Bioinformatics and machine learning to support nanomaterial grouping.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q3 NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY Nanotoxicology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1080/17435390.2024.2368005
Aileen Bahl, Sabina Halappanavar, Wendel Wohlleben, Penny Nymark, Pekka Kohonen, Håkan Wallin, Ulla Vogel, Andrea Haase
{"title":"Bioinformatics and machine learning to support nanomaterial grouping.","authors":"Aileen Bahl, Sabina Halappanavar, Wendel Wohlleben, Penny Nymark, Pekka Kohonen, Håkan Wallin, Ulla Vogel, Andrea Haase","doi":"10.1080/17435390.2024.2368005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nanomaterials (NMs) offer plenty of novel functionalities. Moreover, their physicochemical properties can be fine-tuned to meet the needs of specific applications, leading to virtually unlimited numbers of NM variants. Hence, efficient hazard and risk assessment strategies building on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) become indispensable. Indeed, the design, the development and implementation of NAMs has been a major topic in a substantial number of research projects. One of the promising strategies that can help to deal with the high number of NMs variants is grouping and read-across. Based on demonstrated structural and physicochemical similarity, NMs can be grouped and assessed together. Within an established NM group, read-across may be performed to fill in data gaps for data-poor variants using existing data for NMs within the group. Establishing a group requires a sound justification, usually based on a grouping hypothesis that links specific physicochemical properties to well-defined hazard endpoints. However, for NMs these interrelationships are only beginning to be understood. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the power of bioinformatics with a specific focus on Machine Learning (ML) approaches to unravel the NM Modes-of-Action (MoA) and identify the properties that are relevant to specific hazards, in support of grouping strategies. This review emphasizes the following messages: 1) ML supports identification of the most relevant properties contributing to specific hazards; 2) ML supports analysis of large omics datasets and identification of MoA patterns in support of hypothesis formulation in grouping approaches; 3) omics approaches are useful for shifting away from consideration of single endpoints towards a more mechanistic understanding across multiple endpoints gained from one experiment; and 4) approaches from other fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI) like Natural Language Processing or image analysis may support automated extraction and interlinkage of information related to NM toxicity. Here, existing ML models for predicting NM toxicity and for analyzing omics data in support of NM grouping are reviewed. Various challenges related to building robust models in the field of nanotoxicology exist and are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18899,"journal":{"name":"Nanotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":"373-400"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nanotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2024.2368005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NANOSCIENCE & NANOTECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nanomaterials (NMs) offer plenty of novel functionalities. Moreover, their physicochemical properties can be fine-tuned to meet the needs of specific applications, leading to virtually unlimited numbers of NM variants. Hence, efficient hazard and risk assessment strategies building on New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) become indispensable. Indeed, the design, the development and implementation of NAMs has been a major topic in a substantial number of research projects. One of the promising strategies that can help to deal with the high number of NMs variants is grouping and read-across. Based on demonstrated structural and physicochemical similarity, NMs can be grouped and assessed together. Within an established NM group, read-across may be performed to fill in data gaps for data-poor variants using existing data for NMs within the group. Establishing a group requires a sound justification, usually based on a grouping hypothesis that links specific physicochemical properties to well-defined hazard endpoints. However, for NMs these interrelationships are only beginning to be understood. The aim of this review is to demonstrate the power of bioinformatics with a specific focus on Machine Learning (ML) approaches to unravel the NM Modes-of-Action (MoA) and identify the properties that are relevant to specific hazards, in support of grouping strategies. This review emphasizes the following messages: 1) ML supports identification of the most relevant properties contributing to specific hazards; 2) ML supports analysis of large omics datasets and identification of MoA patterns in support of hypothesis formulation in grouping approaches; 3) omics approaches are useful for shifting away from consideration of single endpoints towards a more mechanistic understanding across multiple endpoints gained from one experiment; and 4) approaches from other fields of Artificial Intelligence (AI) like Natural Language Processing or image analysis may support automated extraction and interlinkage of information related to NM toxicity. Here, existing ML models for predicting NM toxicity and for analyzing omics data in support of NM grouping are reviewed. Various challenges related to building robust models in the field of nanotoxicology exist and are also discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生物信息学和机器学习支持纳米材料分组。
纳米材料(NMs)具有多种新功能。此外,纳米材料的物理化学特性可以进行微调,以满足特定应用的需要,从而产生几乎无限数量的纳米材料变体。因此,基于新方法(NAM)的高效危害和风险评估策略变得不可或缺。事实上,新方法的设计、开发和实施一直是大量研究项目的主要课题。有助于处理大量 NMs 变体的可行策略之一是分组和交叉阅读。根据已证明的结构和理化相似性,可对非转基因生物进行分组和评估。在已建立的非转基因组内,可利用组内非转基因的现有数据进行交叉阅读,以填补数据贫乏变体的数据缺口。建立组别需要合理的理由,通常是基于将特定理化特性与明确界定的危害终点联系起来的分组假设。然而,人们对非金属的这些相互关系才刚刚开始了解。本综述旨在展示生物信息学的威力,特别侧重于机器学习 (ML) 方法,以揭示非转基因物质的作用模式 (MoA),并确定与特定危害相关的特性,从而为分组策略提供支持。本综述强调以下信息:1)ML 支持识别导致特定危害的最相关特性;2)ML 支持分析大型全量组学数据集和识别 MoA 模式,以支持分组方法中的假设;3)全量组学方法有助于从考虑单一终点转向从一次实验中获得的对多个终点的更机理的理解;以及 4)来自其他人工智能(AI)领域(如自然语言处理或图像分析)的方法可支持与 NM 毒性有关的信息的自动提取和相互关联。在此,我们回顾了现有的用于预测核材料毒性和分析 omics 数据以支持核材料分组的 ML 模型。此外,还讨论了在纳米毒理学领域建立强大模型所面临的各种挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nanotoxicology
Nanotoxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Nanotoxicology invites contributions addressing research relating to the potential for human and environmental exposure, hazard and risk associated with the use and development of nano-structured materials. In this context, the term nano-structured materials has a broad definition, including ‘materials with at least one dimension in the nanometer size range’. These nanomaterials range from nanoparticles and nanomedicines, to nano-surfaces of larger materials and composite materials. The range of nanomaterials in use and under development is extremely diverse, so this journal includes a range of materials generated for purposeful delivery into the body (food, medicines, diagnostics and prosthetics), to consumer products (e.g. paints, cosmetics, electronics and clothing), and particles designed for environmental applications (e.g. remediation). It is the nano-size range if these materials which unifies them and defines the scope of Nanotoxicology . While the term ‘toxicology’ indicates risk, the journal Nanotoxicology also aims to encompass studies that enhance safety during the production, use and disposal of nanomaterials. Well-controlled studies demonstrating a lack of exposure, hazard or risk associated with nanomaterials, or studies aiming to improve biocompatibility are welcomed and encouraged, as such studies will lead to an advancement of nanotechnology. Furthermore, many nanoparticles are developed with the intention to improve human health (e.g. antimicrobial agents), and again, such articles are encouraged. In order to promote quality, Nanotoxicology will prioritise publications that have demonstrated characterisation of the nanomaterials investigated.
期刊最新文献
Investigation of potential cytotoxicity of a water-soluble, red-fluorescent [70]fullerene nanomaterial in Drosophila melanogaster. Modulating exosomal communication between macrophages and melanoma cancer cells via cyclodextrin-based nanosponges loaded with doxorubicin. In vivo assessment of topically applied silver nanoparticles on entire cornea: comprehensive FTIR study. Environmental toxicity assessment of engineered nanoparticles manifest histo-hemato alterations to fresh water fish. Biokinetics of carbon black, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, cerium oxide, silica, and titanium dioxide nanoparticles after inhalation: a review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1