Sexual and Reproductive Justice and Health Equity for LGBTQ+ Women.

IF 1.1 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of Lesbian Studies Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI:10.1080/10894160.2024.2369434
Melissa M Ertl, Meredith R Maroney, Andréa Becker, Margaret M Paschen-Wolff, Amelia Blankenau, Susie Hoffman, Susan Tross
{"title":"Sexual and Reproductive Justice and Health Equity for LGBTQ+ Women.","authors":"Melissa M Ertl, Meredith R Maroney, Andréa Becker, Margaret M Paschen-Wolff, Amelia Blankenau, Susie Hoffman, Susan Tross","doi":"10.1080/10894160.2024.2369434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>LGBTQ+ women have long been overlooked in sexual and reproductive health research. However, recent research has established that LGBTQ+ women have unique and specific needs that need to be addressed in order to improve effectiveness of sexual health education and practice with this historically and presently underserved population. Informed by a reproductive justice framework coupled with liberation psychology theory, this review discusses the current state of sexual and reproductive health and technologies among LGBTQ+ women. In particular, we focus on a range of HIV prevention and reproductive technologies and their use and promotion, including the internal condom, abortion, oral contraceptives, dapivirine ring, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, intrauterine device, and other less studied options, such as the contraceptive sponge. Grounded in an intersectional framing, this review acknowledges the intersecting systems of oppression that affect multiply marginalized women inequitably and disproportionately. A sociohistorical, critical lens is applied to acknowledge the well-documented racist origins of reproductive health technologies and ongoing coercive practices that have led to medical mistrust among marginalized and stigmatized communities, particularly racialized LGBTQ+ women, women with disabilities, and women who are poor or incarcerated. Moreover, we discuss the urgent need to center LGBTQ+ women in research and clinical care, community-engaged health promotion efforts, affirming non-heteronormative sexual health education, and health policies that prioritize autonomy and dismantle structural barriers for this population. We conclude with recommendations and future directions in this area to remedy entrenched disparities in health.</p>","PeriodicalId":46044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lesbian Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10894160.2024.2369434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

LGBTQ+ women have long been overlooked in sexual and reproductive health research. However, recent research has established that LGBTQ+ women have unique and specific needs that need to be addressed in order to improve effectiveness of sexual health education and practice with this historically and presently underserved population. Informed by a reproductive justice framework coupled with liberation psychology theory, this review discusses the current state of sexual and reproductive health and technologies among LGBTQ+ women. In particular, we focus on a range of HIV prevention and reproductive technologies and their use and promotion, including the internal condom, abortion, oral contraceptives, dapivirine ring, HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis, intrauterine device, and other less studied options, such as the contraceptive sponge. Grounded in an intersectional framing, this review acknowledges the intersecting systems of oppression that affect multiply marginalized women inequitably and disproportionately. A sociohistorical, critical lens is applied to acknowledge the well-documented racist origins of reproductive health technologies and ongoing coercive practices that have led to medical mistrust among marginalized and stigmatized communities, particularly racialized LGBTQ+ women, women with disabilities, and women who are poor or incarcerated. Moreover, we discuss the urgent need to center LGBTQ+ women in research and clinical care, community-engaged health promotion efforts, affirming non-heteronormative sexual health education, and health policies that prioritize autonomy and dismantle structural barriers for this population. We conclude with recommendations and future directions in this area to remedy entrenched disparities in health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性者和跨性别者的性与生殖公正和健康平等。
长期以来,LGBTQ+ 女性在性健康和生殖健康研究中一直被忽视。然而,最近的研究已经证实,LGBTQ+ 女性有独特而特殊的需求,需要加以解决,以提高性健康教育和实践对这一历史上和目前服务不足的人群的有效性。在生殖正义框架和解放心理学理论的指导下,本综述讨论了 LGBTQ+ 女性的性健康和生殖健康及技术现状。特别是,我们关注一系列艾滋病预防和生殖技术及其使用和推广,包括内置避孕套、人工流产、口服避孕药、达匹韦林环、艾滋病暴露前预防、宫内节育器以及其他研究较少的选择,如海绵避孕。本综述以交叉性框架为基础,承认交叉性压迫体系对多重边缘化妇女造成了不公平和不成比例的影响。我们运用社会历史的批判性视角,承认生殖健康技术的种族主义起源和持续的胁迫性做法已被充分记录在案,这导致了边缘化和被污名化群体对医疗的不信任,尤其是种族化的 LGBTQ+ 女性、残疾女性、贫困或被监禁的女性。此外,我们还讨论了以 LGBTQ+ 女性为中心开展研究和临床护理的迫切需要、社区参与的健康促进工作、肯定非异性恋的性健康教育,以及优先考虑该群体自主性和消除结构性障碍的健康政策。最后,我们提出了这方面的建议和未来发展方向,以弥补根深蒂固的健康差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Lesbian Studies
Journal of Lesbian Studies SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Lesbian Studies examines the cultural, historical, and interpersonal impact of the lesbian experience on society, keeping all readers—professional, academic, or general—informed and up to date on current findings, resources, and community concerns. Independent scholars, professors, students, and lay people will find this interdisciplinary journal essential on the topic of lesbian studies!
期刊最新文献
"Then you tell me you've fallen in love with a tree": Queer ecologies in Ali Smith's short stories. Pockets of tenderness: Lesbian earth in Alison Bechdel's Fun Home. A systematic review of the prevalence and associated factors of mental health conditions among lesbian, bisexual, and other sexual minority women in Southeast Asia. Environmental Eros: the films of Barbara Hammer as "Creative Geographies"1. A retrospective study of sexual minority women's gendered sexuality: Butch and femme sex at the turn of the 21st century.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1