The mediating effect of job embeddedness on the nursing work environment and transition shock among new nurses: A cross-sectional study

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104034
Siqi Zhou , Jun Ma , Sisi Fan , Honghong Wang , Wenhong An , Lu Li , Tao Xiao
{"title":"The mediating effect of job embeddedness on the nursing work environment and transition shock among new nurses: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Siqi Zhou ,&nbsp;Jun Ma ,&nbsp;Sisi Fan ,&nbsp;Honghong Wang ,&nbsp;Wenhong An ,&nbsp;Lu Li ,&nbsp;Tao Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aims to investigate the status of transition shock and test the mediating effect of job embeddedness on the nursing work environment and transition shock among new nurses.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Transition shock, primarily experienced during the first two years of employment, manifests itself as an unsettling or discordant experience among new nurses, which is caused by the gap between theoretical learning and clinical practice.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This is a cross-sectional survey study, following the STROBE guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 435 new nurses from November to December 2022 in Hunan Province, China. The participants were recruited to complete a sociodemographic information questionnaire and rank 3 standardized scales of transition shock (Cronbach's alpha = 0.918), job embeddedness (Cronbach's alpha = 0.890) and nursing work environment (Cronbach's alpha = 0.946). Then, the data were analysed by SPSS 26.0 and mediation testing was performed using Hayes’ PROCESS macro (Model 4). A <em>p</em> value of &lt; 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean score with standard deviation of the transition shock scale in new nurses was 88.86 (22.50). The place of origin, working months and weekly working hours were the significant sociodemographic factors that affected the transition shock score in new nurses. Transition shock was found to be negatively related to both job embeddedness (<em>r</em> = −0.468, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and nursing work environment (<em>r</em> = −0.416, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), while job embeddedness mediated the relationship between transition shock and nursing work environment (<em>R</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 0.262, <em>F</em> = 30.455, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>New nurses from rural areas and with longer weekly working hours are more prone to transition shock. Those with 6–12 months of employment experience more pronounced transition shock than those with less than 6 months. In addition, the nursing work environment can not only directly influence transition shock for new nurses but also indirectly influence it through job embeddedness. These findings provide a basis for hospitals to develop strategies to effectively address transition shock in new nurses and ultimately solve the nursing shortage issue.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147159532400163X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

This study aims to investigate the status of transition shock and test the mediating effect of job embeddedness on the nursing work environment and transition shock among new nurses.

Background

Transition shock, primarily experienced during the first two years of employment, manifests itself as an unsettling or discordant experience among new nurses, which is caused by the gap between theoretical learning and clinical practice.

Design

This is a cross-sectional survey study, following the STROBE guidelines.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 435 new nurses from November to December 2022 in Hunan Province, China. The participants were recruited to complete a sociodemographic information questionnaire and rank 3 standardized scales of transition shock (Cronbach's alpha = 0.918), job embeddedness (Cronbach's alpha = 0.890) and nursing work environment (Cronbach's alpha = 0.946). Then, the data were analysed by SPSS 26.0 and mediation testing was performed using Hayes’ PROCESS macro (Model 4). A p value of < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results

The mean score with standard deviation of the transition shock scale in new nurses was 88.86 (22.50). The place of origin, working months and weekly working hours were the significant sociodemographic factors that affected the transition shock score in new nurses. Transition shock was found to be negatively related to both job embeddedness (r = −0.468, p < 0.001) and nursing work environment (r = −0.416, p < 0.001), while job embeddedness mediated the relationship between transition shock and nursing work environment (R2 = 0.262, F = 30.455, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

New nurses from rural areas and with longer weekly working hours are more prone to transition shock. Those with 6–12 months of employment experience more pronounced transition shock than those with less than 6 months. In addition, the nursing work environment can not only directly influence transition shock for new nurses but also indirectly influence it through job embeddedness. These findings provide a basis for hospitals to develop strategies to effectively address transition shock in new nurses and ultimately solve the nursing shortage issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工作嵌入性对护理工作环境和新护士转型冲击的中介效应:一项横断面研究。
目的:本研究旨在调查新入职护士过渡震荡的状况,并检验工作嵌入性对护理工作环境和过渡震荡的中介效应:背景:转型冲击主要发生在入职头两年,表现为新护士因理论学习与临床实践脱节而产生的不安或不和谐体验:这是一项横断面调查研究,遵循 STROBE 指南:方法:2022 年 11 月至 12 月在湖南省对 435 名新入职护士进行了横断面研究。被试填写了一份社会人口学信息问卷,并对过渡冲击(Cronbach's alpha = 0.918)、工作嵌入感(Cronbach's alpha = 0.890)和护理工作环境(Cronbach's alpha = 0.946)3个标准化量表进行了排序。然后,使用 SPSS 26.0 对数据进行分析,并使用 Hayes 的 PROCESS 宏(模型 4)进行中介检验。P 值小于 0.05 即为具有统计学意义:新护士过渡期冲击量表的平均分和标准差为 88.86(22.50)分。原籍地、工作月份和每周工作时间是影响新护士过渡震荡得分的重要社会人口因素。研究发现,转型冲击与工作嵌入度(r = -0.468,p < 0.001)和护理工作环境(r = -0.416,p < 0.001)均呈负相关,而工作嵌入度在转型冲击与护理工作环境之间起中介作用(R2 = 0.262,F = 30.455,p < 0.001):结论:来自农村地区、每周工作时间较长的新护士更容易受到转型冲击。工作 6-12 个月的新护士比工作少于 6 个月的新护士更容易受到转型冲击。此外,护理工作环境不仅会直接影响新护士的转型冲击,还会通过工作嵌入性间接影响新护士的转型冲击。这些研究结果为医院制定有效解决新护士转型冲击的策略,最终解决护士短缺问题提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
“Removing the home court advantage”: A qualitative evaluation of LEGO® as an interprofessional simulation icebreaker for midwifery and medical students Does being involved in a research project enhance the postgraduate taught student experience: A qualitative research case study Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Simulation as a method in a supervision course, experiences of midwives and specialist nurses: A qualitative study Characteristics of nursing educators' professional competency standards: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1