Molecular Expression Assays Improve the Prediction of Local and Invasive Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1200/JCO.23.02276
Ezra Hahn, Rinku Sutradhar, Lawrence Paszat, Lena Nguyen, Danielle Rodin, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sabina Trebinjac, Katarzyna J Jerzak, Cindy Fong, Eileen Rakovitch
{"title":"Molecular Expression Assays Improve the Prediction of Local and Invasive Local Recurrence After Breast-Conserving Surgery for Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.","authors":"Ezra Hahn, Rinku Sutradhar, Lawrence Paszat, Lena Nguyen, Danielle Rodin, Sharon Nofech-Mozes, Sabina Trebinjac, Katarzyna J Jerzak, Cindy Fong, Eileen Rakovitch","doi":"10.1200/JCO.23.02276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The inability to accurately estimate an individual's risk of local recurrence (LR) and invasive LR using clinicopathologic factors (CPF) contributes to the overtreatment of DCIS. We examined the impact of the 12-gene DCIS Score (DS) and the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) on the accuracy of predicting LR and invasive LR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based cohort diagnosed with pure DCIS treated with BCS ± RT from 1994 to 2003 was used. All patients had expert pathology review and assessment of the DS and RS. Predictive models (CPF alone, DS + CPF, and RS + CPF) were developed using multivariable Cox regression analyses to predict 10-year LR and invasive LR risks. Models were evaluated on the basis of c-statistic, -2log likelihood estimate (-2LLE), and Akaike information criterion. Calibration was performed using bootstrap resamples, with replacement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort includes 1,226 women treated with BCS; 712 received RT. 194 women (15.8%) experienced ipsilateral LR as a first event; 112 were invasive. Models including the DS or RS performed better in predicting the 10-year risk of LR compared with models on the basis of CPF alone with excellent calibration. The two molecular-based models also performed better in predicting invasive LR compared with the CPF model but the model incorporating the RS did not perform better in the prediction of invasive LR compared with the DS-based model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Models incorporating the DS or RS more accurately predicted the 10-year risk of LR and invasive LR after BCS compared with models on the basis of CPF alone. Inclusion of the RS, compared with DS, did not improve the prediction of the 10-year risk of invasive LR.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.02276","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is routinely treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The inability to accurately estimate an individual's risk of local recurrence (LR) and invasive LR using clinicopathologic factors (CPF) contributes to the overtreatment of DCIS. We examined the impact of the 12-gene DCIS Score (DS) and the 21-gene Recurrence Score (RS) on the accuracy of predicting LR and invasive LR.

Methods: A population-based cohort diagnosed with pure DCIS treated with BCS ± RT from 1994 to 2003 was used. All patients had expert pathology review and assessment of the DS and RS. Predictive models (CPF alone, DS + CPF, and RS + CPF) were developed using multivariable Cox regression analyses to predict 10-year LR and invasive LR risks. Models were evaluated on the basis of c-statistic, -2log likelihood estimate (-2LLE), and Akaike information criterion. Calibration was performed using bootstrap resamples, with replacement.

Results: The cohort includes 1,226 women treated with BCS; 712 received RT. 194 women (15.8%) experienced ipsilateral LR as a first event; 112 were invasive. Models including the DS or RS performed better in predicting the 10-year risk of LR compared with models on the basis of CPF alone with excellent calibration. The two molecular-based models also performed better in predicting invasive LR compared with the CPF model but the model incorporating the RS did not perform better in the prediction of invasive LR compared with the DS-based model.

Conclusion: Models incorporating the DS or RS more accurately predicted the 10-year risk of LR and invasive LR after BCS compared with models on the basis of CPF alone. Inclusion of the RS, compared with DS, did not improve the prediction of the 10-year risk of invasive LR.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分子表达测定可提高原位乳管癌保乳手术后局部和侵袭性局部复发的预测能力
目的:保乳手术(BCS)后,乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)常规采用辅助放疗(RT)治疗。由于无法使用临床病理因素(CPF)准确估计个体的局部复发(LR)和浸润性LR风险,导致了DCIS的过度治疗。我们研究了12基因DCIS评分(DS)和21基因复发评分(RS)对预测LR和侵袭性LR准确性的影响:方法:采用 1994 年至 2003 年期间诊断为纯 DCIS 并接受 BCS±RT 治疗的人群队列。所有患者均接受了专家病理审查和 DS 与 RS 评估。使用多变量 Cox 回归分析建立了预测模型(CPF 单项、DS + CPF 和 RS + CPF),以预测 10 年 LR 和侵袭性 LR 风险。根据 c 统计量、-2log 似然估计值 (-2LLE) 和 Akaike 信息标准对模型进行评估。校准采用带替换的引导重采样法进行:队列中有 1,226 名妇女接受了 BCS 治疗;712 名接受了 RT 治疗。194名女性(15.8%)首次出现同侧LR,其中112名为侵袭性LR。与仅基于CPF的模型相比,包括DS或RS的模型在预测10年LR风险方面表现更好,校准效果极佳。与 CPF 模型相比,两种基于分子的模型在预测侵袭性 LR 方面也表现更佳,但与基于 DS 的模型相比,包含 RS 的模型在预测侵袭性 LR 方面表现不佳:结论:与仅基于 CPF 的模型相比,包含 DS 或 RS 的模型能更准确地预测 BCS 后 10 年的 LR 和浸润性 LR 风险。与DS相比,纳入RS并不能改善对侵袭性LR 10年风险的预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Adjuvant Nivolumab for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma at High Risk of Recurrence After Nephrectomy: Part B of the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III CheckMate 914 Trial. Navigating Hormone Therapy in Postmenopausal Women: Balancing Symptom Relief With Cancer Risk. Radiotherapy Versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Final Results of the ORATOR Randomized Trial. Methodological Considerations for Ensuring Robustness in Exercise and Breast Cancer Recurrence Studies. PEARL: A Phase Ib/II Biomarker Study of Adding Radiation Therapy to Pembrolizumab Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1