The effect of the number of strands and knot throws of core suture techniques on the mechanical properties of the repaired flexor tendon

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1002/jor.25916
Liliann R. Linden, Ramona Reisdorf, Omar Selim, Lawrence Berglund, Chunfeng Zhao
{"title":"The effect of the number of strands and knot throws of core suture techniques on the mechanical properties of the repaired flexor tendon","authors":"Liliann R. Linden,&nbsp;Ramona Reisdorf,&nbsp;Omar Selim,&nbsp;Lawrence Berglund,&nbsp;Chunfeng Zhao","doi":"10.1002/jor.25916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Flexor tendon injury is a common hand trauma that requires surgical repair. The objective was to compare the repaired strength and gliding resistance with a varied number of repair strands and of square knots using a two-strand-overhand locking (TSOL) knot. First, isolated suture loops with different number of suture strands and number of closing knots were compared in mechanical strength and failure mode. Then, 90 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons from turkey digits were used for the tendon repair experiment. Both phases followed a similar 3 × 3 matrix comparing the knot type including TSOL+1SK (square knot), TSOL+2SK, and TSOL+3 SK and repair techniques including two-, four-, and six-strand repairs techniques respectively. The repaired tendons were tested for tendon resistance against pulley (friction), maximum force, force at 2 mm displacement, stiffness, and failure mode. Increasing the number of strands and closing square knots increases the tensile strength and stiffness of flexor tendon repairs and isolated suture loops without a significant effect on tendon friction. An increase in the number of square knots have shown increased strength only in Pennington repair, which correlated with the increased number of knot unraveling, a weak knot failure model. Our data demonstrated that increasing the number of strands is effective for improving the overall strength of tendon repair. When a two-strand repair is chosen, increasing knot number can improve repair strength. However, the number of knots appears not affecting repair strength in six-strand repair technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jor.25916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Flexor tendon injury is a common hand trauma that requires surgical repair. The objective was to compare the repaired strength and gliding resistance with a varied number of repair strands and of square knots using a two-strand-overhand locking (TSOL) knot. First, isolated suture loops with different number of suture strands and number of closing knots were compared in mechanical strength and failure mode. Then, 90 flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendons from turkey digits were used for the tendon repair experiment. Both phases followed a similar 3 × 3 matrix comparing the knot type including TSOL+1SK (square knot), TSOL+2SK, and TSOL+3 SK and repair techniques including two-, four-, and six-strand repairs techniques respectively. The repaired tendons were tested for tendon resistance against pulley (friction), maximum force, force at 2 mm displacement, stiffness, and failure mode. Increasing the number of strands and closing square knots increases the tensile strength and stiffness of flexor tendon repairs and isolated suture loops without a significant effect on tendon friction. An increase in the number of square knots have shown increased strength only in Pennington repair, which correlated with the increased number of knot unraveling, a weak knot failure model. Our data demonstrated that increasing the number of strands is effective for improving the overall strength of tendon repair. When a two-strand repair is chosen, increasing knot number can improve repair strength. However, the number of knots appears not affecting repair strength in six-strand repair technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
核心缝合技术的股数和打结方式对修复后屈肌腱机械性能的影响。
屈肌腱损伤是一种需要手术修复的常见手部创伤。研究的目的是比较不同修复股数和使用双股徒手锁定(TSOL)结的方形结的修复强度和滑动阻力。首先,比较了不同缝合股数和闭合结数的孤立缝合环的机械强度和失效模式。然后,使用 90 根来自火鸡手指的屈指肌腱(FDP)进行肌腱修复实验。两个阶段都采用了类似的 3 × 3 矩阵,分别比较了包括 TSOL+1SK (方形结)、TSOL+2SK 和 TSOL+3 SK 在内的结类型以及包括双股、四股和六股修复技术在内的修复技术。对修复后的肌腱进行了滑轮阻力(摩擦力)、最大力、2 毫米位移时的力、刚度和破坏模式测试。增加股数和闭合方结可提高屈肌腱修复和孤立缝合环的抗拉强度和刚度,但对肌腱摩擦力无明显影响。方形结数量的增加仅在彭宁顿修复中显示出强度的增加,这与结解开数量的增加(一种弱结破坏模式)有关。我们的数据表明,增加股数能有效提高肌腱修复的整体强度。当选择双股修复时,增加绳结数量可提高修复强度。然而,在六股修复技术中,绳结数量似乎不会影响修复强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - Cover Issue Information - Editorial Board and TOC Osteoarthritis early-, mid- and late-stage progression in the rat medial meniscus transection model. Defining the segmental tension generated in a vertebral body tethering system for scoliosis. Gait stability improves following unilateral total ankle arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1