Analysis of laboratory markers in body contouring procedures after bariatric surgery does not indicate particular risks for perioperative complications.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Perioperative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-27 DOI:10.1186/s13741-024-00422-7
Maximilian C Stumpfe, Juliane Platzer, Raymund E Horch, Alexander Geierlehner, Andreas Arkudas, Wibke Mueller-Seubert, Aijia Cai, Theresa Promny, Ingo Ludolph
{"title":"Analysis of laboratory markers in body contouring procedures after bariatric surgery does not indicate particular risks for perioperative complications.","authors":"Maximilian C Stumpfe, Juliane Platzer, Raymund E Horch, Alexander Geierlehner, Andreas Arkudas, Wibke Mueller-Seubert, Aijia Cai, Theresa Promny, Ingo Ludolph","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00422-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Body contouring surgery after massive weight loss is associated with different risk factors. Wound healing disorders and seromas commonly occur postoperatively. Bariatric interventions lead to massive weight loss with excess skin and soft tissue. In this study, perioperatively collected laboratory markers of this special patient population were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-nine patients were analyzed retrospectively regarding bariatric surgery, weight loss, body contouring surgery, laboratory markers, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Body contouring surgery (n = 117) was performed in 59 patients. Weight loss was achieved after gastric bypass (40.1%), gastric banding (33.9%), or sleeve gastrectomy (26.0%), with an average of 69.2 kg. The most common body contouring procedure included abdominoplasty (n = 50), followed by thigh lift (n = 29), mammaplasty (n = 19), brachioplasty (n = 14), and upper body lift (n = 5). Analysis of laboratory markers revealed no exceptional and clinically relevant variations. Correlation analysis revealed associations between resection weight, amount of drain fluid, and particular laboratory markers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analysis of perioperative laboratory markers in this special patient population after massive weight loss did not indicate clinically relevant risk factors regardless of the type of bariatric or body contouring surgery. Body contouring surgeries after bariatric interventions prove to be safe and low risk concerning perioperative laboratory markers and postoperative hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11210174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00422-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Body contouring surgery after massive weight loss is associated with different risk factors. Wound healing disorders and seromas commonly occur postoperatively. Bariatric interventions lead to massive weight loss with excess skin and soft tissue. In this study, perioperatively collected laboratory markers of this special patient population were analyzed.

Methods: Fifty-nine patients were analyzed retrospectively regarding bariatric surgery, weight loss, body contouring surgery, laboratory markers, and complication rates.

Results: Body contouring surgery (n = 117) was performed in 59 patients. Weight loss was achieved after gastric bypass (40.1%), gastric banding (33.9%), or sleeve gastrectomy (26.0%), with an average of 69.2 kg. The most common body contouring procedure included abdominoplasty (n = 50), followed by thigh lift (n = 29), mammaplasty (n = 19), brachioplasty (n = 14), and upper body lift (n = 5). Analysis of laboratory markers revealed no exceptional and clinically relevant variations. Correlation analysis revealed associations between resection weight, amount of drain fluid, and particular laboratory markers.

Conclusion: Analysis of perioperative laboratory markers in this special patient population after massive weight loss did not indicate clinically relevant risk factors regardless of the type of bariatric or body contouring surgery. Body contouring surgeries after bariatric interventions prove to be safe and low risk concerning perioperative laboratory markers and postoperative hospitalization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对减肥手术后身体塑形过程中的实验室指标进行分析,并未发现围手术期并发症的特殊风险。
背景:大量减肥后进行身体塑形手术有不同的风险因素。术后通常会出现伤口愈合障碍和血清瘤。减肥手术会导致体重大量减轻,并伴有多余的皮肤和软组织。本研究对这一特殊患者群体围手术期收集的实验室指标进行了分析:方法:对 59 名患者的减肥手术、体重减轻、身体塑形手术、实验室指标和并发症发生率进行回顾性分析:结果:59 名患者接受了身体塑形手术(n = 117)。通过胃旁路术(40.1%)、胃束带术(33.9%)或袖状胃切除术(26.0%)实现减肥,平均减肥69.2公斤。最常见的塑身手术包括腹部整形术(50 例),其次是大腿提升术(29 例)、乳房整形术(19 例)、肱骨整形术(14 例)和上半身提升术(5 例)。对实验室指标的分析表明,没有发现特殊的临床相关变异。相关性分析显示,切除体重、引流液量和特定实验室指标之间存在关联:结论:无论减肥手术或塑身手术的类型如何,对大量减重后的这一特殊患者群体进行围手术期实验室指标分析,均未发现与临床相关的风险因素。事实证明,减肥干预后的身体塑形手术是安全的,而且围手术期实验室指标和术后住院风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Length of stay after colorectal surgery in Italy: the gap between "fit for" and "actual" discharge in a prospective cohort of 4529 cases. Construction and application of a stratified nursing intervention program for postoperative delirium after Stanford type A aortic dissection: a quasi-experimental trial. Global research trends in music therapy for surgery: a bibliometric analysis (2009-2023). Clients' experiences in their first entry to the operating room: a descriptive phenomenological study. The effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) application on airway problems in pediatric patients with subglottic stenosis who undergo balloon dilatation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1