Prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in intestinal failure syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1111/jgh.16668
Ayesha Shah, Thomas Fairlie, Mark Morrison, Neal Martin, Karin Hammer, Johann Hammer, Natasha Koloski, Ali Rezaie, Mark Pimentel, Purna Kashyap, Michael P Jones, Gerald Holtmann
{"title":"Prevalence of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in intestinal failure syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Ayesha Shah, Thomas Fairlie, Mark Morrison, Neal Martin, Karin Hammer, Johann Hammer, Natasha Koloski, Ali Rezaie, Mark Pimentel, Purna Kashyap, Michael P Jones, Gerald Holtmann","doi":"10.1111/jgh.16668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Patients with intestinal failure (IF) have abnormal intestinal anatomy, secretion, and dysmotility, which impairs intestinal homeostatic mechanisms and may lead to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of SIBO in patients with IF and to identify risk factors for SIBO.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2023 for studies that reported the prevalence of SIBO in IF. The prevalence rates, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals of SIBO in IF and the risk factors for SIBO in IF were calculated using random effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Final dataset included nine studies reporting on 407 patients with IF. The prevalence of SIBO in IF was 57.5% (95% CI 44.6-69.4), with substantial heterogeneity in this analysis (I<sup>2</sup> = 80.9, P = 0.0001). SIBO prevalence was sixfold higher in patients with IF who received parenteral nutrition (PN) compared with IF patients not on PN (OR = 6.0, 95% CI 3.0-11.9, P = 0.0001). Overall, the prevalence of SIBO in patients with IF using PPI/acid-suppressing agents (72.0%, 95% CI 57.5-83.8) was numerically higher compared with IF patients not using these agents (47.6%, 95% CI 25.7-70.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that there is an increased risk of SIBO in patients with IF and that PN, and potentially, the use of PPI/acid-suppressing agents is risk factors for SIBO development in patients with IF. However, the quality of evidence is low and can be attributed to lack of case-control studies and clinical heterogeneity seen in the studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15877,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16668","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Patients with intestinal failure (IF) have abnormal intestinal anatomy, secretion, and dysmotility, which impairs intestinal homeostatic mechanisms and may lead to small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of SIBO in patients with IF and to identify risk factors for SIBO.

Methods: MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2023 for studies that reported the prevalence of SIBO in IF. The prevalence rates, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals of SIBO in IF and the risk factors for SIBO in IF were calculated using random effects model.

Results: Final dataset included nine studies reporting on 407 patients with IF. The prevalence of SIBO in IF was 57.5% (95% CI 44.6-69.4), with substantial heterogeneity in this analysis (I2 = 80.9, P = 0.0001). SIBO prevalence was sixfold higher in patients with IF who received parenteral nutrition (PN) compared with IF patients not on PN (OR = 6.0, 95% CI 3.0-11.9, P = 0.0001). Overall, the prevalence of SIBO in patients with IF using PPI/acid-suppressing agents (72.0%, 95% CI 57.5-83.8) was numerically higher compared with IF patients not using these agents (47.6%, 95% CI 25.7-70.2).

Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that there is an increased risk of SIBO in patients with IF and that PN, and potentially, the use of PPI/acid-suppressing agents is risk factors for SIBO development in patients with IF. However, the quality of evidence is low and can be attributed to lack of case-control studies and clinical heterogeneity seen in the studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肠衰竭综合征中小肠细菌过度生长的患病率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:肠功能衰竭(IF)患者的肠道解剖、分泌和蠕动异常,损害了肠道平衡机制,可能导致小肠细菌过度生长(SIBO)。我们进行了一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析,以确定 IF 患者中 SIBO 的患病率,并确定 SIBO 的风险因素:方法:检索了MEDLINE(PubMed)和Embase电子数据库中从开始到2023年12月报告IF患者SIBO患病率的研究。采用随机效应模型计算了中频SIBO的患病率、几率比(OR)和95%置信区间,以及中频SIBO的风险因素:最终数据集包括9项研究,报告了407名IF患者。SIBO在IF中的流行率为57.5%(95% CI 44.6-69.4),该分析具有很大的异质性(I2 = 80.9,P = 0.0001)。与未接受肠外营养(PN)的 IF 患者相比,接受肠外营养(PN)的 IF 患者 SIBO 患病率高出六倍(OR = 6.0,95% CI 3.0-11.9,P = 0.0001)。总体而言,与未使用 PPI/抑酸剂的 IF 患者(47.6%,95% CI 25.7-70.2)相比,使用 PPI/抑酸剂的 IF 患者的 SIBO 患病率(72.0%,95% CI 57.5-83.8)在数字上更高:本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,IF 患者发生 SIBO 的风险增加,PN 以及 PPI/抑酸剂的使用可能是 IF 患者发生 SIBO 的风险因素。然而,由于缺乏病例对照研究和研究中出现的临床异质性,该研究的证据质量较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.40%
发文量
326
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology is produced 12 times per year and publishes peer-reviewed original papers, reviews and editorials concerned with clinical practice and research in the fields of hepatology, gastroenterology and endoscopy. Papers cover the medical, radiological, pathological, biochemical, physiological and historical aspects of the subject areas. All submitted papers are reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating vonoprazan bismuth‐containing triple therapy versus quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori Endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine needle biopsy using macroscopic on‐site evaluation technique reduces the number passes yet maintains a high diagnostic accuracy: A randomized study Bioinformatics and experimental validation were combined to explore lactylation‐related biomarkers in HBV‐associated acute liver failure Selenium alleviates dextran sulfate sodium‐induced colitis and inhibits ferroptosis of intestinal epithelial cells via upregulating glutathione peroxidase 4 Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors: Unique features and low lethality compared with small bowel adenocarcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1