Reliability of single-lead electrocardiogram interpretation to detect atrial fibrillation: insights from the SAFER feasibility study.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Europace Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1093/europace/euae181
Katie Hibbitt, James Brimicombe, Martin R Cowie, Andrew Dymond, Ben Freedman, Simon J Griffin, F D R Ichard Hobbs, Hannah Clair Lindén, Gregory Y H Lip, Jonathan Mant, Richard J McManus, Madhumitha Pandiaraja, Kate Williams, Peter H Charlton
{"title":"Reliability of single-lead electrocardiogram interpretation to detect atrial fibrillation: insights from the SAFER feasibility study.","authors":"Katie Hibbitt, James Brimicombe, Martin R Cowie, Andrew Dymond, Ben Freedman, Simon J Griffin, F D R Ichard Hobbs, Hannah Clair Lindén, Gregory Y H Lip, Jonathan Mant, Richard J McManus, Madhumitha Pandiaraja, Kate Williams, Peter H Charlton","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) can be recorded using widely available devices such as smartwatches and handheld ECG recorders. Such devices have been approved for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. However, little evidence exists on the reliability of single-lead ECG interpretation. We aimed to assess the level of agreement on detection of AF by independent cardiologists interpreting single-lead ECGs and to identify factors influencing agreement.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>In a population-based AF screening study, adults aged ≥65 years old recorded four single-lead ECGs per day for 1-4 weeks using a handheld ECG recorder. Electrocardiograms showing signs of possible AF were identified by a nurse, aided by an automated algorithm. These were reviewed by two independent cardiologists who assigned participant- and ECG-level diagnoses. Inter-rater reliability of AF diagnosis was calculated using linear weighted Cohen's kappa (κw). Out of 2141 participants and 162 515 ECGs, only 1843 ECGs from 185 participants were reviewed by both cardiologists. Agreement was moderate: κw = 0.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.58) at participant level and κw = 0.58 (0.53-0.62) at ECG level. At participant level, agreement was associated with the number of adequate-quality ECGs recorded, with higher agreement in participants who recorded at least 67 adequate-quality ECGs. At ECG level, agreement was associated with ECG quality and whether ECGs exhibited algorithm-identified possible AF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inter-rater reliability of AF diagnosis from single-lead ECGs was found to be moderate in older adults. Strategies to improve reliability might include participant and cardiologist training and designing AF detection programmes to obtain sufficient ECGs for reliable diagnoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae181","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Single-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) can be recorded using widely available devices such as smartwatches and handheld ECG recorders. Such devices have been approved for atrial fibrillation (AF) detection. However, little evidence exists on the reliability of single-lead ECG interpretation. We aimed to assess the level of agreement on detection of AF by independent cardiologists interpreting single-lead ECGs and to identify factors influencing agreement.

Methods and results: In a population-based AF screening study, adults aged ≥65 years old recorded four single-lead ECGs per day for 1-4 weeks using a handheld ECG recorder. Electrocardiograms showing signs of possible AF were identified by a nurse, aided by an automated algorithm. These were reviewed by two independent cardiologists who assigned participant- and ECG-level diagnoses. Inter-rater reliability of AF diagnosis was calculated using linear weighted Cohen's kappa (κw). Out of 2141 participants and 162 515 ECGs, only 1843 ECGs from 185 participants were reviewed by both cardiologists. Agreement was moderate: κw = 0.48 (95% confidence interval, 0.37-0.58) at participant level and κw = 0.58 (0.53-0.62) at ECG level. At participant level, agreement was associated with the number of adequate-quality ECGs recorded, with higher agreement in participants who recorded at least 67 adequate-quality ECGs. At ECG level, agreement was associated with ECG quality and whether ECGs exhibited algorithm-identified possible AF.

Conclusion: Inter-rater reliability of AF diagnosis from single-lead ECGs was found to be moderate in older adults. Strategies to improve reliability might include participant and cardiologist training and designing AF detection programmes to obtain sufficient ECGs for reliable diagnoses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单导联心电图解读检测心房颤动的可靠性:SAFER 可行性研究的启示。
背景和目的:单导联心电图(ECG)可通过智能手表和手持式心电图记录仪等广泛使用的设备记录。此类设备已被批准用于检测心房颤动(房颤)。然而,有关单导联心电图解读可靠性的证据却很少。我们旨在评估独立心脏病专家解读单导联心电图对房颤检测的一致程度,并找出影响一致程度的因素:在一项基于人群的房颤筛查研究中,年龄≥65 岁的成年人使用手持式心电图记录仪每天记录四张单导联心电图,持续 1-4 周。显示可能存在房颤迹象的心电图由一名护士在自动算法的辅助下进行识别。两名独立的心脏病专家对这些心电图进行审查,并做出参与者和心电图级别的诊断。心房颤动诊断的评分者间可靠性采用线性加权科恩卡帕(kw)进行计算:结果:在 2,141 名参与者和 162,515 张心电图中,只有来自 185 名参与者的 1,843 张心电图由两名心脏病专家共同审查。一致性为中等:参与者层面的一致性为 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37-0.58);心电图层面的一致性为 0.58 (0.53-0.62)。在参与者层面,一致性与记录的高质量心电图数量有关,记录至少 67 张高质量心电图的参与者一致性更高。在心电图层面,一致性与心电图质量和心电图是否显示算法识别的可能房颤有关:结论:根据单导联心电图诊断房颤的评分者间可靠性在老年人中处于中等水平。提高可靠性的策略可能包括对参与者和心脏病专家进行培训,以及设计心房颤动检测计划以获取足够的心电图进行可靠诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Multielectrode Catheter-Based Pulsed Electric Field Versus Cryoballoon For Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Familial risk of sinus node dysfunction indicating pacemaker implantation: A nation-wide cohort study. Increased Pacemaker Implantation and Mortality Rates in Relatives of Patients with Early-Onset Sinus Node Dysfunction: Can Genetics Explain All? aTrial arrhythmias in inhEriTed aRrhythmIa Syndromes: results from the TETRIS study. Temperature guided high and very high-power short duration ablation for atrial fibrillation treatment - The peQasus multicentre study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1