Clinical Assessment of Subjective Visual and Haptic Vertical Norms in Healthy Adults.

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae049
Charlotte van der Waal, Wim Saeys, Steven Truijen, Elissa Embrechts
{"title":"Clinical Assessment of Subjective Visual and Haptic Vertical Norms in Healthy Adults.","authors":"Charlotte van der Waal, Wim Saeys, Steven Truijen, Elissa Embrechts","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acae049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Accurate verticality perception is essential for daily life activities, such as correctly estimating object orientation in space. This study established normative data for the subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective haptic vertical (SHV) using the portable and self-constructable modified Bucket test and Rotating-Column test. Additionally, the contribution of age, sex, and starting position of the line/ column on SVV and SHV accuracy were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study, part of the PRECISE project (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05978596), was conducted following the STROBE guidelines. Healthy adults without visual/neurological/vestibular disorders were recruited. Subjective visual vertical and SHV accuracy were described in terms of constant errors (i.e., mean deviation from 0° [true vertical] respecting its direction), unsigned errors (i.e., mean deviation from 0° irrespective of direction), and variability (i.e., intra-individual standard deviation).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were evaluated (mean age: 41.14 [SD = 16.74] years). Subjective visual vertical constant errors between -2.82° and 2.90°, unsigned errors up to 2.15°, and variability up to 1.61° are considered normal. Subjective haptic vertical constant errors ranged from -6.94° to 8.18°, unsigned errors up to 6.66° and variability up to 4.25°. Higher ages led to higher SVV unsigned errors and variability. SHV variability was higher in females compared to males. Certain starting positions led to higher SVV and SHV constants and SVV unsigned errors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Normative data are provided for affordable, self-constructable, and portable SVV and SHV tools. These norms are consistent with more sophisticated equipment and can be used to distinguish between normal and abnormal values.</p>","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1408-1417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acae049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Accurate verticality perception is essential for daily life activities, such as correctly estimating object orientation in space. This study established normative data for the subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective haptic vertical (SHV) using the portable and self-constructable modified Bucket test and Rotating-Column test. Additionally, the contribution of age, sex, and starting position of the line/ column on SVV and SHV accuracy were evaluated.

Method: This study, part of the PRECISE project (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05978596), was conducted following the STROBE guidelines. Healthy adults without visual/neurological/vestibular disorders were recruited. Subjective visual vertical and SHV accuracy were described in terms of constant errors (i.e., mean deviation from 0° [true vertical] respecting its direction), unsigned errors (i.e., mean deviation from 0° irrespective of direction), and variability (i.e., intra-individual standard deviation).

Results: Sixty participants were evaluated (mean age: 41.14 [SD = 16.74] years). Subjective visual vertical constant errors between -2.82° and 2.90°, unsigned errors up to 2.15°, and variability up to 1.61° are considered normal. Subjective haptic vertical constant errors ranged from -6.94° to 8.18°, unsigned errors up to 6.66° and variability up to 4.25°. Higher ages led to higher SVV unsigned errors and variability. SHV variability was higher in females compared to males. Certain starting positions led to higher SVV and SHV constants and SVV unsigned errors.

Discussion: Normative data are provided for affordable, self-constructable, and portable SVV and SHV tools. These norms are consistent with more sophisticated equipment and can be used to distinguish between normal and abnormal values.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
健康成年人主观视觉和触觉垂直规范的临床评估。
背景和目的:准确的垂直感知对日常生活活动至关重要,例如正确估计物体在空间中的方位。本研究利用便携式自构造改良水桶测试和旋转柱测试,建立了主观视觉垂直度(SVV)和主观触觉垂直度(SHV)的标准数据。此外,还评估了年龄、性别和线/柱的起始位置对 SVV 和 SHV 准确性的影响:本研究是 PRECISE 项目(ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT05978596)的一部分,按照 STROBE 指南进行。研究招募了无视觉/神经/前庭疾病的健康成年人。主观视觉垂直和SHV准确度用恒定误差(即与0°[真实垂直]方向的平均偏差)、无符号误差(即与0°方向的平均偏差,与方向无关)和变异性(即个体内部标准偏差)来描述:对 60 名参与者进行了评估(平均年龄:41.14 [SD = 16.74] 岁)。主观视觉垂直常数误差在 -2.82° 和 2.90° 之间,无符号误差不超过 2.15°,变异性不超过 1.61°,均视为正常。主观触觉垂直常数误差在-6.94°到8.18°之间,无符号误差最大为6.66°,变异性最大为4.25°。年龄越大,SVV 的无符号误差和变异性越高。与男性相比,女性的 SHV 变异性更高。某些起始位置会导致较高的 SVV 和 SHV 常数以及 SVV 无符号误差:为经济实惠、可自行构建和便携式 SVV 和 SHV 工具提供了规范数据。这些标准与更复杂的设备一致,可用于区分正常值和异常值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
358
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.
期刊最新文献
Language and Cognitive Impairments in Multiple Sclerosis: a Comparative Study of RRMS and SPMS Patients. Relationship Between Cognitive Estimation, Executive Functions, and Theory of Mind in Patients With Prefrontal Cortex Damage. Improving Access to Dementia Care in the Era of Monoclonal Antibody Treatments for Alzheimer's Disease: a Pilot Clinical Protocol Using Abbreviated Neuropsychological Assessment. Anticholinergic Medication Burden and Cognitive Subtypes in Parkinson's Disease without Dementia. Examining the role of depression on the relationship between performance-based and self-reported cognitive functioning after sport-related concussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1