Comparative evaluation of culture results and composition of microbiome of removed tonsils due to distant focal disease or other reasons. A prospective pilot study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica Pub Date : 2024-06-28 Print Date: 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1556/030.2024.02279
Zsolt Bella, Eszter Erdélyi, Ágnes Kiricsi, Veronika Gaál, Andrea Lázár, Gergely Maróti, Roland Wirth, József Sóki, Elisabeth Nagy
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of culture results and composition of microbiome of removed tonsils due to distant focal disease or other reasons. A prospective pilot study.","authors":"Zsolt Bella, Eszter Erdélyi, Ágnes Kiricsi, Veronika Gaál, Andrea Lázár, Gergely Maróti, Roland Wirth, József Sóki, Elisabeth Nagy","doi":"10.1556/030.2024.02279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this prospective pilot study was to compare culture and microbiome results of the removed tonsils of patients with assumed distant focal disease (11 patients) and those who underwent a tonsillectomy, due to other reasons, such as recurrent tonsillitis, tonsil stones or snoring (nine patients). Aerobic culture was carried out for samples taken from the surface of the tonsils by swabs before tonsillectomy for all 20 patients. The squeezed detritus and the tissue samples of removed tonsils, taken separately for the right and left tonsils, were incubated aerobically and anaerobically. The microbiome composition of tissue samples of removed tonsils was also evaluated. Based on the culture results of the deep samples Staphylococcus aureus was the dominating pathogen, besides a great variety of anaerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria present in the oral microbiota in those patients who underwent tonsillectomy due to distant focal diseases. Microbiome study of the core tissue samples showed a great diversity on genus and species level among patients of the two groups however, S. aureus and Prevotella nigrescens were present in higher proportion in those, whose tonsils were removed due to distant focal diseases. Our results may support previous findings about the possible triggering role of S. aureus and P. nigrescens leading to distant focal diseases. Samples taken by squeezing the tonsils could give more information about the possible pathogenic/triggering bacteria than the surface samples cultured only aerobically.</p>","PeriodicalId":7119,"journal":{"name":"Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica","volume":" ","pages":"182-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/030.2024.02279","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this prospective pilot study was to compare culture and microbiome results of the removed tonsils of patients with assumed distant focal disease (11 patients) and those who underwent a tonsillectomy, due to other reasons, such as recurrent tonsillitis, tonsil stones or snoring (nine patients). Aerobic culture was carried out for samples taken from the surface of the tonsils by swabs before tonsillectomy for all 20 patients. The squeezed detritus and the tissue samples of removed tonsils, taken separately for the right and left tonsils, were incubated aerobically and anaerobically. The microbiome composition of tissue samples of removed tonsils was also evaluated. Based on the culture results of the deep samples Staphylococcus aureus was the dominating pathogen, besides a great variety of anaerobic and facultative anaerobic bacteria present in the oral microbiota in those patients who underwent tonsillectomy due to distant focal diseases. Microbiome study of the core tissue samples showed a great diversity on genus and species level among patients of the two groups however, S. aureus and Prevotella nigrescens were present in higher proportion in those, whose tonsils were removed due to distant focal diseases. Our results may support previous findings about the possible triggering role of S. aureus and P. nigrescens leading to distant focal diseases. Samples taken by squeezing the tonsils could give more information about the possible pathogenic/triggering bacteria than the surface samples cultured only aerobically.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对因远处病灶或其他原因切除的扁桃体的培养结果和微生物群组成进行比较评估。一项前瞻性试验研究。
这项前瞻性试验研究的目的是比较假定患有远处病灶疾病的患者(11 人)和因复发性扁桃体炎、扁桃体结石或鼾症等其他原因而接受扁桃体切除术的患者(9 人)所切除扁桃体的培养和微生物组结果。对所有 20 名患者在扁桃体切除术前用拭子从扁桃体表面采集的样本进行了需氧培养。对挤压的残渣和切除的扁桃体组织样本分别进行有氧和无氧培养。此外,还对摘除扁桃体组织样本的微生物群组成进行了评估。根据深层样本的培养结果,金黄色葡萄球菌是主要病原体,此外,因远处病灶疾病而接受扁桃体切除术的患者口腔微生物群中还存在大量厌氧菌和兼性厌氧菌。对核心组织样本进行的微生物组学研究显示,两组患者的菌属和菌种具有很大的多样性,但因远处病灶性疾病而切除扁桃体的患者中,金黄色葡萄球菌和黑前孢子菌的比例较高。我们的研究结果可能支持了之前的发现,即金黄色葡萄球菌和黑斑普雷沃氏菌可能是导致远处病灶疾病的诱因。与只进行有氧培养的表面样本相比,通过挤压扁桃体采集的样本能提供更多有关可能的致病/诱发细菌的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AMIH is devoted to the publication of research in all fields of medical microbiology (bacteriology, virology, parasitology, mycology); immunology of infectious diseases and study of the microbiome related to human diseases.
期刊最新文献
The role of intratumoral microbiota in the occurrence and progression of tumors and its implications for guiding tumor treatment. Antimicrobial susceptibilities and genomic characteristics of mupirocin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Tehran, Iran. Intracellular Aspergillus niger conidia in alveolar macrophages: A diagnostic clue in a lung transplant recipient. The impact of gut microbiota modulation on responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer. Detection of vancomycin and teicoplanin resistance in Staphylococcus isolates: Which method is more reliable?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1