Pharmacogenomic studies of fertility outcomes in pediatric cancer survivors – A systematic review

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cts-Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1111/cts.13827
Tayla Stenta, Michael Assis, Katie Ayers, Elena J. Tucker, Andreas Halman, Debra Gook, Andrew H. Sinclair, David A. Elliott, Yasmin Jayasinghe, Rachel Conyers
{"title":"Pharmacogenomic studies of fertility outcomes in pediatric cancer survivors – A systematic review","authors":"Tayla Stenta,&nbsp;Michael Assis,&nbsp;Katie Ayers,&nbsp;Elena J. Tucker,&nbsp;Andreas Halman,&nbsp;Debra Gook,&nbsp;Andrew H. Sinclair,&nbsp;David A. Elliott,&nbsp;Yasmin Jayasinghe,&nbsp;Rachel Conyers","doi":"10.1111/cts.13827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For the same age, sex, and dosage, there can be significant variation in fertility outcomes in childhood cancer survivors. Genetics may explain this variation. This study aims to: (i) review the genetic contributions to infertility, (ii) search for pharmacogenomic studies looking at interactions of cancer treatment, genetic predisposition and fertility-related outcomes. Systematic searches in MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Classic+Embase, and PubMed were conducted using the following selection criteria: (i) pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors, below 25 years old at the time of diagnosis, (ii) fertility outcome measures after cancer therapy, (iii) genetic considerations. Studies were excluded if they were (i) conducted in animal models, (ii) were not published in English, (iii) editorial letters, (iv) theses. Articles were screened in Covidence by at least two independent reviewers, followed by data extraction and a risk of bias assessment using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Eight articles were reviewed with a total of 29 genes. Outcome measures included sperm concentration, azoospermia, AMH levels, assessment of premature menopause, ever being pregnant or siring a pregnancy. Three studies included replication cohorts, which attempted replication of SNP findings for NPY2R, BRSK1, FANCI, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP2B6. Six studies were rated with a high risk of bias. Differing methods may explain a lack of replication, and small cohorts may have contributed to few significant findings. Larger, prospective longitudinal studies with an unbiased genome-wide focus will be important to replicate significant results, which can be applied clinically.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199333/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.13827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For the same age, sex, and dosage, there can be significant variation in fertility outcomes in childhood cancer survivors. Genetics may explain this variation. This study aims to: (i) review the genetic contributions to infertility, (ii) search for pharmacogenomic studies looking at interactions of cancer treatment, genetic predisposition and fertility-related outcomes. Systematic searches in MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Classic+Embase, and PubMed were conducted using the following selection criteria: (i) pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors, below 25 years old at the time of diagnosis, (ii) fertility outcome measures after cancer therapy, (iii) genetic considerations. Studies were excluded if they were (i) conducted in animal models, (ii) were not published in English, (iii) editorial letters, (iv) theses. Articles were screened in Covidence by at least two independent reviewers, followed by data extraction and a risk of bias assessment using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool. Eight articles were reviewed with a total of 29 genes. Outcome measures included sperm concentration, azoospermia, AMH levels, assessment of premature menopause, ever being pregnant or siring a pregnancy. Three studies included replication cohorts, which attempted replication of SNP findings for NPY2R, BRSK1, FANCI, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, and CYP2B6. Six studies were rated with a high risk of bias. Differing methods may explain a lack of replication, and small cohorts may have contributed to few significant findings. Larger, prospective longitudinal studies with an unbiased genome-wide focus will be important to replicate significant results, which can be applied clinically.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科癌症幸存者生育结果的药物基因组学研究--系统综述。
在相同的年龄、性别和剂量下,儿童癌症幸存者的生育结果可能会有很大差异。遗传学可以解释这种差异。本研究旨在:(i) 回顾不孕症的遗传因素,(ii) 寻找药物基因组学研究,研究癌症治疗、遗传易感性和生育相关结果之间的相互作用。采用以下选择标准在 MEDLINE Ovid、Embase Classic+Embase 和 PubMed 中进行了系统检索:(i) 诊断时年龄在 25 岁以下的儿童、青少年和年轻成人癌症幸存者,(ii) 癌症治疗后的生育结果测量,(iii) 遗传因素。如果研究(i)是在动物模型中进行的,(ii)不是以英文发表的,(iii)是社论信件,(iv)是论文,则排除在外。文章由至少两名独立审稿人在 Covidence 中进行筛选,然后进行数据提取,并使用预后研究质量工具进行偏倚风险评估。共审查了 8 篇文章,涉及 29 个基因。结果测量指标包括精子浓度、无精子症、AMH水平、过早绝经评估、曾经怀孕或妊娠。三项研究包括复制队列,试图复制 NPY2R、BRSK1、FANCI、CYP2C19、CYP3A4 和 CYP2B6 的 SNP 发现。六项研究被评为偏倚风险较高。不同的研究方法可能是缺乏重复性的原因,而小规模的队列可能是导致重大发现较少的原因。以无偏见的全基因组为重点进行更大规模的前瞻性纵向研究,对于复制可应用于临床的重要结果非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
期刊最新文献
Pharmacokinetic comparison of subcutaneously administered CT-P13 (biosimilar of infliximab) via autoinjector and pre-filled syringe in healthy participants. Pharmacokinetic model-guided enoxaparin dosing in the Neonatal ICU: Retrospective cohort study to plan for prospective feasibility trial. Association between statin use and dry eye disease in patients with hyperlipidemia: A population-based retrospective cohort study. Is there a possibility that P-glycoprotein reduces reproductive toxicity in males but breast cancer resistance protein does not? Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ART-648, a PDE4 inhibitor in healthy subjects: A randomized, placebo-controlled phase I study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1