Effects of Natural Sound Therapy on Pain and Agitation Induced by Endotracheal Suctioning: A Real-World Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024570
Qianwen Ruan, Chuanxiong Li, Meihua Qiu, Linjun Wan, Tong Sun
{"title":"Effects of Natural Sound Therapy on Pain and Agitation Induced by Endotracheal Suctioning: A Real-World Study.","authors":"Qianwen Ruan, Chuanxiong Li, Meihua Qiu, Linjun Wan, Tong Sun","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Music therapy has been used as a complementary intervention to provide synergistic analgesia for various procedures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effects of natural sound therapy on pain intensity and agitation scores in intubated adult Chinese patients who received endotracheal suctioning in a critical care unit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective, real-world, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted from July 2021 through February 2022 among intubated surgical intensive care unit patients in a Chinese hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to a control group receiving conventional treatment or an intervention group receiving natural sound therapy plus conventional treatment (50 patients in each group). Patients' pain intensity and agitation levels were analyzed before, during, immediately after, 5 minutes after, and 15 minutes after completion of endotracheal suctioning. Pain intensity was assessed with the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT); agitation was assessed with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to CPOT scores, patients in the intervention group had significant relief of pain intensity during, immediately after, and 5 minutes after endotracheal suctioning compared with patients in the control group (all P < .001). The RASS scores showed that agitation levels were significant lower in the intervention group than in the control group during (P = .002) and immediately after (P < .001) endotracheal suctioning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world study, natural sound therapy was part of a holistic bundle of interventions used to reduce pain and agitation in surgical intensive care unit patients during endotracheal suctioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Music therapy has been used as a complementary intervention to provide synergistic analgesia for various procedures.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of natural sound therapy on pain intensity and agitation scores in intubated adult Chinese patients who received endotracheal suctioning in a critical care unit.

Methods: A prospective, real-world, randomized, double-blind, controlled study was conducted from July 2021 through February 2022 among intubated surgical intensive care unit patients in a Chinese hospital. Patients were randomly assigned to a control group receiving conventional treatment or an intervention group receiving natural sound therapy plus conventional treatment (50 patients in each group). Patients' pain intensity and agitation levels were analyzed before, during, immediately after, 5 minutes after, and 15 minutes after completion of endotracheal suctioning. Pain intensity was assessed with the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT); agitation was assessed with the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS).

Results: According to CPOT scores, patients in the intervention group had significant relief of pain intensity during, immediately after, and 5 minutes after endotracheal suctioning compared with patients in the control group (all P < .001). The RASS scores showed that agitation levels were significant lower in the intervention group than in the control group during (P = .002) and immediately after (P < .001) endotracheal suctioning.

Conclusions: In this real-world study, natural sound therapy was part of a holistic bundle of interventions used to reduce pain and agitation in surgical intensive care unit patients during endotracheal suctioning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自然声音疗法对气管内抽吸引起的疼痛和躁动的影响:真实世界研究
背景:音乐疗法已被用作一种辅助干预措施,为各种手术提供协同镇痛:评估自然声音疗法对在重症监护病房接受气管插管吸引的中国成年患者疼痛强度和躁动评分的影响:一项前瞻性、真实世界、随机、双盲、对照研究于 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 2 月在一家中国医院的外科重症监护病房插管患者中进行。患者被随机分配到接受常规治疗的对照组或接受自然声疗法加常规治疗的干预组(每组 50 人)。在气管插管前、插管过程中、插管后5分钟和插管后15分钟,对患者的疼痛强度和躁动程度进行分析。疼痛强度采用危重症疼痛观察工具(CPOT)进行评估;躁动采用里士满躁动-镇静量表(RASS)进行评估:根据 CPOT 评分,与对照组患者相比,干预组患者在气管内吸痰过程中、吸痰后和吸痰后 5 分钟的疼痛强度明显减轻(所有 P < .001)。RASS 评分显示,干预组患者在气管内吸痰期间(P = .002)和吸痰后立即(P < .001)的躁动程度明显低于对照组:在这项真实世界的研究中,自然声音疗法是用于减少外科重症监护病房患者在气管内吸引过程中疼痛和躁动的整体干预措施的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis to Assess Energy Expenditure in Critically Ill Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study. Clinical Pearls. Courage to Soar in Clinical Research. Discussion Guide for the Krupp Article. E Is for Early Mobility and Improved Patient Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1