Development and Validation of an Evidence-Based Home Pursed Lip Breathing Protocol for Improving Health Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Older People Nursing Pub Date : 2024-06-30 DOI:10.1111/opn.12627
Houqiang Huang, Jun Da, Roger Watson, Mark Hayter, Min Huang
{"title":"Development and Validation of an Evidence-Based Home Pursed Lip Breathing Protocol for Improving Health Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","authors":"Houqiang Huang,&nbsp;Jun Da,&nbsp;Roger Watson,&nbsp;Mark Hayter,&nbsp;Min Huang","doi":"10.1111/opn.12627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To develop and validate an evidence-based home pursed lip breathing (PLB) intervention protocol for improving related health outcomes (e.g., dyspnea and exercise capability) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to present a detailed intervention development process.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This home PLB intervention protocol employed phase one of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions to guide the development process of the PLB intervention. We searched for research evidence on 5 July 2023 from several databases, including PubMed, Embase (via Ovid), Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and China Biology Medicine Disk (CBM). Using the content validity index, a panel of experts assessed the appropriateness of the PLB protocol.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We developed the preliminary home PLB intervention protocol on the basis of several underlying rationales, which encompass the extension of expiration time, enhancement of respiratory muscle strength, augmentation of tidal volume and integration of the most reliable research evidence obtained from four systematic reviews, five RCTs, five clinical trials, and 10 recommendations. We structured the PLB intervention with a designated time ratio of inspiration to expiration, set at 1:2. Additionally, this study recommends that the training parameters of the PLB intervention were as follows: three sessions per day, each lasting for 10 min, over 8 weeks. Individualised PLB training intensity adjusted the inhalation component according to each participant's tolerance level while emphasising the exhalation phase to ensure the complete expulsion of air from the lungs. The home PLB intervention protocol established strong content validity through consensus, which was reached among all panel experts. The item-level and scale-level content validity indices (CVIs) reached a maximum score of 1.0, indicating a high level of agreement and credibility in the protocol's content as evaluated by the expert panel.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>An optimal evidence-based home PLB protocol has been adapted and developed to manage health-related outcomes of patients with COPD. The protocol is transparent and fully supported by relevant mechanisms, concrete evidence, recommendations and experts' consensus.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Practice</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, we consulted patients with COPD about the ‘Prepared Conditions Before PLB Practice’, to ensure appropriate measures to prevent patients with COPD from potential risks. In addition, patients with COPD also contributed to the PLB exercise frequency distribution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.12627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To develop and validate an evidence-based home pursed lip breathing (PLB) intervention protocol for improving related health outcomes (e.g., dyspnea and exercise capability) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to present a detailed intervention development process.

Methods

This home PLB intervention protocol employed phase one of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions to guide the development process of the PLB intervention. We searched for research evidence on 5 July 2023 from several databases, including PubMed, Embase (via Ovid), Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and China Biology Medicine Disk (CBM). Using the content validity index, a panel of experts assessed the appropriateness of the PLB protocol.

Results

We developed the preliminary home PLB intervention protocol on the basis of several underlying rationales, which encompass the extension of expiration time, enhancement of respiratory muscle strength, augmentation of tidal volume and integration of the most reliable research evidence obtained from four systematic reviews, five RCTs, five clinical trials, and 10 recommendations. We structured the PLB intervention with a designated time ratio of inspiration to expiration, set at 1:2. Additionally, this study recommends that the training parameters of the PLB intervention were as follows: three sessions per day, each lasting for 10 min, over 8 weeks. Individualised PLB training intensity adjusted the inhalation component according to each participant's tolerance level while emphasising the exhalation phase to ensure the complete expulsion of air from the lungs. The home PLB intervention protocol established strong content validity through consensus, which was reached among all panel experts. The item-level and scale-level content validity indices (CVIs) reached a maximum score of 1.0, indicating a high level of agreement and credibility in the protocol's content as evaluated by the expert panel.

Conclusion

An optimal evidence-based home PLB protocol has been adapted and developed to manage health-related outcomes of patients with COPD. The protocol is transparent and fully supported by relevant mechanisms, concrete evidence, recommendations and experts' consensus.

Implications for Practice

In this study, we consulted patients with COPD about the ‘Prepared Conditions Before PLB Practice’, to ensure appropriate measures to prevent patients with COPD from potential risks. In addition, patients with COPD also contributed to the PLB exercise frequency distribution.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为改善慢性阻塞性肺病患者的健康状况,开发并验证基于证据的家庭噘唇呼吸方案。
目的:开发和验证基于证据的家庭纯唇呼吸(PLB)干预方案,以改善慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的相关健康结果(如呼吸困难和运动能力),并介绍详细的干预开发过程:该家庭 PLB 干预方案采用了医学研究委员会(MRC)复杂干预措施开发与评估框架的第一阶段,以指导 PLB 干预措施的开发过程。我们于2023年7月5日在多个数据库中搜索研究证据,包括PubMed、Embase(通过Ovid)、Cochrane图书馆、谷歌学术和中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)。专家小组使用内容效度指数评估了小儿脑瘫干预方案的适宜性:我们根据延长呼气时间、增强呼吸肌力量、增加潮气量等几个基本原理,并整合了4篇系统综述、5项RCT、5项临床试验和10项建议中最可靠的研究证据,制定了初步的家庭PLB干预方案。我们将吸气与呼气的时间比设定为 1:2,从而构建了 PLB 干预方案。此外,本研究还建议 PLB 干预的训练参数如下:每天三次,每次 10 分钟,持续 8 周。个性化 PLB 训练强度根据每位参与者的耐受程度调整吸气部分,同时强调呼气阶段,以确保将空气完全排出肺部。家庭肺活量干预方案的内容有效性很强,所有专家小组成员都达成了共识。项目级和量表级的内容效度指数(CVIs)达到了最高分 1.0,表明专家组对方案内容的评价具有高度的一致性和可信度:以证据为基础的最佳家庭 PLB 方案经过调整和开发,可用于管理慢性阻塞性肺病患者的健康相关结果。该方案是透明的,并得到了相关机制、具体证据、建议和专家共识的充分支持:在本研究中,我们就 "PLB 实践前的准备条件 "咨询了慢性阻塞性肺病患者,以确保采取适当措施预防慢性阻塞性肺病患者的潜在风险。此外,慢性阻塞性肺病患者也为公共小巴运动频率分布做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
期刊最新文献
Impact and Needs in Caregiving for Individuals With Dementia and Comorbid Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Living in Nursing Homes Improving Nursing Oral Care Practice for Community-Dwelling Care-Dependent Older People Issue Information The Experience of Hospitalisation for People Living With Dementia: A Qualitative Exploration of How Context Shapes Experiences Effects of Tactile Massage in Improving Older Residents' Psychological Health in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Randomised Controlled Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1