Effects of discounting fruits, vegetables, and noncaloric beverages in New York City supermarkets on purchasing, intake, and weight

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1002/oby.24058
Atene S. Poskute, Ian Yi Han Ang, Nabilah Rahman, Allan Geliebter
{"title":"Effects of discounting fruits, vegetables, and noncaloric beverages in New York City supermarkets on purchasing, intake, and weight","authors":"Atene S. Poskute,&nbsp;Ian Yi Han Ang,&nbsp;Nabilah Rahman,&nbsp;Allan Geliebter","doi":"10.1002/oby.24058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to assess purchasing, intake, and weight after discounting fruits and vegetables (F&amp;V) and noncaloric beverages in New York City supermarkets.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A 16-week randomized controlled trial was conducted with a 4-week baseline, an 8-week intervention with 50% discounts on F&amp;V and noncaloric beverages, and a 4-week follow-up. Purchasing was tracked via loyalty cards, and intake was tracked via 24-h dietary recalls. Weights were measured at five in-person visits.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data from 67 participants were analyzed (38 in the experimental group; 29 in the control group). F&amp;V and noncaloric beverage weekly purchasing was greater in the experimental than the control group (mean difference [SD], $4.64 [$1.44], <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001; $0.53 [$0.39], <i>p</i> = 0.008) during intervention, with F&amp;V purchasing remaining greater in the experimental versus control group during follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.005). F&amp;V intake was greater for the experimental than the control group during intervention (142 [105] g/day; <i>p</i> = 0.009) and follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.001). Although no difference in noncaloric beverage consumption was observed between groups, there was lower alcohol intake in the experimental than the control group during follow-up (−85.8 [60.2] g/day; <i>p</i> = 0.004). The experimental group lost weight compared with the control group (−1.33 [0.92] kg; <i>p</i> = 0.006 intervention and <i>p</i> = 0.106 follow-up). No differences in nutrient composition or high energy-dense product consumption were found.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A 50% discount on F&amp;V and noncaloric beverages promoted increased purchasing and intake of F&amp;V and induced weight loss.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":215,"journal":{"name":"Obesity","volume":"32 7","pages":"1290-1301"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oby.24058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study was to assess purchasing, intake, and weight after discounting fruits and vegetables (F&V) and noncaloric beverages in New York City supermarkets.

Methods

A 16-week randomized controlled trial was conducted with a 4-week baseline, an 8-week intervention with 50% discounts on F&V and noncaloric beverages, and a 4-week follow-up. Purchasing was tracked via loyalty cards, and intake was tracked via 24-h dietary recalls. Weights were measured at five in-person visits.

Results

Data from 67 participants were analyzed (38 in the experimental group; 29 in the control group). F&V and noncaloric beverage weekly purchasing was greater in the experimental than the control group (mean difference [SD], $4.64 [$1.44], p < 0.0001; $0.53 [$0.39], p = 0.008) during intervention, with F&V purchasing remaining greater in the experimental versus control group during follow-up (p = 0.005). F&V intake was greater for the experimental than the control group during intervention (142 [105] g/day; p = 0.009) and follow-up (p = 0.001). Although no difference in noncaloric beverage consumption was observed between groups, there was lower alcohol intake in the experimental than the control group during follow-up (−85.8 [60.2] g/day; p = 0.004). The experimental group lost weight compared with the control group (−1.33 [0.92] kg; p = 0.006 intervention and p = 0.106 follow-up). No differences in nutrient composition or high energy-dense product consumption were found.

Conclusions

A 50% discount on F&V and noncaloric beverages promoted increased purchasing and intake of F&V and induced weight loss.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纽约市超市水果、蔬菜和无热量饮料打折对购买量、摄入量和体重的影响。
研究目的本研究的目的是评估纽约市超市对水果蔬菜(F&V)和无热量饮料打折后的购买量、摄入量和体重:进行了一项为期 16 周的随机对照试验,基线期为 4 周,干预期为 8 周,果蔬和无热量饮料打五折,后续期为 4 周。购买情况通过会员卡进行跟踪,摄入量通过 24 小时膳食回顾进行跟踪。在五次上门访问中测量了体重:对 67 名参与者的数据进行了分析(实验组 38 人;对照组 29 人)。实验组每周购买的食品和饮料以及非热量饮料多于对照组(平均差异[SD]为 4.64 美元[1.44 美元],P餐饮和非热量饮料的半价优惠促进了餐饮和非热量饮料购买量和摄入量的增加,并促使体重减轻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity
Obesity 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
1.40%
发文量
261
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity is the official journal of The Obesity Society and is the premier source of information for increasing knowledge, fostering translational research from basic to population science, and promoting better treatment for people with obesity. Obesity publishes important peer-reviewed research and cutting-edge reviews, commentaries, and public health and medical developments.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Poster Abstracts Oral Abstracts Issue Information Cardiometabolic characteristics of weight cycling: results from a mid-South regional comprehensive health care system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1