Impact of Wheelchair Seating Systems on Scoliosis Progression for Children With Neurologic and Neuromuscular Disorders: A Retrospective Study of Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating and Modular Wheelchair Seating

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.007
{"title":"Impact of Wheelchair Seating Systems on Scoliosis Progression for Children With Neurologic and Neuromuscular Disorders: A Retrospective Study of Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating and Modular Wheelchair Seating","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2024.06.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To retrospectively evaluate the comparative effect of 2 wheelchair seating systems, Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating (CCS) and Modular Wheelchair Seating (MWS), on scoliosis progression in children with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders and to determine any predictors for scoliosis progression.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>A national health service regional posture and mobility service.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Nonambulant pediatric wheelchair users with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders (N=75; 36 men, 39 women; mean age at seating intervention, 10.50±3.97y) issued CCS and MWS by the South Wales Posture and Mobility Service from 2012-2022.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Two specialized wheelchair seating systems, CCS and MWS.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>A generalized least squares model was used to estimate the effect of seat type on Cobb angle over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 75 participants enrolled, 51% had cerebral palsy. Fifty were issued CCS and 25 were issued MWS. Baseline Cobb angle was 32.9±18.9° for the MWS group and 48.0±31.0° for the CCS group. The generalized least squares model demonstrated that time since seating intervention (χ<sup>2</sup>=122, <em>P</em>&lt;.0001), seating type (χ<sup>2</sup>=52.5, <em>P</em>&lt;.0001), and baseline scoliosis severity (χ<sup>2</sup>=41.6, <em>P</em>&lt;.0001) were predictive of scoliosis progression. Condition was not a strong predictor (χ<sup>2</sup>=9.96, <em>P</em> =.0069), and sex (χ<sup>2</sup>=5.67, <em>P</em>=.13) and age at intervention (χ<sup>2</sup>=4.47, <em>P</em>=.35) were not predictive. Estimated contrasts of medical condition with seat type over time demonstrated smaller differences between MWS and CCS over time. Predicted scoliosis velocity was found to attenuate with use of CCS over time compared with MWS, although scoliosis deteriorated regardless of intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings showed pediatric wheelchair users with neurologic and neuromuscular disorders prescribed CCS showed greater mitigation of scoliosis progression over time compared with those issued MWS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"105 10","pages":"Pages 1921-1929"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999324010669","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To retrospectively evaluate the comparative effect of 2 wheelchair seating systems, Custom-Contoured Wheelchair Seating (CCS) and Modular Wheelchair Seating (MWS), on scoliosis progression in children with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders and to determine any predictors for scoliosis progression.

Design

Longitudinal, retrospective cohort study.

Setting

A national health service regional posture and mobility service.

Participants

Nonambulant pediatric wheelchair users with neuromuscular and neurologic disorders (N=75; 36 men, 39 women; mean age at seating intervention, 10.50±3.97y) issued CCS and MWS by the South Wales Posture and Mobility Service from 2012-2022.

Interventions

Two specialized wheelchair seating systems, CCS and MWS.

Main Outcome Measures

A generalized least squares model was used to estimate the effect of seat type on Cobb angle over time.

Results

Of the 75 participants enrolled, 51% had cerebral palsy. Fifty were issued CCS and 25 were issued MWS. Baseline Cobb angle was 32.9±18.9° for the MWS group and 48.0±31.0° for the CCS group. The generalized least squares model demonstrated that time since seating intervention (χ2=122, P<.0001), seating type (χ2=52.5, P<.0001), and baseline scoliosis severity (χ2=41.6, P<.0001) were predictive of scoliosis progression. Condition was not a strong predictor (χ2=9.96, P =.0069), and sex (χ2=5.67, P=.13) and age at intervention (χ2=4.47, P=.35) were not predictive. Estimated contrasts of medical condition with seat type over time demonstrated smaller differences between MWS and CCS over time. Predicted scoliosis velocity was found to attenuate with use of CCS over time compared with MWS, although scoliosis deteriorated regardless of intervention.

Conclusions

Our findings showed pediatric wheelchair users with neurologic and neuromuscular disorders prescribed CCS showed greater mitigation of scoliosis progression over time compared with those issued MWS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轮椅座椅系统对患有神经和神经肌肉疾病的儿童脊柱侧弯进展的影响:对定制轮椅座椅和模块化轮椅座椅的回顾性研究。
研究目的回顾性评估两种轮椅座椅系统(定制轮椅座椅(CCS)和模块化轮椅座椅(MWS))对患有神经肌肉和神经系统疾病的儿童脊柱侧凸进展的影响,并确定脊柱侧凸进展的预测因素:设计:纵向回顾性队列研究:设计:纵向回顾性队列研究2012年至2022年期间,南威尔士姿势和移动能力服务机构向患有神经肌肉和神经系统疾病的非步行儿科轮椅使用者(N = 75;36名男性,39名女性;座椅干预时的平均年龄为10.50 ± 3.97岁)发放了CCS和MWS:干预措施:两种专用轮椅座椅系统,CCS和MWS:采用广义最小二乘法(GLS)模型估算座椅类型随时间变化对Cobb角的影响:在 75 名参与者中,51% 患有脑瘫。其中 50 人获得了 CCS,25 人获得了 MWS。MWS组的基线Cobb角为32.9±18.9°,CCS组为48.0±31.0°。GLS模型显示,座椅干预后的时间(χ2 = 122,p < .0001)、座椅类型(χ2 = 52.5,p < .0001)和基线脊柱侧凸严重程度(χ2 = 41.6,p < .0001)可预测脊柱侧凸的进展。病情不是一个强有力的预测因素(χ2 = 9.96,p = .0069),性别(χ2 = 5.67,p = .13)和干预时的年龄(χ2 = 4.47,p = .35)也不是预测因素。医疗条件与座椅类型随时间变化的估计对比显示,MWS 和 CCS 随时间变化的差异较小。随着时间的推移,与MWS相比,使用CCS时预测的脊柱侧弯速度会减慢,但无论采取何种干预措施,脊柱侧弯都会恶化:我们的研究结果表明,与使用MWS的儿童轮椅使用者相比,使用CCS的神经和神经肌肉疾病儿童轮椅使用者的脊柱侧弯进展随着时间的推移得到了更大程度的缓解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
495
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities. Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.
期刊最新文献
The Intersection Model Between Rehabilitation Medicine and Complementary and Integrative Medicine Sciences. Increased stiffness is evidenced in the deep but not superficial lumbar multifidus muscle in professional athletes with chronic low back pain. Effectiveness of a community-based exercise program for ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness of micro-electrolysis associated with exercises versus exercises alone on pain intensity and disability in individuals with chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: A randomized clinical trial. Longitudinal goal attainment with repeat injections of abobotulinumtoxinA in adults with lower limb spasticity: Results from a prospective observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1