A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes of Pedicled Flap Repairs of the Knee Extensor Mechanism.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of reconstructive microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1055/a-2355-4073
Nayun Lee, Marlie H Fisher, Colin T McNamara, Mark A Greyson, Craig A Hogan, Matthew L Iorio
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Clinical Outcomes of Pedicled Flap Repairs of the Knee Extensor Mechanism.","authors":"Nayun Lee, Marlie H Fisher, Colin T McNamara, Mark A Greyson, Craig A Hogan, Matthew L Iorio","doi":"10.1055/a-2355-4073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Rupture of the extensor mechanism of the knee has severe functional morbidity, and repair can be complicated by infection, allograft degeneration, and recurrent rupture. Techniques of autologous tissue repair utilizing pedicled flaps such as the gastrocnemius offer vascularized methods of reconstruction, with potentially diminished complication rates. The goal of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications associated with pedicled flap repair of the knee extensor mechanism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Publications that focused on local myocutaneous flaps as a means for reconstruction were included. Causes for knee extensor mechanism deficit, flap characteristics, ambulation rate, changes in range of motion pre- and postoperation, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Technique reports including primary suture repairs, synthetic mesh, and allograft use were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> An initial 119 studies were identified, with final review of 22 observational studies encompassing 128 cases of pedicled flap reconstructions. The gastrocnemius (88.2%, <i>n</i> = 113), quadriceps (6.3%, <i>n</i> = 8), and a combination of the vastus and gastrocnemius flaps (5.5%, <i>n</i> = 7), were the most frequently utilized flaps. Functional outcomes were favorable with 87.2% of patients achieving ambulation without external support. Variability in range of motion outcomes across different flap may be secondary to the patient characteristics as well as extent of initial injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Autologous pedicle flap reconstruction of the knee extensor mechanism emerges as a viable option for cases characterized by extensive defects and insufficient soft tissue coverage, which are not amenable to direct suture repairs or allografts. Postoperative assessments revealed that the majority of patients experienced improved ambulation status, with no instances of deterioration noted among the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2355-4073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Rupture of the extensor mechanism of the knee has severe functional morbidity, and repair can be complicated by infection, allograft degeneration, and recurrent rupture. Techniques of autologous tissue repair utilizing pedicled flaps such as the gastrocnemius offer vascularized methods of reconstruction, with potentially diminished complication rates. The goal of this study was to evaluate the functional outcomes and complications associated with pedicled flap repair of the knee extensor mechanism.

Methods:  A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Publications that focused on local myocutaneous flaps as a means for reconstruction were included. Causes for knee extensor mechanism deficit, flap characteristics, ambulation rate, changes in range of motion pre- and postoperation, and postoperative complications were analyzed. Technique reports including primary suture repairs, synthetic mesh, and allograft use were excluded.

Results:  An initial 119 studies were identified, with final review of 22 observational studies encompassing 128 cases of pedicled flap reconstructions. The gastrocnemius (88.2%, n = 113), quadriceps (6.3%, n = 8), and a combination of the vastus and gastrocnemius flaps (5.5%, n = 7), were the most frequently utilized flaps. Functional outcomes were favorable with 87.2% of patients achieving ambulation without external support. Variability in range of motion outcomes across different flap may be secondary to the patient characteristics as well as extent of initial injury.

Conclusions:  Autologous pedicle flap reconstruction of the knee extensor mechanism emerges as a viable option for cases characterized by extensive defects and insufficient soft tissue coverage, which are not amenable to direct suture repairs or allografts. Postoperative assessments revealed that the majority of patients experienced improved ambulation status, with no instances of deterioration noted among the patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膝关节伸肌机制带蒂皮瓣修复术临床效果的系统性回顾。
背景膝关节伸肌机制断裂会导致严重的功能性发病,感染、异体移植物变性和复发性断裂会使修复变得复杂。利用腓肠肌等带蒂皮瓣进行自体组织修复的技术提供了血管化的重建方法,有可能降低并发症发生率。本研究旨在评估膝关节伸肌机制带蒂皮瓣修复术的功能效果和相关并发症。方法 按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性回顾。纳入了以局部肌皮瓣作为重建手段的文献。分析了膝关节伸肌机构缺损的原因、皮瓣特征、行走率、手术前后活动范围的变化以及术后并发症。包括初次缝合修复、合成网片和异体移植物使用在内的技术报告均被排除在外。结果 最初确定了 119 项研究,最后审查了 22 项观察性研究,其中包括 128 例足皮瓣重建术。腓肠肌(88.2%,n=113)、股四头肌(6.3%,n=8)以及阔筋膜瓣和腓肠肌瓣的组合(5.5%,n=7)是最常用的皮瓣。功能结果良好,87.2%的患者无需外部支持即可下地活动。不同皮瓣的活动范围结果存在差异,这可能与患者的特征和初始损伤程度有关。结论 自体椎弓根皮瓣重建膝关节伸肌机制是一种可行的方法,适用于缺损范围广、软组织覆盖不足、无法直接缝合修复或异体移植的病例。术后评估显示,大多数患者的行走状况都有所改善,没有发现病情恶化的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
期刊最新文献
Flap-Based Reconstruction in Patients with Autoimmune Disease: An Institutional Experience with the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Review of the Literature. Free Latissimus Dorsi Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction at a Modern High-Volume Microsurgery Center. Trends in Hospital Billing for Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Procedures from 2013 to 2020. Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery-vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Computed Tomography Anatomical Study. DIEP Donor Site Satisfaction between Patients with and without History of Pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1