Prevalence of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in children with type 1 myotonic dystrophy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1002/mus.28188
Omar Meziab, Michael D Seckeler, Katalin Scherer, Brent J Barber
{"title":"Prevalence of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in children with type 1 myotonic dystrophy.","authors":"Omar Meziab, Michael D Seckeler, Katalin Scherer, Brent J Barber","doi":"10.1002/mus.28188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1) is a neuromuscular disorder of multiple organ systems with important electrophysiologic (EP) manifestations, leading to a cumulative incidence of sudden death of 6.6%. Due to genetic anticipation, there is a pediatric subset of this patient population. However, most EP research on DM1 patients has been in adults, making cardiac care for pediatric patients difficult and directed by adult guidelines which often leads to cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implants. We sought to investigate the prevalence of CIEDs in the pediatric DM1 population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Vizient® Clinical Data Base was queried from October 2019 to October 2023 for admissions with and without ICD-10 code for myotonic dystrophy (G71.11), with and without codes for presence of a pacemaker or ICD (Z95.0, Z95.810). Patients who were identified were stratified by age: Pediatric (0-21 years) and Adult (22-50 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prevalence of CIED in pediatric DM1 was 2.1% and in adult DM1 was 15.8%. When comparing to pediatric and adult patients with CIED and without DM1, the odds ratio for CIED in pediatric DM1 was 48.8, compared to 23.3 for CIED in adult DM1.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>There are pediatric DM1 patients who have received CIED despite a lack of data to inform this decision-making. Further research will be important to ensure appropriate use of CIED in this population and to develop appropriate guidelines to direct management.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Type 1 myotonic dystrophy (DM1) is a neuromuscular disorder of multiple organ systems with important electrophysiologic (EP) manifestations, leading to a cumulative incidence of sudden death of 6.6%. Due to genetic anticipation, there is a pediatric subset of this patient population. However, most EP research on DM1 patients has been in adults, making cardiac care for pediatric patients difficult and directed by adult guidelines which often leads to cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) implants. We sought to investigate the prevalence of CIEDs in the pediatric DM1 population.

Methods: The Vizient® Clinical Data Base was queried from October 2019 to October 2023 for admissions with and without ICD-10 code for myotonic dystrophy (G71.11), with and without codes for presence of a pacemaker or ICD (Z95.0, Z95.810). Patients who were identified were stratified by age: Pediatric (0-21 years) and Adult (22-50 years).

Results: Prevalence of CIED in pediatric DM1 was 2.1% and in adult DM1 was 15.8%. When comparing to pediatric and adult patients with CIED and without DM1, the odds ratio for CIED in pediatric DM1 was 48.8, compared to 23.3 for CIED in adult DM1.

Discussion: There are pediatric DM1 patients who have received CIED despite a lack of data to inform this decision-making. Further research will be important to ensure appropriate use of CIED in this population and to develop appropriate guidelines to direct management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1型肌张力营养不良症患儿心血管植入式电子装置的患病率。
导言/目的:1型肌营养不良症(DM1)是一种涉及多个器官系统的神经肌肉疾病,具有重要的电生理学(EP)表现,导致猝死的累计发生率为6.6%。由于遗传因素的影响,这种疾病的患者群体中有一个儿科亚群。然而,大多数针对 DM1 患者的 EP 研究都是针对成人的,这就给儿科患者的心脏护理带来了困难,而且成人指南的指导往往会导致心血管植入式电子设备(CIED)的植入。我们试图调查CIED在儿科DM1人群中的发病率:从 2019 年 10 月到 2023 年 10 月,我们查询了 Vizient® 临床数据库中带有或不带有肌营养不良症(G71.11)ICD-10 代码、带有或不带有起搏器或 ICD(Z95.0、Z95.810)代码的入院患者。已确定的患者按年龄分层:结果:结果:CIED在儿科DM1患者中的发病率为2.1%,在成人DM1患者中的发病率为15.8%。与有CIED和无DM1的儿科和成人患者相比,儿科DM1患者CIED的几率比为48.8,而成人DM1患者CIED的几率比为23.3:讨论:尽管缺乏相关数据,但仍有小儿DM1患者接受了CIED治疗。进一步的研究对于确保在这一人群中适当使用CIED以及制定指导管理的适当指南非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
期刊最新文献
Anatomical validation of needle placement for cervical paraspinal mapping of the multifidus. Development of an ultrasound-based metric of muscle functional capacity for use in patients with neuromuscular disease. Intravenous immunoglobulin and plasma exchange prescribing patterns for Guillain-Barre Syndrome in the United States-2001 to 2018. Phrenic neuropathy: A different flavor of the same dish. The use of electrical stimulation to enhance recovery following peripheral nerve injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1