Is older age an appropriate criterion alone for ordering cervical spine computed tomography after trauma.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Academic Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1111/acem.14976
Mahla Radmard, Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Meisam Hoseinyazdi, Mona Shahriari, Javad R Azadi, Arjun Chanmugam, David M Yousem
{"title":"Is older age an appropriate criterion alone for ordering cervical spine computed tomography after trauma.","authors":"Mahla Radmard, Armin Tafazolimoghadam, Meisam Hoseinyazdi, Mona Shahriari, Javad R Azadi, Arjun Chanmugam, David M Yousem","doi":"10.1111/acem.14976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical spine computed tomography (CSCT) scans are frequently performed in older emergency department (ED) trauma patients based on the 65-year-old high-risk criterion of the Canadian Cervical Spine Rule (CCR). We sought to determine the positivity rate of CSCT scans in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients to assess the current applicability of age in the CCR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed CSCT ED reports from two institutional hospitals from 2018 to 2023. The primary variable was age; however, we also recorded fracture types and sites and type of treatments. Patients were separated into symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts. We used a Fisher's exact test to compare variables between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups and chi-square tests for comparison between age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 9455 CSCTs performed in patients ≥ 65 years, 192 (2.0%) fractures were identified (113 females); 28 (0.30%) were in asymptomatic patients. The rates of fractures (1.6%) and asymptomatic fractures (0.18%) were lowest in the 65- to 70-year age group. There were no distinguishing features as to the level or part of the vertebra fractured or surgical treatment rate between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cervical spine fractures in posttrauma patients ≥ 65 years are uncommon, with the lowest incidence in those 65 to 70 years old. Excluding asymptomatic individuals aged 65-70 from routine CSCT presents a minimal risk of missed fractures (0.18%). This prompts consideration for refining age-based screening and integrating shared decision making into the clinical protocol for this demographic, reflecting the low incidence of fractures and the changing health profile of the aging population.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14976","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical spine computed tomography (CSCT) scans are frequently performed in older emergency department (ED) trauma patients based on the 65-year-old high-risk criterion of the Canadian Cervical Spine Rule (CCR). We sought to determine the positivity rate of CSCT scans in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients to assess the current applicability of age in the CCR.

Methods: We reviewed CSCT ED reports from two institutional hospitals from 2018 to 2023. The primary variable was age; however, we also recorded fracture types and sites and type of treatments. Patients were separated into symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts. We used a Fisher's exact test to compare variables between the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups and chi-square tests for comparison between age groups.

Results: Of 9455 CSCTs performed in patients ≥ 65 years, 192 (2.0%) fractures were identified (113 females); 28 (0.30%) were in asymptomatic patients. The rates of fractures (1.6%) and asymptomatic fractures (0.18%) were lowest in the 65- to 70-year age group. There were no distinguishing features as to the level or part of the vertebra fractured or surgical treatment rate between asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.

Conclusions: Cervical spine fractures in posttrauma patients ≥ 65 years are uncommon, with the lowest incidence in those 65 to 70 years old. Excluding asymptomatic individuals aged 65-70 from routine CSCT presents a minimal risk of missed fractures (0.18%). This prompts consideration for refining age-based screening and integrating shared decision making into the clinical protocol for this demographic, reflecting the low incidence of fractures and the changing health profile of the aging population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外伤后颈椎计算机断层扫描检查是否仅以年龄为标准?
背景:根据加拿大颈椎规则(CCR)中的 65 岁高风险标准,对年龄较大的急诊科(ED)创伤患者经常进行颈椎计算机断层扫描(CSCT)。我们试图确定有症状和无症状患者的 CSCT 扫描阳性率,以评估年龄在 CCR 中的适用性:我们回顾了两家机构医院从 2018 年到 2023 年的 CSCT ED 报告。主要变量是年龄;不过,我们还记录了骨折类型和部位以及治疗类型。患者被分为有症状和无症状两组。我们使用费雪精确检验来比较无症状组和有症状组之间的变量,并使用卡方检验来比较不同年龄组之间的变量:在为年龄≥65岁的患者进行的9455例CSCT检查中,发现了192例(2.0%)骨折(113例女性);28例(0.30%)为无症状患者。65至70岁年龄组的骨折率(1.6%)和无症状骨折率(0.18%)最低。无症状和有症状的患者在椎体骨折的程度、部位或手术治疗率方面没有明显区别:结论:创伤后≥65岁患者的颈椎骨折并不常见,65至70岁患者的发病率最低。将无症状的 65-70 岁患者排除在常规 CSCT 之外,漏诊骨折的风险极低(0.18%)。这促使我们考虑完善基于年龄的筛查,并将共同决策纳入该人群的临床方案中,以反映骨折的低发病率和老龄人口不断变化的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Facilitators to implementing preventive health interventions for adolescents in the emergency department: A multicenter qualitative analysis. Risk-stratification tools for emergency department patients with syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct evidence for SAEM GRACE. Implications of inadequate communication: Emergency care for deaf and hard-of-hearing patients. Failure rate of D-dimer testing in patients with high clinical probability of pulmonary embolism: Ancillary analysis of three European studies. Miles to go before we sleep: Does increasing abdominal computed tomography utilization really improve patient-oriented outcomes?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1