The Value of Board Recertification Among Physicians.

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S464360
Katya Peri, Mark J Eisenberg
{"title":"The Value of Board Recertification Among Physicians.","authors":"Katya Peri, Mark J Eisenberg","doi":"10.2147/AMEP.S464360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An ongoing challenge among healthcare certifying organizations is identifying an effective manner of evaluating a physician's competency. The medical field is constantly changing, with new technology, research and pharmacology available, and physicians must be kept up to date in order to properly care for their patients. Maintenance of certification and specifically, recertification exams, are used to verify that a high standard of care is consistently met across all medical specialties. However, different countries have different structures in place to ensure physicians are kept abreast of the latest medical knowledge. For instance, American physicians must recertify themselves every ten years by passing a standardized exam to maintain their credentials. In comparison, Canadian physicians are not required to pass a formal examination. This contrast puts into question the value of the recertification exam in medical professional development programs. We outline the rectification situation in both Canada and the US and recommend MOC programs similar to Canada's, which does not require a recertification examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11199162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S464360","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An ongoing challenge among healthcare certifying organizations is identifying an effective manner of evaluating a physician's competency. The medical field is constantly changing, with new technology, research and pharmacology available, and physicians must be kept up to date in order to properly care for their patients. Maintenance of certification and specifically, recertification exams, are used to verify that a high standard of care is consistently met across all medical specialties. However, different countries have different structures in place to ensure physicians are kept abreast of the latest medical knowledge. For instance, American physicians must recertify themselves every ten years by passing a standardized exam to maintain their credentials. In comparison, Canadian physicians are not required to pass a formal examination. This contrast puts into question the value of the recertification exam in medical professional development programs. We outline the rectification situation in both Canada and the US and recommend MOC programs similar to Canada's, which does not require a recertification examination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医生重新获得执业资格的价值。
医疗保健认证机构一直面临的一个挑战是确定一种有效的方式来评估医生的能力。医疗领域在不断变化,新技术、新研究和新药学层出不穷,医生必须跟上时代的步伐,才能为病人提供适当的医疗服务。保持认证,特别是再认证考试,用于验证所有医学专科是否始终如一地达到了高标准的医疗水平。然而,不同国家有不同的结构来确保医生掌握最新的医学知识。例如,美国医生必须每十年通过一次标准化考试来重新认证自己,以保持其资格证书。相比之下,加拿大医生不需要通过正式考试。这种反差让人怀疑重新认证考试在医学专业发展计划中的价值。我们概述了加拿大和美国的纠正情况,并推荐了与加拿大类似的 MOC 计划,加拿大不要求重新认证考试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing and Validating Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Rheumatology Fellowship Training Programs in Saudi Arabia: A Delphi Study Students’ Perception of Peer- Students Mentoring Program “Big Sibling Mentoring Program” to Complement Faculty Mentoring of First-Year Medical Students in Saudi Arabia Incorporating Technology Adoption in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study of Medical Students’ Perspectives [Letter] Development, Implementation, and Assessment of an Online Modular Telehealth Curriculum for Health Professions Students [Letter] Competency of Nurses on Electrocardiogram Monitoring and Interpretation in Selected Hospitals of Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1