Gallbladder fossa nodularity in the liver as observed in alcoholic liver disease patients: Analysis based on hepatobiliary phase signal intensity on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and extracellular volume fraction calculated from routine CT data.

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Global health & medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-30 DOI:10.35772/ghm.2023.01085
Keisuke Sato, Shinji Tanaka, Hiroshi Urakawa, Ryo Murayama, Eiko Hisatomi, Yukihisa Takayama, Kengo Yoshimitsu
{"title":"Gallbladder fossa nodularity in the liver as observed in alcoholic liver disease patients: Analysis based on hepatobiliary phase signal intensity on gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and extracellular volume fraction calculated from routine CT data.","authors":"Keisuke Sato, Shinji Tanaka, Hiroshi Urakawa, Ryo Murayama, Eiko Hisatomi, Yukihisa Takayama, Kengo Yoshimitsu","doi":"10.35772/ghm.2023.01085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to further verify the concept utilizing signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) calculated from CT data. Between Jan 2013 and September 2018, consecutive ALD patients who had both quadruple phase CT and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI within six months were retrospectively recruited. Those who had any intervention or disease involvement around gallbladder fossa were excluded. All images were reviewed and ECV was measured by two experienced radiologists. GBFN grades, and their HBP signal intensity or ECV relative to the surrounding background liver (BGL) were analyzed. There were 48 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There were GBFN grade 0/1/2/3 in 11/15/18/4 patients, respectively. The signal intensity on HBP relative to BGL were iso/slightly high/high in 30/15/3 patients, respectively, and ECV ratio (ECV of GBFN divided by that of BGL) was 0.88 ± 0.18, indicating there are more functioning hepatocytes and less fibrosis in GBFN than in BGL. The GBFN grades were significantly correlated to relative signal intensity at HBP (Spearman's rank correlation, <i>p</i> < 0.01, rho value 0.53), and ECV ratio (<i>p</i> < 0.01, rho value -0.45). Our results suggest GBFN in ALD would represent liver tissues with preserved liver function with less fibrosis, as compared to BGL, which are considered to support our hypothesis as shown above.</p>","PeriodicalId":12556,"journal":{"name":"Global health & medicine","volume":"6 3","pages":"183-189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11197160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health & medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35772/ghm.2023.01085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to further verify the concept utilizing signal intensity on hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of gadoxetate-enhanced MRI and extracellular volume fraction (ECV) calculated from CT data. Between Jan 2013 and September 2018, consecutive ALD patients who had both quadruple phase CT and gadoxetate-enhanced MRI within six months were retrospectively recruited. Those who had any intervention or disease involvement around gallbladder fossa were excluded. All images were reviewed and ECV was measured by two experienced radiologists. GBFN grades, and their HBP signal intensity or ECV relative to the surrounding background liver (BGL) were analyzed. There were 48 patients who met the inclusion criteria. There were GBFN grade 0/1/2/3 in 11/15/18/4 patients, respectively. The signal intensity on HBP relative to BGL were iso/slightly high/high in 30/15/3 patients, respectively, and ECV ratio (ECV of GBFN divided by that of BGL) was 0.88 ± 0.18, indicating there are more functioning hepatocytes and less fibrosis in GBFN than in BGL. The GBFN grades were significantly correlated to relative signal intensity at HBP (Spearman's rank correlation, p < 0.01, rho value 0.53), and ECV ratio (p < 0.01, rho value -0.45). Our results suggest GBFN in ALD would represent liver tissues with preserved liver function with less fibrosis, as compared to BGL, which are considered to support our hypothesis as shown above.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
酒精性肝病患者肝脏中的胆囊窝结节:根据钆喷酸增强核磁共振成像的肝胆相信号强度和常规 CT 数据计算的细胞外体积分数进行分析。
本研究旨在进一步验证利用钆塞酸增强 MRI 的肝胆相(HBP)信号强度和 CT 数据计算的细胞外体积分数(ECV)的概念。2013年1月至2018年9月期间,回顾性招募了6个月内同时接受过四重相CT和钆塞酸增强MRI检查的连续ALD患者。排除了胆囊窝周围有任何干预或疾病受累的患者。由两名经验丰富的放射科医生对所有图像进行复查并测量ECV。分析GBFN分级及其相对于周围背景肝脏(BGL)的HBP信号强度或ECV。共有 48 名患者符合纳入标准。11/15/18/4例患者的GBFN等级分别为0/1/2/3。30/15/3例患者的HBP信号强度相对于BGL信号强度分别为等高/略高/高,ECV比值(GBFN的ECV除以BGL的ECV)为0.88 ± 0.18,表明GBFN中的功能肝细胞比BGL中的功能肝细胞多,纤维化程度低。GBFN 分级与 HBP 的相对信号强度(Spearman秩相关,P < 0.01,rho 值 0.53)和 ECV 比值(P < 0.01,rho 值 -0.45)显著相关。我们的研究结果表明,与 BGL 相比,ALD 中的 GBFN 代表肝功能保留且纤维化较少的肝组织,这被认为支持了我们的上述假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advances in HIV management and challenges in Japan: Current situation of pre-exposure prophylaxis in Tokyo. Analysis of tumor infiltrating immune cells in Kaposi sarcoma lesions discovers shifts in macrophage populations. Changes in epidemiological and treatment-related characteristics among newly reported HIV/AIDS cases in an urban area in Shanghai, China from 2001 to 2019: A population-based retrospective study. Exploration of PrEP/PEP service delivery model in China: A pilot in eastern, central and western region. Identification of new circulating recombinant form of HIV-1 CRF139_02B in Japan, and search for the origin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1