Perceived factors and barriers affecting physiotherapists' decision to use spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents: an international survey.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1080/10669817.2024.2363033
Jenifer L Dice, Jean-Michel Brismee, Frédéric P Froment, Janis Henricksen, Rebecca Sherwin, Jan Pool, Nikki Milne, Derek Clewley, Annalie Basson, Kenneth A Olson, Anita R Gross
{"title":"Perceived factors and barriers affecting physiotherapists' decision to use spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents: an international survey.","authors":"Jenifer L Dice, Jean-Michel Brismee, Frédéric P Froment, Janis Henricksen, Rebecca Sherwin, Jan Pool, Nikki Milne, Derek Clewley, Annalie Basson, Kenneth A Olson, Anita R Gross","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2024.2363033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify factors and barriers, which affect the utilisation of spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six international expert physiotherapists in manual therapy and paediatrics were invited to participate in a Delphi investigation using Qualtrics<sup>Ⓡ</sup>. In Round-1 physiotherapists selected from a list of factors and barriers affecting their decision to use spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the paediatric population and had opportunity to add to the list. Round-2 asked respondents to select as many factors and barriers that they agreed with, resulting in a frequency count. The subset of responses to questions around barriers and facilitators are the focus of this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve physiotherapists completed both rounds of the survey. Medical diagnosis, mechanism of injury, patient presentation, tolerance to handling, and therapist's knowledge of techniques were the dominant deciding factors to use spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents across spinal levels. More than 90% of the respondents selected manipulation as inappropriate among infants as their top barrier. Additional dominant barriers to using spinal manipulation among infants and children identified by ≥ 75% of the respondents included fear of injuring the patient, fear of litigation, lack of communication, lack of evidence, lack of guardian consent, and precision of the examination to inform clinical reasoning.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This international survey provides much needed insight regarding the factors and barriers physiotherapists should consider when contemplating the utilisation of spinal mobilisation and manipulation in the paediatric population.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":"32 3","pages":"295-303"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11216267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2363033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To identify factors and barriers, which affect the utilisation of spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents.

Methods: Twenty-six international expert physiotherapists in manual therapy and paediatrics were invited to participate in a Delphi investigation using Qualtrics. In Round-1 physiotherapists selected from a list of factors and barriers affecting their decision to use spinal manipulation and mobilisation in the paediatric population and had opportunity to add to the list. Round-2 asked respondents to select as many factors and barriers that they agreed with, resulting in a frequency count. The subset of responses to questions around barriers and facilitators are the focus of this study.

Results: Twelve physiotherapists completed both rounds of the survey. Medical diagnosis, mechanism of injury, patient presentation, tolerance to handling, and therapist's knowledge of techniques were the dominant deciding factors to use spinal manipulation and mobilisation among infants, children, and adolescents across spinal levels. More than 90% of the respondents selected manipulation as inappropriate among infants as their top barrier. Additional dominant barriers to using spinal manipulation among infants and children identified by ≥ 75% of the respondents included fear of injuring the patient, fear of litigation, lack of communication, lack of evidence, lack of guardian consent, and precision of the examination to inform clinical reasoning.

Conclusion: This international survey provides much needed insight regarding the factors and barriers physiotherapists should consider when contemplating the utilisation of spinal mobilisation and manipulation in the paediatric population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响物理治疗师决定在婴儿、儿童和青少年中使用脊柱手法和移动术的认知因素和障碍:一项国际调查。
目的确定影响婴儿、儿童和青少年使用脊柱手法和活动的因素和障碍:邀请 26 位国际手法治疗和儿科专家物理治疗师参与使用 QualtricsⓇ 进行的德尔菲调查。在第一轮调查中,物理治疗师从影响他们决定在儿科人群中使用脊柱手法和移动术的因素和障碍列表中进行选择,并有机会对列表进行补充。第二轮要求受访者尽可能多地选择他们同意的因素和障碍,从而得出频率计数。对障碍和促进因素问题的回答子集是本研究的重点:12 名物理治疗师完成了两轮调查。医学诊断、损伤机制、患者表现、对操作的耐受性以及治疗师的技术知识是决定在不同脊柱水平的婴儿、儿童和青少年中使用脊柱手法和移动术的主要因素。90%以上的受访者认为在婴儿中使用手法不合适,这是他们的首要障碍。≥75%的受访者认为在婴儿和儿童中使用脊柱手法的其他主要障碍包括:害怕伤害患者、害怕诉讼、缺乏沟通、缺乏证据、缺乏监护人的同意以及检查的精确性无法为临床推理提供依据:这项国际调查为物理治疗师在考虑对儿科患者进行脊柱活动和手法治疗时应考虑的因素和障碍提供了亟需的洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
期刊最新文献
Cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus autogenic muscle energy technique for chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Short-term effectiveness of dry needling on pain and ankle range of motion in athletes with medial tibial stress syndrome- a randomized control trial. Spinal mobilization in infants reconsidered. Author response to Eric Saedt "Spinal mobilization in infants reconsidered". Tendential and unscientific opinion regarding spinal manipulative therapy in the pediatric population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1