Unveiling CPR training challenges in nursing education: Pedagogical strategies for success

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104040
Masoomeh Habibi Baghi , Mahmood Abolghasemi , Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam , Morteza Rezaiezadeh , Mojtaba Vahidi Asl
{"title":"Unveiling CPR training challenges in nursing education: Pedagogical strategies for success","authors":"Masoomeh Habibi Baghi ,&nbsp;Mahmood Abolghasemi ,&nbsp;Masoumeh Zakerimoghadam ,&nbsp;Morteza Rezaiezadeh ,&nbsp;Mojtaba Vahidi Asl","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study explored the challenges nursing students face while learning CPR and identified experiential learning strategies to address these challenges.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nursing students often experience challenges and anxiety during clinical learning, including CPR training. Given the experimental nature of CPR training, experiential learning models like mARC can significantly enhance the learning experience by addressing these prevalent challenges.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This study adopts an interpretivist approach within a qualitative methodology and uses a phenomenological design.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews and the Delphi method were used to gather firsthand experiences from 37 educational supervisors, nursing professors and nursing students undergoing CPR clinical training at five public medical universities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Four main challenges and eighteen sub-challenges of CPR training were identified, elaborated and modeled. Additionally, thirteen experiential learning strategies, based on the mARC experiential learning model (more Authentic, Reflective, Collaborative), were mapped to address these challenges.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Among the four main challenges of CPR training identified by this study, the lack of pedagogy appears to be the underlying cause of the other three. This underscores the significance of integrating effective pedagogical approaches into nurse education strategies and initiatives.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001690/pdfft?md5=50a9544266fc511e31d17d8beb884877&pid=1-s2.0-S1471595324001690-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001690","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study explored the challenges nursing students face while learning CPR and identified experiential learning strategies to address these challenges.

Background

Nursing students often experience challenges and anxiety during clinical learning, including CPR training. Given the experimental nature of CPR training, experiential learning models like mARC can significantly enhance the learning experience by addressing these prevalent challenges.

Design

This study adopts an interpretivist approach within a qualitative methodology and uses a phenomenological design.

Method

Semi-structured interviews and the Delphi method were used to gather firsthand experiences from 37 educational supervisors, nursing professors and nursing students undergoing CPR clinical training at five public medical universities.

Results

Four main challenges and eighteen sub-challenges of CPR training were identified, elaborated and modeled. Additionally, thirteen experiential learning strategies, based on the mARC experiential learning model (more Authentic, Reflective, Collaborative), were mapped to address these challenges.

Conclusions

Among the four main challenges of CPR training identified by this study, the lack of pedagogy appears to be the underlying cause of the other three. This underscores the significance of integrating effective pedagogical approaches into nurse education strategies and initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示护理教育中心肺复苏培训的挑战:成功的教学策略。
目的:本研究探讨了护理专业学生在学习心肺复苏术时面临的挑战,并确定了应对这些挑战的体验式学习策略:背景:护理专业学生在临床学习(包括心肺复苏术培训)过程中经常会遇到挑战和焦虑。鉴于心肺复苏术培训的实验性质,像 mARC 这样的体验式学习模式可以通过解决这些普遍存在的挑战来显著增强学习体验:本研究采用定性方法中的解释学方法,并使用现象学设计:方法:采用半结构式访谈和德尔菲法,从五所公立医科大学的 37 名教育督导、护理教授和正在接受心肺复苏临床培训的护理学生那里收集第一手经验:结果:确定了心肺复苏培训的四个主要挑战和十八个次要挑战,并对其进行了阐述和示范。此外,还根据 mARC 体验式学习模式(更真实、更反思、更协作)绘制了十三种体验式学习策略,以应对这些挑战:在本研究确定的心肺复苏培训的四大挑战中,缺乏教学法似乎是其他三个挑战的根本原因。这强调了将有效的教学方法纳入护士教育战略和举措的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
“Removing the home court advantage”: A qualitative evaluation of LEGO® as an interprofessional simulation icebreaker for midwifery and medical students Does being involved in a research project enhance the postgraduate taught student experience: A qualitative research case study Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Simulation as a method in a supervision course, experiences of midwives and specialist nurses: A qualitative study Characteristics of nursing educators' professional competency standards: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1