Can ultrasound-guided medial branch blocks be used to select patients for cervical facet joint radiofrequency neurotomy? - A matched retrospective cohort validation study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnae054
Robert Burnham, Rory Trow, James Trow, Ashley Smith, Taylor Burnham
{"title":"Can ultrasound-guided medial branch blocks be used to select patients for cervical facet joint radiofrequency neurotomy? - A matched retrospective cohort validation study.","authors":"Robert Burnham, Rory Trow, James Trow, Ashley Smith, Taylor Burnham","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnae054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medial branch blocks are used to select patients for cervical facet joint radiofrequency neurotomy (CRFN). Blocks are typically performed under fluoroscopic guidance (FLB). The validity of ultrasound guided blocks (USB) is not well established. No prior research has compared cervical USB versus FLB validity using CRFN outcome as the criterion standard.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate cervical USB versus FLB validity using CRFN outcome as the criterion standard.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Demographic and outcome data were extracted from the EMRs of two affiliated MSK pain management clinics for all patients between 2015 and 2023 inclusive who had cervical USB leading to CRFN. CRFN outcomes of each USB patient were compared to a matched FLB patient from the RFN outcome database of the same clinics. Matching variables included patient age, sex, pain duration, diagnostics/prognostic block paradigm and CRFN number. Each patient completed a NRS pain score and Pain Disability Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (PDQQ) just before and 3-months post-CRFN. At repeat CRFN, patients provided a retrospective estimate of the duration and average magnitude (%) of relief following the CRFN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>USB and FLB groups were comprised of 27 patients (58 RFNs) and 38 patients (58 RFNs) respectively. Post RFN NRS pain severity and PDQQ-S scores demonstrated comparable (p > 0.05) absolute improvements, proportion of patients achieving ≥50% improvement, and attainment of MCID. Retrospective estimates of pain relief magnitude and duration were also comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study finds cervical USB and FLB to be comparably valid as defined by their ability to predict CRFN outcome. Within the limitations of operator competence, USB can be used to select patients for CRFN.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnae054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medial branch blocks are used to select patients for cervical facet joint radiofrequency neurotomy (CRFN). Blocks are typically performed under fluoroscopic guidance (FLB). The validity of ultrasound guided blocks (USB) is not well established. No prior research has compared cervical USB versus FLB validity using CRFN outcome as the criterion standard.

Objective: To evaluate cervical USB versus FLB validity using CRFN outcome as the criterion standard.

Methods: Demographic and outcome data were extracted from the EMRs of two affiliated MSK pain management clinics for all patients between 2015 and 2023 inclusive who had cervical USB leading to CRFN. CRFN outcomes of each USB patient were compared to a matched FLB patient from the RFN outcome database of the same clinics. Matching variables included patient age, sex, pain duration, diagnostics/prognostic block paradigm and CRFN number. Each patient completed a NRS pain score and Pain Disability Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (PDQQ) just before and 3-months post-CRFN. At repeat CRFN, patients provided a retrospective estimate of the duration and average magnitude (%) of relief following the CRFN.

Results: USB and FLB groups were comprised of 27 patients (58 RFNs) and 38 patients (58 RFNs) respectively. Post RFN NRS pain severity and PDQQ-S scores demonstrated comparable (p > 0.05) absolute improvements, proportion of patients achieving ≥50% improvement, and attainment of MCID. Retrospective estimates of pain relief magnitude and duration were also comparable.

Conclusions: This study finds cervical USB and FLB to be comparably valid as defined by their ability to predict CRFN outcome. Within the limitations of operator competence, USB can be used to select patients for CRFN.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声引导下的内侧支阻滞可用于选择颈椎面关节射频神经切除术的患者吗?- 一项匹配的回顾性队列验证研究。
背景:内侧支阻滞用于选择颈椎面关节射频神经切断术(CRFN)的患者。阻滞通常在透视引导(FLB)下进行。超声引导下阻滞(USB)的有效性尚未得到充分证实。之前没有研究以 CRFN 结果为标准,比较颈椎 USB 与 FLB 的有效性:以 CRFN 结果为标准,评估宫颈 USB 与 FLB 的有效性:从两家附属 MSK 疼痛管理诊所的 EMR 中提取了 2015 年至 2023 年(含 2023 年)期间所有接受颈椎 USB 导致 CRFN 的患者的人口统计学和结果数据。将每位 USB 患者的 CRFN 结果与同一诊所 RFN 结果数据库中匹配的 FLB 患者进行比较。匹配变量包括患者的年龄、性别、疼痛持续时间、诊断/预后阻断范式和 CRFN 编号。每位患者在 CRFN 前和 CRFN 后 3 个月都填写了 NRS 疼痛评分和疼痛残疾生活质量问卷 (PDQQ)。在再次进行 CRFN 时,患者对 CRFN 后疼痛缓解的持续时间和平均程度(%)进行了回顾性评估:USB组和FLB组分别有27名患者(58个RFN)和38名患者(58个RFN)。RFN后NRS疼痛严重程度和PDQQ-S评分的绝对改善程度、改善程度≥50%的患者比例和达到MCID的比例相当(P>0.05)。对疼痛缓解程度和持续时间的回顾性估计也具有可比性:本研究发现,根据预测 CRFN 结果的能力,颈椎 USB 和 FLB 的有效性相当。在操作者能力有限的情况下,USB 可用于选择 CRFN 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
Case-Based Peer Teaching for Pain Medicine Fellows: A Curriculum for Diverse Residency Backgrounds Exploring new educational approaches in neuropathic pain: Assessing accuracy and consistency of AI responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: Clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Assessment of chronic pain and its association with functional capacity in patients with HTLV-1. Examination of a repaired medial meniscus: ultrasound's forte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1