Breaking Down Silos in the Workplace: A Framework to Foster Collaboration.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Management and Practice Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1097/PHH.0000000000002007
Anita A Jones, Justin Uhd, Charlotte D Kabore, Kelly A Cornett
{"title":"Breaking Down Silos in the Workplace: A Framework to Foster Collaboration.","authors":"Anita A Jones, Justin Uhd, Charlotte D Kabore, Kelly A Cornett","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Employees are often placed within an organization based on their respective roles or duties, which can lead to vertical and horizontal organizational silos. Organizational silos may restrict information, resources, and stymie progress and innovation. This analysis presents a framework to mitigate silos and overcome communication barriers within an organization by increasing collaboration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The project team examined results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) 2020 Employee Viewpoint Survey Results and conducted 19 key informant discussions with NCCDPHP employees. Participants were asked to provide feedback on (1) understanding silos in the workplace and (2) best practices for reducing silos and fostering collaboration. A thematic analysis was conducted to understand organizational silos, the motivation to reduce silos, and identify best practices and strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents felt that siloing exists at the division and branch levels; however, 95% of respondents were motivated to reduce silos. Fifty-eight percent of respondents identified that institutional factors such as the organizational structure (n = 8) and red tape/bureaucracy (n = 3) contribute to siloing. Additional behaviors and actions that perpetuate silos were identified, and efforts to reduce silos were categorized to propose a model: Framework to Foster Collaboration for improving organizational collaborative efforts.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Key themes included inclusion, shared goals and vision, bi-directional communication, and relationship building and developing trust as critical elements for improving collaboration and creating synergy across teams in efforts to reduce silos in the workplace.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"E306-E311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Employees are often placed within an organization based on their respective roles or duties, which can lead to vertical and horizontal organizational silos. Organizational silos may restrict information, resources, and stymie progress and innovation. This analysis presents a framework to mitigate silos and overcome communication barriers within an organization by increasing collaboration.

Methods: The project team examined results from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP) 2020 Employee Viewpoint Survey Results and conducted 19 key informant discussions with NCCDPHP employees. Participants were asked to provide feedback on (1) understanding silos in the workplace and (2) best practices for reducing silos and fostering collaboration. A thematic analysis was conducted to understand organizational silos, the motivation to reduce silos, and identify best practices and strategies.

Results: Respondents felt that siloing exists at the division and branch levels; however, 95% of respondents were motivated to reduce silos. Fifty-eight percent of respondents identified that institutional factors such as the organizational structure (n = 8) and red tape/bureaucracy (n = 3) contribute to siloing. Additional behaviors and actions that perpetuate silos were identified, and efforts to reduce silos were categorized to propose a model: Framework to Foster Collaboration for improving organizational collaborative efforts.

Discussion and conclusion: Key themes included inclusion, shared goals and vision, bi-directional communication, and relationship building and developing trust as critical elements for improving collaboration and creating synergy across teams in efforts to reduce silos in the workplace.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
打破工作场所的隔阂:促进合作的框架》。
导言:员工往往根据各自的角色或职责被安排在组织内,这可能导致纵向和横向的组织孤岛。组织孤岛可能会限制信息和资源,阻碍进步和创新。本分析报告提出了一个框架,通过加强合作来缓解组织内的孤岛现象,克服沟通障碍:项目小组研究了疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)、国家慢性病预防和健康促进中心(NCCDPHP)2020 年员工观点调查结果,并与国家慢性病预防和健康促进中心的员工进行了 19 次关键信息员讨论。与会者被要求就以下方面提供反馈意见:(1)了解工作场所中的 "孤岛";(2)减少 "孤岛 "和促进合作的最佳做法。我们进行了专题分析,以了解组织中的 "孤岛 "现象、减少 "孤岛 "现象的动机,并确定最佳做法和战略:结果:受访者认为部门和分支机构存在 "孤岛 "现象,但 95% 的受访者有减少 "孤岛 "的动机。58%的受访者认为,组织结构(8 人)和繁文缛节/官僚主义(3 人)等制度因素导致了 "各自为政"。受访者还指出了造成 "孤岛 "现象的其他行为和行动,并对减少 "孤岛 "现象的努力进行了分类,从而提出了一种模式:讨论和结论:讨论和结论:关键主题包括包容、共同目标和愿景、双向沟通、建立关系和发展信任,这些都是在工作场所努力减少孤岛的过程中改善协作和创造跨团队协同效应的关键要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
期刊最新文献
Perceptions of Criticality and Frequency of Tasks by the Public Health Workforce, 2022. Real-Time Dashboard for Identifying Overdose Touchpoints in Indiana. Assessing Facility Readiness to Provide Equitable Birthing Care in New York State: A Baseline Survey. Training the Next Generation of Local Public Health Leaders: A Case Study of Community Health Organizers in Pennsylvania. Maintaining and Improving Virtual Call Centers for Public Health: The CUNY Recovery Corps Experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1