Prescription Medication Use in Pregnancy in People with Disabilities: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2023.1138
Andi Camden, Sonia M Grandi, Yona Lunsky, Joel G Ray, Isobel Sharpe, Hong Lu, Astrid Guttmann, Lauren Tailor, Simone Vigod, Mary A De Vera, Hilary K Brown
{"title":"Prescription Medication Use in Pregnancy in People with Disabilities: A Population-Based Cohort Study.","authors":"Andi Camden, Sonia M Grandi, Yona Lunsky, Joel G Ray, Isobel Sharpe, Hong Lu, Astrid Guttmann, Lauren Tailor, Simone Vigod, Mary A De Vera, Hilary K Brown","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2023.1138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Individuals with disabilities may require specific medications in pregnancy. The prevalence and patterns of medication use, overall and for medications with known teratogenic risks, are largely unknown. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, 2004-2021, comprised all recognized pregnancies among individuals eligible for public drug plan coverage. Included were those with a physical (<i>n</i> = 44,136), sensory (<i>n</i> = 13,633), intellectual or developmental (<i>n</i> = 2,446) disability, or multiple disabilities (<i>n</i> = 5,064), compared with those without a disability (<i>n</i> = 299,944). Prescription medication use in pregnancy, overall and by type, was described. Modified Poisson regression generated relative risks (aRR) for the use of medications with known teratogenic risks and use of ≥2 and ≥5 medications concurrently in pregnancy, comparing those with versus without a disability, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Medication use in pregnancy was more common in people with intellectual or developmental (82.1%), multiple (80.4%), physical (73.9%), and sensory (71.9%) disabilities, than in those with no known disability (67.4%). Compared with those without a disability (5.7%), teratogenic medication use in pregnancy was especially higher in people with multiple disabilities (14.2%; aRR 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.88-2.20). Furthermore, compared with people without a disability (3.2%), the use of ≥5 medications concurrently was more common in those with multiple disabilities (13.4%; aRR 2.21, 95% CI: 2.02-2.41) and an intellectual or developmental disability (9.3%; aRR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.86-2.45). <b><i>Interpretation:</i></b> Among people with disabilities, medication use in pregnancy is prevalent, especially for potentially teratogenic medications and polypharmacy, highlighting the need for preconception counseling/monitoring to reduce medication-related harm in pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"1224-1232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.1138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with disabilities may require specific medications in pregnancy. The prevalence and patterns of medication use, overall and for medications with known teratogenic risks, are largely unknown. Methods: This population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, 2004-2021, comprised all recognized pregnancies among individuals eligible for public drug plan coverage. Included were those with a physical (n = 44,136), sensory (n = 13,633), intellectual or developmental (n = 2,446) disability, or multiple disabilities (n = 5,064), compared with those without a disability (n = 299,944). Prescription medication use in pregnancy, overall and by type, was described. Modified Poisson regression generated relative risks (aRR) for the use of medications with known teratogenic risks and use of ≥2 and ≥5 medications concurrently in pregnancy, comparing those with versus without a disability, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Results: Medication use in pregnancy was more common in people with intellectual or developmental (82.1%), multiple (80.4%), physical (73.9%), and sensory (71.9%) disabilities, than in those with no known disability (67.4%). Compared with those without a disability (5.7%), teratogenic medication use in pregnancy was especially higher in people with multiple disabilities (14.2%; aRR 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.88-2.20). Furthermore, compared with people without a disability (3.2%), the use of ≥5 medications concurrently was more common in those with multiple disabilities (13.4%; aRR 2.21, 95% CI: 2.02-2.41) and an intellectual or developmental disability (9.3%; aRR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.86-2.45). Interpretation: Among people with disabilities, medication use in pregnancy is prevalent, especially for potentially teratogenic medications and polypharmacy, highlighting the need for preconception counseling/monitoring to reduce medication-related harm in pregnancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
残疾人妊娠期处方药使用情况:基于人群的队列研究。
背景:残疾人士在怀孕期间可能需要服用特定药物。目前尚不清楚总体用药情况以及已知有致畸风险的药物的使用情况和模式。研究方法这项以人口为基础的队列研究于 2004-2021 年在加拿大安大略省进行,研究对象包括符合公共药物计划覆盖条件的所有公认妊娠。研究对象包括有肢体残疾(44136 人)、感官残疾(13633 人)、智力或发育残疾(2446 人)或多重残疾(5064 人)的孕妇,以及无残疾的孕妇(299944 人)。对妊娠期处方药使用情况进行了总体和分类描述。在对社会人口学和临床因素进行调整后,对有残疾和无残疾的孕妇进行了比较,并对已知有致畸风险的药物的使用情况以及孕期同时使用≥2种和≥5种药物的情况进行了修正泊松回归,得出了相对风险系数(aRR)。结果显示有智力或发育障碍(82.1%)、多重残疾(80.4%)、肢体残疾(73.9%)和感官残疾(71.9%)的人在怀孕期间使用药物的比例高于无残疾的人(67.4%)。与无残疾者(5.7%)相比,多重残疾者在孕期使用致畸药物的比例尤其高(14.2%;aRR 2.03,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.88-2.20)。此外,与无残疾者(3.2%)相比,同时使用≥5 种药物在多重残疾者(13.4%;aRR 2.21,95% 置信区间 [CI]:2.02-2.41)和智力或发育残疾者(9.3%;aRR 2.13,95% 置信区间 [CI]:1.86-2.45)中更为常见。解释:在残障人士中,妊娠期用药非常普遍,尤其是可能致畸的药物和多重用药,这凸显了孕前咨询/监测以减少妊娠期用药相关伤害的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
期刊最新文献
Attitudes and Experiences Regarding Communication About Maternal Vaccination: Qualitative Findings from Non-Hispanic Black Pregnant People. Oncofertility Research: A Review of the Literature. Self-Management Interventions for Black Women at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Literature Review. Gender Differences in "Making Weight" Behaviors Among U.S. Iraq and Afghan War Veterans: Implications for Future Health. Maternal Postpartum Readmission for Hypertension-Quality Metric or Call for Action?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1