Pilot study of an online brief mindfulness-based intervention to improve the well-being of managers and reduce their stress at work.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-30 DOI:10.1080/10803548.2024.2358676
Ángela Asensio-Martínez, Lorena Adame, Alejandra Aguilar-Latorre, Benito Millán, Marta Domínguez-García, Rosa Magallón-Botaya
{"title":"Pilot study of an online brief mindfulness-based intervention to improve the well-being of managers and reduce their stress at work.","authors":"Ángela Asensio-Martínez, Lorena Adame, Alejandra Aguilar-Latorre, Benito Millán, Marta Domínguez-García, Rosa Magallón-Botaya","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2358676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. The COVID-19 pandemic, remote work and new technologies have heightened workplace pressures. Effective response and essential organizational changes require business leaders to be more adaptable, with managers' presence playing a pivotal role in successful implementation. The study assesses a brief mindfulness-based emotional regulation for managers (MBERM) intervention, to reduce workplace stress and enhance managerial well-being. <i>Methods</i>. An 8-week non-randomized controlled trial was conducted with a waiting list control group and an intervention group. Pre-post differences were measured by Student's <i>t</i> test or Wilcoxon test, and effect size calculated using the Hedge's <i>g</i> formula. The sample included 23 managers (17 men and six women) with average age 50 years. The study assessed anxiety and depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility, perceived self-efficacy, general work-related well-being, perceived stress and mindfulness. <i>Results</i>. Statistically significant changes were observed in the intervention group in depression, anxiety, work-related acceptance and action, general self-efficacy, exhaustion, alienation, stress and non-reactivity. The control group showed no statistically significant changes in any of the variables. <i>Conclusion</i>. The MBERM intervention could improve the emotional and work-related well-being of managers and reduce stress levels and burnout. Further study of this intervention is needed to promote adherence and ensure a long-term improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"858-866"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2358676","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives. The COVID-19 pandemic, remote work and new technologies have heightened workplace pressures. Effective response and essential organizational changes require business leaders to be more adaptable, with managers' presence playing a pivotal role in successful implementation. The study assesses a brief mindfulness-based emotional regulation for managers (MBERM) intervention, to reduce workplace stress and enhance managerial well-being. Methods. An 8-week non-randomized controlled trial was conducted with a waiting list control group and an intervention group. Pre-post differences were measured by Student's t test or Wilcoxon test, and effect size calculated using the Hedge's g formula. The sample included 23 managers (17 men and six women) with average age 50 years. The study assessed anxiety and depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility, perceived self-efficacy, general work-related well-being, perceived stress and mindfulness. Results. Statistically significant changes were observed in the intervention group in depression, anxiety, work-related acceptance and action, general self-efficacy, exhaustion, alienation, stress and non-reactivity. The control group showed no statistically significant changes in any of the variables. Conclusion. The MBERM intervention could improve the emotional and work-related well-being of managers and reduce stress levels and burnout. Further study of this intervention is needed to promote adherence and ensure a long-term improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于正念的在线简短干预试点研究,旨在提高管理人员的幸福感并减轻其工作压力。
目标。COVID-19 大流行病、远程工作和新技术加剧了工作场所的压力。有效应对和必要的组织变革要求企业领导者具有更强的适应能力,而管理者的存在对成功实施起着关键作用。本研究评估了基于正念的管理人员情绪调节(MBERM)简短干预,以减轻工作压力,提高管理人员的幸福感。研究方法进行了一项为期 8 周的非随机对照试验,分为等待名单对照组和干预组。前后差异通过学生 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 检验进行测量,效应大小通过 Hedge's g 公式计算。样本包括 23 名管理人员(17 名男性和 6 名女性),平均年龄为 50 岁。研究评估了焦虑和抑郁症状、心理灵活性、感知自我效能、与工作相关的总体幸福感、感知压力和正念。研究结果干预组在抑郁、焦虑、与工作相关的接受和行动、一般自我效能感、疲惫、疏离感、压力和非反应性方面都有明显的统计学变化。对照组在任何变量上都没有统计学意义上的明显变化。结论MBERM 干预措施可以改善管理人员的情绪和工作相关福祉,降低压力水平和职业倦怠。需要对这一干预措施进行进一步研究,以促进坚持并确保长期改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Exercises to improve directional sound recognition by visually impaired users heading to the workplace. The impact of safety leadership on safety behaviors of aircraft rescue and firefighting personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Determining the effect levels of augmented decent work criteria in sustainable economic development with the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Evaluation of success factors of occupational health and safety management systems with the analytical hierarchy process: the case of ground handling companies in Turkey. Using benevolent leadership to improve safety behaviour in the construction industry: a moderated mediation model of safety knowledge and safety training and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1