Noninvasive Ventilation for Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to COVID-19.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024663
Alexander A Botsch, Michael J Oravec, Brandon T Rapier, Laine M Goff, Ashley L Desmett
{"title":"Noninvasive Ventilation for Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Due to COVID-19.","authors":"Alexander A Botsch, Michael J Oravec, Brandon T Rapier, Laine M Goff, Ashley L Desmett","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Use of noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is debated. The COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges due to high patient volumes and worldwide resource strain.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine associations between use of noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, progression to intubation, and hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients in an institutional COVID-19 registry. Adult patients were included if they were admitted for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2022, and developed moderate to severe ARDS. Primary outcomes were progression to intubation and hospital mortality in patients who received noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation. A secondary outcome was successful treatment with noninvasive ventilation without intubation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 823 patients who met inclusion criteria, 454 (55.2%) did not receive noninvasive ventilation and 369 (44.8%) received noninvasive ventilation. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation were more likely to require mechanical ventilation than were patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation. Among patients requiring endotracheal intubation, those receiving noninvasive ventilation had a higher likelihood of mortality. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation had lower severity-adjusted odds of survival to discharge without intubation than did patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with noninvasive ventilation had increased likelihood of progression to endotracheal intubation and hospital mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 4","pages":"260-269"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024663","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Use of noninvasive ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is debated. The COVID-19 pandemic posed challenges due to high patient volumes and worldwide resource strain.

Objectives: To determine associations between use of noninvasive ventilation in adult patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, progression to intubation, and hospital mortality.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients in an institutional COVID-19 registry. Adult patients were included if they were admitted for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and March 31, 2022, and developed moderate to severe ARDS. Primary outcomes were progression to intubation and hospital mortality in patients who received noninvasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation. A secondary outcome was successful treatment with noninvasive ventilation without intubation.

Results: Of 823 patients who met inclusion criteria, 454 (55.2%) did not receive noninvasive ventilation and 369 (44.8%) received noninvasive ventilation. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation were more likely to require mechanical ventilation than were patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation. Among patients requiring endotracheal intubation, those receiving noninvasive ventilation had a higher likelihood of mortality. Patients receiving noninvasive ventilation had lower severity-adjusted odds of survival to discharge without intubation than did patients not receiving noninvasive ventilation.

Conclusion: Patients with moderate to severe ARDS due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia treated with noninvasive ventilation had increased likelihood of progression to endotracheal intubation and hospital mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无创通气治疗 COVID-19 引起的中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征。
背景:对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者使用无创通气存在争议。COVID-19 大流行带来了大量患者和全球资源紧张的挑战:目的:确定因 SARS-CoV-2 肺炎导致中度至重度 ARDS 的成人患者使用无创通气、插管进展和住院死亡率之间的关系:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了 COVID-19 登记机构的患者。在 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2022 年 3 月 31 日期间因 COVID-19 入院并出现中度至重度 ARDS 的成人患者均被纳入研究范围。主要结果是接受无创通气或机械通气患者的插管进展和住院死亡率。次要结果是在不插管的情况下成功接受无创通气治疗:在符合纳入标准的 823 名患者中,454 人(55.2%)未接受无创通气治疗,369 人(44.8%)接受了无创通气治疗。与未接受无创通气的患者相比,接受无创通气的患者更有可能需要机械通气。在需要气管插管的患者中,接受无创通气的患者死亡率较高。与未接受无创通气的患者相比,接受无创通气的患者在未插管的情况下出院的严重程度调整后存活几率更低:结论:接受无创通气治疗的 SARS-CoV-2 肺炎导致的中重度 ARDS 患者发展为气管插管和住院死亡的可能性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Association of Area Deprivation Index With Mortality in Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19. Chest Discomfort After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the Wool Article. Factors Associated With Parent-Perceived Miscommunication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1