Effects of ondansetron on symptoms during a gastric emptying study and enteral lipid challenge and on daily symptoms in diabetic gastroenteropathy.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI:10.1111/nmo.14857
Revati Varma, Subhankar C Chakraborty, Shivabalan Kathavarayan Ramu, Duane D Burton, Brototo Deb, Michael D Ryks, Kelly J Feuerhak, Kent R Bailey, Adil E Bharucha
{"title":"Effects of ondansetron on symptoms during a gastric emptying study and enteral lipid challenge and on daily symptoms in diabetic gastroenteropathy.","authors":"Revati Varma, Subhankar C Chakraborty, Shivabalan Kathavarayan Ramu, Duane D Burton, Brototo Deb, Michael D Ryks, Kelly J Feuerhak, Kent R Bailey, Adil E Bharucha","doi":"10.1111/nmo.14857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study compared the effects of ondansetron and placebo in patients with diabetes mellitus and symptoms of dyspepsia (diabetic gastroenteropathy [DGE]).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of ondansetron tablets (8 mg) three times daily for 4 weeks in DGE patients. Symptoms were assessed with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index daily diaries. Gastric emptying (GE) of solids (scintigraphy) and duodenal lipid infusions (300 kcal over 2 h) were each assessed twice, with placebo and ondansetron. Drug effects on GE, symptoms during the GE study and during lipid infusion, and daily symptoms were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of 41 patients, 37 completed both GE studies and one completed 1; 31 completed both lipid infusions and four only placebo; and all 35 randomized patients completed 4 weeks of treatment. Compared to placebo, ondansetron reduced the severity of fullness (p = 0.02) and belching (p = 0.049) during lipid infusion but did not affect GE T<sub>1/2</sub>. Both ondansetron and placebo improved daily symptoms versus the baseline period (p < 0.05), but the differences were not significant. In the analysis of covariance of daily symptoms during the treatment period, the interaction term between treatment and the acute effect of ondansetron on symptoms during lipid challenge was significant (p = .024).</p><p><strong>Conclusions & inferences: </strong>Ondansetron significantly reduced fullness during enteral lipid infusion in patients with DGE. Overall, ondansetron did not improve daily symptoms versus placebo. But patients in whom ondansetron improved symptoms during enteral lipid challenge were perhaps more likely to experience symptom relief during daily treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19123,"journal":{"name":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321918/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.14857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study compared the effects of ondansetron and placebo in patients with diabetes mellitus and symptoms of dyspepsia (diabetic gastroenteropathy [DGE]).

Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of ondansetron tablets (8 mg) three times daily for 4 weeks in DGE patients. Symptoms were assessed with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index daily diaries. Gastric emptying (GE) of solids (scintigraphy) and duodenal lipid infusions (300 kcal over 2 h) were each assessed twice, with placebo and ondansetron. Drug effects on GE, symptoms during the GE study and during lipid infusion, and daily symptoms were analyzed.

Key results: Of 41 patients, 37 completed both GE studies and one completed 1; 31 completed both lipid infusions and four only placebo; and all 35 randomized patients completed 4 weeks of treatment. Compared to placebo, ondansetron reduced the severity of fullness (p = 0.02) and belching (p = 0.049) during lipid infusion but did not affect GE T1/2. Both ondansetron and placebo improved daily symptoms versus the baseline period (p < 0.05), but the differences were not significant. In the analysis of covariance of daily symptoms during the treatment period, the interaction term between treatment and the acute effect of ondansetron on symptoms during lipid challenge was significant (p = .024).

Conclusions & inferences: Ondansetron significantly reduced fullness during enteral lipid infusion in patients with DGE. Overall, ondansetron did not improve daily symptoms versus placebo. But patients in whom ondansetron improved symptoms during enteral lipid challenge were perhaps more likely to experience symptom relief during daily treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
昂丹司琼对胃排空研究和肠道脂质挑战期间症状以及糖尿病胃肠病日常症状的影响。
研究背景本研究比较了昂丹司琼和安慰剂对有消化不良症状(糖尿病胃肠病 [DGE])的糖尿病患者的作用:我们对糖尿病胃肠病患者进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究,研究对象是昂丹司琼片(8 毫克),每天三次,连续服用 4 周。症状通过胃痉挛卡迪纳尔症状指数每日日记进行评估。固体食物的胃排空(GE)(闪烁扫描)和十二指肠脂质输注(300 千卡,2 小时)各评估两次,分别使用安慰剂和昂丹司琼。分析了药物对胃肠道造影的影响、胃肠道造影研究期间和输注脂质期间的症状以及日常症状:在 41 名患者中,37 人完成了两次 GE 研究,1 人只完成了一次;31 人完成了两次脂质输注,4 人只完成了安慰剂输注;所有 35 名随机患者都完成了 4 周的治疗。与安慰剂相比,昂丹司琼能减轻输注脂质时的饱胀感(p = 0.02)和嗳气(p = 0.049),但不影响 GE T1/2。与基线期相比,昂丹司琼和安慰剂都能改善日常症状(p 结论与推论:昂丹司琼能明显减轻 DGE 患者在肠道输注脂质期间的饱胀感。总体而言,与安慰剂相比,昂丹司琼并不能改善日常症状。但是,昂丹司琼能改善肠道脂质挑战时症状的患者在日常治疗中症状缓解的可能性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Neurogastroenterology and Motility 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.60%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurogastroenterology & Motility (NMO) is the official Journal of the European Society of Neurogastroenterology & Motility (ESNM) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). It is edited by James Galligan, Albert Bredenoord, and Stephen Vanner. The editorial and peer review process is independent of the societies affiliated to the journal and publisher: Neither the ANMS, the ESNM or the Publisher have editorial decision-making power. Whenever these are relevant to the content being considered or published, the editors, journal management committee and editorial board declare their interests and affiliations.
期刊最新文献
Cyclic vomiting syndrome: A patient/parent perspective. Role of prokinetics in ineffective esophageal motility: A call for broader consideration and future innovations. Third generation sequencing analysis detects significant differences in duodenal microbiome composition between functional dyspepsia patients and control subjects. Algorithms or biomarkers in patients with lower DGBI? Antidiarrheal, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of Anethum graveolens L. fruit extract on castor oil-induced diarrhea in rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1