less anxiety and depressed mood, greater mobility, and more independence than the patients who used crutches. In addition, they more frequently reported being able to transport themselves 4 x 500 meters in less than 20 minutes (n 30 [KS], 63.8% [48.5; 77.3]; n 6 [UC], 14.6% [5.6, 29.2]).

Conclusion: The supplementary use of an orthopedic knee scooter can improve these patients' mobility and independence and prolong the distance over which they can transport themselves. For many patients, this form of treatment may well shorten the time of their total or partial inability to work and thus lower the socioeconomic costs of lower limb injuries and surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提供矫形膝关节代步车后的生活质量和患者满意度--一项多中心随机对照试验。
背景:创伤和手术后经常需要部分或完全避免下肢负重。每年每 10 万人中大约有 200 例这样的病例。迄今为止,德国主要使用腋下拐杖来维持这些患者的行动能力。对于那些缺乏使用拐杖所需的力量或协调能力的患者,可能需要使用轮椅,或者他们可能会发现自己被迫继续用患肢负重,这可能会带来不良后果和并发症:在一项多中心随机对照试验中,研究了必须完全或部分避免下肢负重的患者辅助使用一种新型矫形滑板车的情况,共有 88 名受试者参加。研究终点是生活质量的改善(EQ5D、SF36)和日常生活能力的提高(回顾性登记:DRKS00032980):结果:与使用腋下拐杖(UC)的患者相比,使用矫形膝关节代步车(KS)的患者更常报告总体健康状况较好(SF-36 评分:67 [KS 组],95% CI [61; 73];59 [UC 组],[53; 64])。与使用拐杖的患者相比,他们的焦虑和抑郁情绪更少,活动能力更强,独立性更高。此外,他们更常说自己能在 20 分钟内走完 4 x 500 米(n = 30 [KS组],63.8% [48.5; 77.3];n = 6 [UC组],14.6% [5.6, 29.2]):结论:辅助使用矫形膝关节代步车可以改善这些患者的行动能力和独立性,并延长他们能够自行移动的距离。对许多患者来说,这种治疗方式可以缩短他们完全或部分丧失工作能力的时间,从而降低下肢损伤和手术的社会经济成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
期刊最新文献
Online Radiotherapy: The Paradigm Shift to Real-Time Adaptive Radiotherapy. The Genetics of Intelligence. The Intrauterine Treatment of Open Spinal Dysraphism. Lung Transplantation - Indications, Follow-Up Care and Long-Term Results. The Management of Chronic Kidney Disease not Requiring Renal Replacement Therapy in General Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1