The effects of field strength on stimulated echo and motion-compensated spin-echo diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance sequences.

Abstract

Background: In-vivo diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DT-CMR) is an emerging technique for microstructural tissue characterization in the myocardium. Most studies are performed at 3T, where higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) should benefit this signal-starved method. However, a few studies have suggested that DT-CMR is possible at 1.5T, where echo planar imaging artifacts may be less severe and 1.5T hardware is more widely available.

Methods: We recruited 20 healthy volunteers and performed mid-ventricular short-axis DT-CMR at 1.5T and 3T. Acquisitions were performed at peak systole and end-diastole using both stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM) and motion-compensated spin-echo (MCSE) sequences at matched spatial resolutions. DT-CMR parameters were averaged over the left ventricle and compared between 1.5T and 3T sequences using both datasets with and without the b_low reference data included.

Results: Eleven (1.5T) and 12 (3T) diastolic MCSE acquisitions were rejected as the helix angle (HA) demonstrated <50% normal appearance circumferentially or the acquisition was abandoned due to poor image quality; a maximum of one acquisition was rejected for other datasets. Subjective HA map quality was significantly better at 3T than 1.5T for STEAM (p < 0.05), but not for MCSE and other DT-CMR quality measures were consistent with improvements in STEAM at 3T over 1.5T. When b_low data were excluded, no significant differences in mean diffusivity were observed between field strengths, but fractional anisotropy was significantly higher at 1.5T than 3T for STEAM systole (p < 0.05). Absolute second eigenvector orientation (E2A, sheetlet angle) was significantly higher at 1.5T than 3T for MCSE systole and STEAM diastole, but significantly lower for STEAM systole (all p < 0.05). Transmural HA distribution was less steep at 1.5T than 3T for STEAM diastole data (p < 0.05). SNR was higher at 3T than 1.5T for all acquisitions (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: While 3T provides benefits in terms of SNR, both STEAM and MCSE can be performed at 1.5T. However, MCSE is unreliable in diastole at both field strengths and STEAM benefits from the improved SNR at 3T over 1.5T. Future clinical research studies may be able to leverage the wider availability of 1.5T CMR hardware where MCSE acquisitions are desirable.