Similarity or stereotypes? An investigation of how exemplar gender guides children's math learning.

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Developmental Science Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1111/desc.13542
Anne E Riggs, Antonya Marie Gonzalez
{"title":"Similarity or stereotypes? An investigation of how exemplar gender guides children's math learning.","authors":"Anne E Riggs, Antonya Marie Gonzalez","doi":"10.1111/desc.13542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How does the representation of boy and girl exemplars in curricular materials affect students' learning? We tested two competing hypotheses about the impact of gender exemplar on learning: First, in line with Social Learning Theory, children might exhibit a same-gender bias such that they prefer to learn from exemplars that match their gender (H1). Second, consistent with research on children's stereotypes about gender and math (e.g., associating boys with math competence), children might prefer to learn from exemplars who match their stereotypes about who is good at math (H2). We tested these hypotheses with children in middle school (N = 166), a time of development in which stereotypes are well-engrained, but before gender differences in math achievement appear. Children viewed two distinct math strategies, each presented by a boy or girl exemplar. We then examined which strategy children employed on a subsequent math test as well as their perceived similarity to the exemplars and their awareness or endorsement of gender-math stereotypes. Children did not preferentially learn from same-gender exemplars. However, children with stereotypes associating boys with math were more likely to learn the more difficult strategy when it was presented by a boy exemplar than children who did not associate boys with math. The results of this study provide valuable insight into how children's stereotypes impact their real-world learning. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: How does the representation of boy and girl exemplars in children's curricular materials affect their learning? Past research demonstrates that children prefer to learn from same-gender exemplars, but also hold a stereotype that boys are better at math. In the current study, we test whether children preferentially adopt a math strategy presented by a boy or girl exemplar. Children who held the belief that boys are better at math were more likely to learn a difficult strategy from boy exemplars than children who did not endorse this stereotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13542","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How does the representation of boy and girl exemplars in curricular materials affect students' learning? We tested two competing hypotheses about the impact of gender exemplar on learning: First, in line with Social Learning Theory, children might exhibit a same-gender bias such that they prefer to learn from exemplars that match their gender (H1). Second, consistent with research on children's stereotypes about gender and math (e.g., associating boys with math competence), children might prefer to learn from exemplars who match their stereotypes about who is good at math (H2). We tested these hypotheses with children in middle school (N = 166), a time of development in which stereotypes are well-engrained, but before gender differences in math achievement appear. Children viewed two distinct math strategies, each presented by a boy or girl exemplar. We then examined which strategy children employed on a subsequent math test as well as their perceived similarity to the exemplars and their awareness or endorsement of gender-math stereotypes. Children did not preferentially learn from same-gender exemplars. However, children with stereotypes associating boys with math were more likely to learn the more difficult strategy when it was presented by a boy exemplar than children who did not associate boys with math. The results of this study provide valuable insight into how children's stereotypes impact their real-world learning. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: How does the representation of boy and girl exemplars in children's curricular materials affect their learning? Past research demonstrates that children prefer to learn from same-gender exemplars, but also hold a stereotype that boys are better at math. In the current study, we test whether children preferentially adopt a math strategy presented by a boy or girl exemplar. Children who held the belief that boys are better at math were more likely to learn a difficult strategy from boy exemplars than children who did not endorse this stereotype.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相似性还是刻板印象?关于榜样的性别如何引导儿童学习数学的调查。
课程教材中的男女生范例如何影响学生的学习?关于性别范例对学习的影响,我们测试了两个相互竞争的假设:首先,根据社会学习理论,儿童可能会表现出一种同性别偏见,即他们更喜欢从与其性别相符的范例中学习(H1)。其次,与有关儿童对性别和数学的刻板印象(如将男孩与数学能力联系起来)的研究相一致,儿童可能更喜欢从符合他们对谁擅长数学的刻板印象的范例中学习(H2)。我们以初中儿童(N = 166)为研究对象对上述假设进行了测试,在这一发展阶段,定型观念根深蒂固,但在数学成绩出现性别差异之前。孩子们观看了两种不同的数学策略,每种策略都由一个男孩或女孩范例呈现。然后,我们考察了儿童在随后的数学测试中采用哪种策略,以及他们与榜样的相似度和他们对数学性别刻板印象的认识或认可程度。结果表明,儿童并不偏向于从同性别的范例中学习。然而,与那些不把男孩与数学联系在一起的儿童相比,有把男孩与数学联系在一起的刻板印象的儿童更有可能从男孩范例中学习到更难的策略。这项研究的结果为了解儿童的刻板印象如何影响他们在现实世界中的学习提供了宝贵的见解。研究亮点:在儿童的课程材料中出现男孩和女孩的范例对他们的学习有什么影响?过去的研究表明,儿童更喜欢从同性别的范例中学习,但同时也持有男孩更擅长数学的刻板印象。在本研究中,我们测试了儿童是否更倾向于采用由男孩或女孩范例提供的数学策略。与没有这种刻板印象的儿童相比,持有 "男孩更擅长数学 "这一信念的儿童更有可能从男孩的范例中学习一种困难的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
期刊最新文献
Early Caregiver Predictability Shapes Neural Indices of Statistical Learning Later in Infancy. Prospective Interrelation Between Sensory Sensitivity and Fine Motor Skills During the First 18 Months Predicts Later Autistic Features. Functional Brain Adaptations During Speech Processing in 4-Month-Old Bilingual Infants. Seeing Gray in a World of Black and White: Children Appreciate Reasoners Who Approach Moral Dilemmas With Humility. 'Fix' the Child or Change the Learning Environment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1