A Qualitative Program Evaluation of a Digital Peer Support Group for Formerly Incarcerated People.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Will Boles, Lauren Nguyen, Thad Tatum, Jarrod Wall, Alexandria Van Dall, Anjali Niyogi, Anna Sacks, Bruce Reilly, Claire Mulhollem, Ashley Wennerstrom
{"title":"A Qualitative Program Evaluation of a Digital Peer Support Group for Formerly Incarcerated People.","authors":"Will Boles, Lauren Nguyen, Thad Tatum, Jarrod Wall, Alexandria Van Dall, Anjali Niyogi, Anna Sacks, Bruce Reilly, Claire Mulhollem, Ashley Wennerstrom","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A qualitative program evaluation of the Formerly Incarcerated Peer Support (FIPS) group, a peer-led mutual support group for formerly incarcerated people, was conducted to understand participant perceptions of (1) digital delivery via Zoom, (2) curriculum content, (3) roles of group participants, and (4) therapeutic value of FIPS group as it relates to traumatic experiences in prison and ongoing challenges after release.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a community-based participatory action research approach, a qualitative evaluation was conducted with participants in either the 2020 or 2021 curriculum. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, transcribed, de-identified, coded, and analyzed via applied thematic analysis and results reviewed with participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 75 formerly incarcerated participants, 20 interviews were conducted and recorded (n = 20). All participants were male, 85% were Black, and the average age was 54.8 years old. Zoom delivery was not preferred, but feasible. Most appreciated the comprehensive and holistic curriculum that enabled peers to gain practical and emotional social support in different areas of life after release. The facilitator's experience with prison programs and relationships within peer networks was essential for recruitment and retention. Participants described (1) feelings of acceptance, (2) examples of teaching and learning from peers' improved insight, trigger management, response modification to stressors, and (3) improved understanding within relationships with those who have not been incarcerated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital delivery of peer-led psychosocial support groups for formerly incarcerated people is feasible and impactful. Future research can further characterize the lingering impacts of institutional traumas and quantify changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"18 2","pages":"167-182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A qualitative program evaluation of the Formerly Incarcerated Peer Support (FIPS) group, a peer-led mutual support group for formerly incarcerated people, was conducted to understand participant perceptions of (1) digital delivery via Zoom, (2) curriculum content, (3) roles of group participants, and (4) therapeutic value of FIPS group as it relates to traumatic experiences in prison and ongoing challenges after release.

Methods: Using a community-based participatory action research approach, a qualitative evaluation was conducted with participants in either the 2020 or 2021 curriculum. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, transcribed, de-identified, coded, and analyzed via applied thematic analysis and results reviewed with participants.

Results: Of 75 formerly incarcerated participants, 20 interviews were conducted and recorded (n = 20). All participants were male, 85% were Black, and the average age was 54.8 years old. Zoom delivery was not preferred, but feasible. Most appreciated the comprehensive and holistic curriculum that enabled peers to gain practical and emotional social support in different areas of life after release. The facilitator's experience with prison programs and relationships within peer networks was essential for recruitment and retention. Participants described (1) feelings of acceptance, (2) examples of teaching and learning from peers' improved insight, trigger management, response modification to stressors, and (3) improved understanding within relationships with those who have not been incarcerated.

Conclusions: Digital delivery of peer-led psychosocial support groups for formerly incarcerated people is feasible and impactful. Future research can further characterize the lingering impacts of institutional traumas and quantify changes.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对针对刑满释放人员的数字同伴互助小组的定性项目评估。
目标:前被监禁者同伴支持(FIPS)小组是一个由同伴领导的针对前被监禁者的互助小组,我们对该小组进行了定性项目评估,以了解参与者对以下方面的看法:(1)通过 Zoom 进行的数字交付;(2)课程内容;(3)小组参与者的角色;以及(4)FIPS 小组的治疗价值,因为它与监狱中的创伤经历和出狱后的持续挑战有关:采用基于社区的参与式行动研究方法,对 2020 年或 2021 年课程的参与者进行了定性评估。通过 Zoom 进行了半结构化访谈,对访谈内容进行了转录、去标识、编码,并通过应用主题分析法进行了分析,还与参与者一起对结果进行了审查:在 75 名曾被监禁的参与者中,进行了 20 次访谈并记录在案(n = 20)。所有参与者均为男性,85%为黑人,平均年龄为 54.8 岁。缩放式教学不是首选,但可行。大多数人都对综合全面的课程表示赞赏,该课程使同龄人能够在出狱后的生活中获得不同领域的实际和情感上的社会支持。主持人在监狱项目和同伴网络关系方面的经验对于招募和留住参与者至关重要。参与者描述了(1)接受的感觉,(2)从同伴提高洞察力、触发管理、对压力源的反应调整等方面的教学和学习实例,以及(3)在与未入狱者的关系中增进理解:为曾被监禁者提供由同龄人主导的社会心理支持小组的数字化服务是可行且有影响力的。未来的研究可以进一步描述机构创伤的持续影响,并对变化进行量化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊最新文献
Lessons from Two Latino Communities Working with Academic Partners to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing. Infectious Disease Preparedness for Homeless Populations: Recommendations from a Community-Academic Partnership. Evaluating the Impact and Effectiveness of Flint's Community Ethics Review Board (CBOP-CERB): A Pilot Study. Bridging the Gap: Addressing Immigrant Health Through Community-initiated Screening Events. Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1