Elite class self-interest, socioeconomic inequality and U.S. population health.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Sociology of health & illness Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1111/1467-9566.13813
Gabe Ignatow, Iliya Gutin
{"title":"Elite class self-interest, socioeconomic inequality and U.S. population health.","authors":"Gabe Ignatow, Iliya Gutin","doi":"10.1111/1467-9566.13813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Class-based perspectives on the persistent social gradients in health within modern welfare states largely focus on the adverse consequences of unfettered neoliberalism and entrenched meritocratic socioeconomic selection. Namely, neoliberal-driven economic inequality has fuelled resentment and stress among lower-status groups, while these groups have become more homogeneous with regard to health behaviours and outcomes. We synthesise several sociological and historical literatures to argue that, in addition to these class-based explanations, socioeconomic inequality may contribute to persistent social gradients in health due to elite class self-interest-in particular elites' preferences for overdiagnosis, overprescription and costly high-technology medical treatments over disease prevention, and for increased tolerance for regulatory capture. We demonstrate that this self-interest provides parsimonious explanations for several contemporary trends in U.S. health inequality including (A) supply-side factors in drug-related deaths, (B) longitudinal trends in the social gradients of obesity and chronic disease mortality and (C) the immigrant health advantage. We conclude that sociological theories of elite class self-interest usefully complement theories of the psychosocial effects of neoliberalism and of meritocratic social selection while answering recent calls for research on the role advantaged groups play in generating inequalities in health, and for research that moves beyond technological determinism in health sociology.</p>","PeriodicalId":21685,"journal":{"name":"Sociology of health & illness","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology of health & illness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13813","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Class-based perspectives on the persistent social gradients in health within modern welfare states largely focus on the adverse consequences of unfettered neoliberalism and entrenched meritocratic socioeconomic selection. Namely, neoliberal-driven economic inequality has fuelled resentment and stress among lower-status groups, while these groups have become more homogeneous with regard to health behaviours and outcomes. We synthesise several sociological and historical literatures to argue that, in addition to these class-based explanations, socioeconomic inequality may contribute to persistent social gradients in health due to elite class self-interest-in particular elites' preferences for overdiagnosis, overprescription and costly high-technology medical treatments over disease prevention, and for increased tolerance for regulatory capture. We demonstrate that this self-interest provides parsimonious explanations for several contemporary trends in U.S. health inequality including (A) supply-side factors in drug-related deaths, (B) longitudinal trends in the social gradients of obesity and chronic disease mortality and (C) the immigrant health advantage. We conclude that sociological theories of elite class self-interest usefully complement theories of the psychosocial effects of neoliberalism and of meritocratic social selection while answering recent calls for research on the role advantaged groups play in generating inequalities in health, and for research that moves beyond technological determinism in health sociology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
精英阶层的自我利益、社会经济不平等与美国人口健康。
关于现代福利国家中持续存在的社会健康梯度问题,基于阶级的观点主要集中在不受约束的新自由主义和根深蒂固的任人唯贤的社会经济选择所造成的不良后果上。也就是说,新自由主义驱动的经济不平等加剧了地位较低群体的不满和压力,而这些群体的健康行为和结果却变得更加单一。我们综合了多篇社会学和历史文献,认为除了这些基于阶级的解释之外,社会经济不平等还可能由于精英阶级的自身利益--特别是精英们偏好过度诊断、过度处方和昂贵的高科技医疗而非疾病预防,以及对监管俘获的更大容忍度--而导致健康方面持续存在社会梯度。我们证明,这种自身利益为当代美国健康不平等的几种趋势提供了合理解释,包括(A)与药物相关死亡的供应方因素,(B)肥胖和慢性病死亡率社会梯度的纵向趋势,以及(C)移民的健康优势。我们的结论是,精英阶级自我利益的社会学理论是对新自由主义和精英社会选择的社会心理效应理论的有益补充,同时也回应了最近关于研究优势群体在产生健康不平等中的作用以及在健康社会学中超越技术决定论的研究的呼吁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.90%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Sociology of Health & Illness is an international journal which publishes sociological articles on all aspects of health, illness, medicine and health care. We welcome empirical and theoretical contributions in this field.
期刊最新文献
Health inequalities and contemporary youth: Young people's accounts of the social determinants of health in an 'austere meritocracy'. Engaging with discursive complexities in mental health accessibility: Implications for acquired brain injury. Genetics, emotion and care: Navigating future reproductive decisions in families of children with rare genetic conditions. Positioning comfort measures in antenatal counselling for periviable infants. Family planning policy and gender in Nigeria: A thematic analysis of the government's health policy perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1