Unmet need for primary health care and subsequent inpatient hospitalisation in Aotearoa New Zealand. A cohort study.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of primary health care Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1071/HC24018
Megan Pledger, Jacqueline Cumming
{"title":"Unmet need for primary health care and subsequent inpatient hospitalisation in Aotearoa New Zealand. A cohort study.","authors":"Megan Pledger, Jacqueline Cumming","doi":"10.1071/HC24018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The inability to afford a consultation with a general practitioner may lead to delays in accessing care pathways. Aim This study aimed to explore the characteristics of people by their unmet need for a general practitioner consultation because of cost, and the characteristics of subsequent inpatient hospitalisations. Methods From the New Zealand Health Surveys (2013/14-2018/19), two groups were formed based on their unmet need for a general practitioner consultation due to cost. These groups were compared by socio-demographic factors and subsequent inpatient hospitalisation characteristics during follow-up. Time to an inpatient hospitalisation was the outcome in a proportional hazards regression model with need status as the key variable. The model was expanded to include confounding variables: sex, age group, ethnicity, the New Zealand Deprivation Index and self-rated health. Results The need group, characterised by having a higher proportion of females, younger adults, Māori, increased socioeconomic deprivation and poorer self-rated health experienced a greater chance of hospitalisation, a similar number of visits during follow-up, shorter stays and a quicker time to hospitalisation compared to the no-need group. Proportional hazards survival models gave a 28% higher hazard rate for the time to an inpatient hospitalisation for the need group compared to the no-need group. The inclusion of all the confounders in the model gave a similar hazard ratio. Discussion Although consultation fees vary across general practices, it is evident that this may not eliminate the cost barriers to accessing care for some groups. Needing multiple consultations may contribute to persistent unmet needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"16 2","pages":"128-134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC24018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The inability to afford a consultation with a general practitioner may lead to delays in accessing care pathways. Aim This study aimed to explore the characteristics of people by their unmet need for a general practitioner consultation because of cost, and the characteristics of subsequent inpatient hospitalisations. Methods From the New Zealand Health Surveys (2013/14-2018/19), two groups were formed based on their unmet need for a general practitioner consultation due to cost. These groups were compared by socio-demographic factors and subsequent inpatient hospitalisation characteristics during follow-up. Time to an inpatient hospitalisation was the outcome in a proportional hazards regression model with need status as the key variable. The model was expanded to include confounding variables: sex, age group, ethnicity, the New Zealand Deprivation Index and self-rated health. Results The need group, characterised by having a higher proportion of females, younger adults, Māori, increased socioeconomic deprivation and poorer self-rated health experienced a greater chance of hospitalisation, a similar number of visits during follow-up, shorter stays and a quicker time to hospitalisation compared to the no-need group. Proportional hazards survival models gave a 28% higher hazard rate for the time to an inpatient hospitalisation for the need group compared to the no-need group. The inclusion of all the confounders in the model gave a similar hazard ratio. Discussion Although consultation fees vary across general practices, it is evident that this may not eliminate the cost barriers to accessing care for some groups. Needing multiple consultations may contribute to persistent unmet needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰奥特亚罗瓦地区未得到满足的初级保健需求与随后的住院治疗。一项队列研究。
引言 无力负担全科医生的诊疗费用可能会导致延误就医。目的 本研究旨在探讨因费用问题而无法满足全科医生咨询需求的人群特征,以及随后住院治疗的特征。方法 根据新西兰健康调查(2013/14-2018/19),按照因费用问题而未满足全科医生咨询需求的人群划分为两组。在随访过程中,根据社会人口因素和随后的住院病人特征对这两组进行比较。住院时间是以需求状况为关键变量的比例危险回归模型的结果。该模型扩展了混杂变量:性别、年龄组、种族、新西兰贫困指数和自评健康状况。结果 与无需求组相比,有需求组的女性、年轻成年人、毛利人比例更高,社会经济贫困程度更高,自评健康状况更差,因此住院几率更高,随访期间就诊次数相似,住院时间更短,住院时间更快。比例危险生存模型显示,与无需求组相比,有需求组的住院时间危险率高出 28%。将所有混杂因素纳入模型后,危险比相似。讨论 尽管普通诊所的诊费各不相同,但很明显,这并不能消除某些群体获得医疗服务的成本障碍。需要多次就诊可能会导致需求长期得不到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
A supported primary health pathway for mild traumatic brain injury quality improvement report. Can SSRI's help women suffering with PMS? Checklists for assessing ethical aspects of health technologies and services. Comfort with having sexual orientation recorded on official databases among a community and online sample of gay and bisexual men in Aotearoa New Zealand. Ethical assessment of virtual consultation services: application of a practical ethical checklist to direct-to-consumer services in Aotearoa New Zealand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1