Nurses' Understanding and Practice of Minimal Stimulation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024104
Shelley Burcie, Angelica Morris, Virginia Young, Zara Sajwani-Merchant, Lindsey Patton
{"title":"Nurses' Understanding and Practice of Minimal Stimulation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.","authors":"Shelley Burcie, Angelica Morris, Virginia Young, Zara Sajwani-Merchant, Lindsey Patton","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pediatric patients receiving neurologic and neurosurgical critical care undergo many procedures that result in stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, which increases their risk of poor outcomes. Nurses typically implement a variety of interventions to minimize such stimulation; however, minimal stimulation has not been specifically defined in the literature or described as a standardized bundle of care.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine pediatric intensive care unit nurses' interpretation and practice of minimal stimulation in patients with neurologic and neurosurgical conditions and specifically to triangulate nurses' descriptions of this practice with related findings in the literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative, descriptive, exploratory study that used naturalistic inquiry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 13 pediatric intensive care unit nurses participated in the study. Three primary themes were identified regarding minimal stimulation: (1) new knowledge and practice, (2) communication, and (3) impact of minimal stimulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study help to establish a working definition of the nursing practice of minimal stimulation and provide a basis for future research. More detailed study is needed on the concept of a standardized minimal stimulation bundle and its impact on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 4","pages":"272-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024104","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pediatric patients receiving neurologic and neurosurgical critical care undergo many procedures that result in stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system, which increases their risk of poor outcomes. Nurses typically implement a variety of interventions to minimize such stimulation; however, minimal stimulation has not been specifically defined in the literature or described as a standardized bundle of care.

Objective: To examine pediatric intensive care unit nurses' interpretation and practice of minimal stimulation in patients with neurologic and neurosurgical conditions and specifically to triangulate nurses' descriptions of this practice with related findings in the literature.

Methods: This was a qualitative, descriptive, exploratory study that used naturalistic inquiry.

Results: A total of 13 pediatric intensive care unit nurses participated in the study. Three primary themes were identified regarding minimal stimulation: (1) new knowledge and practice, (2) communication, and (3) impact of minimal stimulation.

Conclusions: The findings of this study help to establish a working definition of the nursing practice of minimal stimulation and provide a basis for future research. More detailed study is needed on the concept of a standardized minimal stimulation bundle and its impact on patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科重症监护室护士对最小刺激的理解和实践。
背景:接受神经和神经外科重症监护的儿科患者在接受许多程序时都会受到交感神经系统的刺激,这增加了他们不良预后的风险。护士通常会采取各种干预措施来尽量减少这种刺激;然而,文献中并未对最小刺激进行具体定义,也未将其描述为标准化的护理捆绑:研究儿科重症监护病房护士对神经系统和神经外科患者最小刺激的解释和实践,特别是将护士对这一实践的描述与文献中的相关研究结果进行三角测量:这是一项定性、描述性、探索性研究,采用自然调查法:共有 13 名儿科重症监护室护士参与了研究。确定了有关最小刺激的三个主要主题:(1)新知识和实践;(2)沟通;(3)最小刺激的影响:本研究的结果有助于确立最小刺激护理实践的工作定义,并为今后的研究奠定基础。需要对标准化最小刺激捆绑概念及其对患者预后的影响进行更详细的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Association of Area Deprivation Index With Mortality in Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19. Chest Discomfort After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the Wool Article. Factors Associated With Parent-Perceived Miscommunication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1