Evaluating Dental Monitoring effectiveness compared with conventional monitoring of clear aligner therapy using the Peer Assessment Rating index

IF 2.7 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.014

{"title":"Evaluating Dental Monitoring effectiveness compared with conventional monitoring of clear aligner therapy using the Peer Assessment Rating index","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Dental Monitoring (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France) compared with conventional monitoring (CM) during active orthodontic treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to evaluate the pretreatment and posttreatment records of 51 patients, with 26 in the CM group and 25 in the DM group. The change in weighted PAR was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The chi-square test revealed that the CM group had a higher percentage of patients in the great improvement category compared with the DM group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (<em>P</em> = 0.192). A repeated measures general linear model demonstrated significant improvement over time (<em>P</em> <0.001), with no statistically significant group differences noted between CM and DM (<em>P</em> = 0.181) and no statistically significant time-by-group interaction (<em>P</em> = 0.299).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Both CM and DM showed significant improvements in weighted PAR scores, but no statistically significant difference is present between the 2 groups.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624002221","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Dental Monitoring (DM) (Dental Monitoring SAS, Paris, France) compared with conventional monitoring (CM) during active orthodontic treatment.

Methods

The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to evaluate the pretreatment and posttreatment records of 51 patients, with 26 in the CM group and 25 in the DM group. The change in weighted PAR was analyzed to assess the effectiveness of treatment.

Results

The chi-square test revealed that the CM group had a higher percentage of patients in the great improvement category compared with the DM group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.192). A repeated measures general linear model demonstrated significant improvement over time (P <0.001), with no statistically significant group differences noted between CM and DM (P = 0.181) and no statistically significant time-by-group interaction (P = 0.299).

Conclusions

Both CM and DM showed significant improvements in weighted PAR scores, but no statistically significant difference is present between the 2 groups.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

利用同行评估评级指数，评估牙科监测与传统的透明矫治器治疗监测相比的效果。

简介：本研究旨在评估在积极的正畸治疗过程中，牙科监测（DM）（法国巴黎牙科监测公司）与传统监测（CM）的有效性：本研究旨在评估在积极正畸治疗期间牙科监测（DM）（法国巴黎牙科监测公司）与传统监测（CM）相比的有效性：方法：使用同行评估等级（PAR）指数评估 51 名患者的治疗前和治疗后记录，其中 CM 组 26 人，DM 组 25 人。分析加权 PAR 的变化以评估治疗效果：卡方检验显示，与 DM 组相比，CM 组有更高比例的患者病情大有好转。然而，这一差异并无统计学意义（P = 0.192）。重复测量一般线性模型显示，随着时间的推移，CM 组和 DM 组患者的病情均有显著改善（P=0.192）：CM组和DM组的加权PAR评分均有明显改善，但两组之间的差异无统计学意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

13.30%

发文量

432

审稿时长

66 days

期刊介绍： Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.