Shedding light on the non-operative treatment of the forgotten side of the knee: rehabilitation of medial collateral ligament injuries-a systematic review.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001750
Jasmine Svantesson, Ramana Piussi, Elin Weissglas, Eleonor Svantesson, Alexandra Horvath, Erik Börjesson, Andy Williams, Robert Prill, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski
{"title":"Shedding light on the non-operative treatment of the forgotten side of the knee: rehabilitation of medial collateral ligament injuries-a systematic review.","authors":"Jasmine Svantesson, Ramana Piussi, Elin Weissglas, Eleonor Svantesson, Alexandra Horvath, Erik Börjesson, Andy Williams, Robert Prill, Kristian Samuelsson, Eric Hamrin Senorski","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to review the current literature regarding the non-operative treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review, registered in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E9CP4).</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The Embase, MEDLINE and PEDro databases were searched; last search was performed on December 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Peer-reviewed original reports from studies that included information about individuals who sustained an isolated MCL injury with non-surgical treatment as an intervention, or reports comparing surgical with non-surgical treatment were eligible for inclusion. Included reports were synthesised qualitatively. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 26 reports (1912 patients) were included, of which 18 were published before the year 2000 and 8 after. No differences in non-operative treatment were reported between grade I and II injuries, where immediate weight bearing and ambulation were tolerated, and rehabilitation comprised different types of strengthening exercises with poorly reported details. Some reports used immobilisation with a brace as a treatment method, while others did not use any equipment. The use of a brace and duration of use was inconsistently reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is substantial heterogeneity and lack of detail regarding the non-operative treatment of isolated MCL injuries. This should prompt researchers and clinicians to produce high-quality evidence studies on the promising non-operative treatment of isolated MCL injuries to aid in decision-making and guide rehabilitation after MCL injury.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level I, systematic review.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"10 2","pages":"e001750"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11202733/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to review the current literature regarding the non-operative treatment of isolated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries.

Design: Systematic review, registered in the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/E9CP4).

Data sources: The Embase, MEDLINE and PEDro databases were searched; last search was performed on December 2023.

Eligibility criteria: Peer-reviewed original reports from studies that included information about individuals who sustained an isolated MCL injury with non-surgical treatment as an intervention, or reports comparing surgical with non-surgical treatment were eligible for inclusion. Included reports were synthesised qualitatively. Risk of bias was assessed with the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies. Certainty of evidence was determined using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation.

Results: A total of 26 reports (1912 patients) were included, of which 18 were published before the year 2000 and 8 after. No differences in non-operative treatment were reported between grade I and II injuries, where immediate weight bearing and ambulation were tolerated, and rehabilitation comprised different types of strengthening exercises with poorly reported details. Some reports used immobilisation with a brace as a treatment method, while others did not use any equipment. The use of a brace and duration of use was inconsistently reported.

Conclusion: There is substantial heterogeneity and lack of detail regarding the non-operative treatment of isolated MCL injuries. This should prompt researchers and clinicians to produce high-quality evidence studies on the promising non-operative treatment of isolated MCL injuries to aid in decision-making and guide rehabilitation after MCL injury.

Level of evidence: Level I, systematic review.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示膝关节被遗忘一侧的非手术治疗:内侧副韧带损伤的康复--系统综述。
研究目的本研究旨在回顾有关孤立性内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤非手术治疗的现有文献:数据来源:Embase、MEDLINE 和 PEDro:检索了 Embase、MEDLINE 和 PEDro 数据库;最后一次检索于 2023 年 12 月进行:经同行评议的原始研究报告符合纳入条件,这些报告包括以非手术治疗为干预措施的孤立性 MCL 损伤患者的相关信息,或比较手术与非手术治疗的报告。对纳入的报告进行定性综合。采用非随机研究偏倚风险评估工具对偏倚风险进行评估。证据的确定性采用建议分级评估发展和评价法来确定:共纳入 26 篇报告(1912 名患者),其中 18 篇发表于 2000 年之前,8 篇发表于 2000 年之后。I级和II级损伤的非手术治疗方法没有差异,均可立即负重和下地行走,康复治疗包括不同类型的强化训练,但详细报道较少。一些报告使用支架固定作为治疗方法,而另一些报告则不使用任何设备。关于支具的使用和持续时间的报道也不一致:结论:关于孤立性 MCL 损伤的非手术治疗存在很大的异质性,且缺乏细节。这应促使研究人员和临床医生就有希望的孤立性 MCL 损伤非手术治疗方法进行高质量的证据研究,以帮助决策并指导 MCL 损伤后的康复:证据级别:I级,系统综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Improving functional capacity in haemophilia through adapted physical activity: a pilot study protocol. Grip strength, muscle soreness and pain threshold perception evolution in baseball pitchers in a simulated 75-pitch game: a repeated measures study. Higher level of communication between the medical staff and the performance staff is associated with a lower hamstring injury burden: a substudy on 14 teams from the UEFA Elite Club Injury Study. Descriptive study on injuries and illness in Dutch female adolescent and young adult handball players. To compare the effect and durability of the effect of corrective exercise and manual therapy focused on the back versus hip on disability, function, pressure pain, pain map, health and psychological status of the elderly with chronic back and hip pain: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1