Evaluation of interactive web-based tools to stimulate reflection and communication about advance care planning with people with dementia and their family caregivers.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Palliative Care Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1186/s12904-024-01486-4
Fanny Monnet, Lara Pivodic, Charlèss Dupont, Tinne Smets, Aline De Vleminck, Chantal Van Audenhove, Lieve Van den Block
{"title":"Evaluation of interactive web-based tools to stimulate reflection and communication about advance care planning with people with dementia and their family caregivers.","authors":"Fanny Monnet, Lara Pivodic, Charlèss Dupont, Tinne Smets, Aline De Vleminck, Chantal Van Audenhove, Lieve Van den Block","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01486-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People with dementia and their family caregivers often encounter challenges in engaging in advance care planning (ACP), such as a lack of information and difficulties in engaging in ACP conversations. Using a user-centred design, we developed two interactive web-based tools as part of an ACP support website to stimulate ACP reflection and communication: (1) the 'Thinking Now About Later' tool, with open-ended questions about 'what matters most', and (2) a digital version of the 'Life Wishes Cards', a card tool with pre-formulated statements that prompt reflection about wishes for future care. This study aimed to evaluate the use of and experiences with two web-based tools by people with dementia and their family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During an eight-week period, people with dementia and family caregivers were invited to use the ACP support website in the way they preferred. The mixed-methods evaluation of the ACP tools involved capturing log data to assess website use and semi-structured qualitative interviews to capture experiences. Analyses included descriptive statistics of log data and framework analysis for qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 52 participants, 21 people had dementia and 31 were family caregivers. The 'Thinking Now About Later' tool and 'Life Wishes Cards' were accessed 136 and 91 times respectively, with an average session duration of 14 minutes (SD = 27.45 minutes). 22 participants actively engaged with the tools, with the majority using the tools once, and seven revisiting them. Those who used the tools valued the guidance it provided for ACP conversations between people with dementia and their family caregivers. Participants reported that people with dementia experienced barriers to using the tools on their own, hence family caregivers usually facilitated the use and participation of people with dementia. Some highlighted not knowing what next steps to take after completing the tools online.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although less than half the people used the ACP tools, those who used them found them helpful to facilitate communication between people with dementia and their family. Family caregivers of people with dementia played a crucial role in facilitating the use of the web-based tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11212172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01486-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People with dementia and their family caregivers often encounter challenges in engaging in advance care planning (ACP), such as a lack of information and difficulties in engaging in ACP conversations. Using a user-centred design, we developed two interactive web-based tools as part of an ACP support website to stimulate ACP reflection and communication: (1) the 'Thinking Now About Later' tool, with open-ended questions about 'what matters most', and (2) a digital version of the 'Life Wishes Cards', a card tool with pre-formulated statements that prompt reflection about wishes for future care. This study aimed to evaluate the use of and experiences with two web-based tools by people with dementia and their family caregivers.

Methods: During an eight-week period, people with dementia and family caregivers were invited to use the ACP support website in the way they preferred. The mixed-methods evaluation of the ACP tools involved capturing log data to assess website use and semi-structured qualitative interviews to capture experiences. Analyses included descriptive statistics of log data and framework analysis for qualitative data.

Results: Of 52 participants, 21 people had dementia and 31 were family caregivers. The 'Thinking Now About Later' tool and 'Life Wishes Cards' were accessed 136 and 91 times respectively, with an average session duration of 14 minutes (SD = 27.45 minutes). 22 participants actively engaged with the tools, with the majority using the tools once, and seven revisiting them. Those who used the tools valued the guidance it provided for ACP conversations between people with dementia and their family caregivers. Participants reported that people with dementia experienced barriers to using the tools on their own, hence family caregivers usually facilitated the use and participation of people with dementia. Some highlighted not knowing what next steps to take after completing the tools online.

Conclusions: Although less than half the people used the ACP tools, those who used them found them helpful to facilitate communication between people with dementia and their family. Family caregivers of people with dementia played a crucial role in facilitating the use of the web-based tools.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对基于网络的互动工具进行评估,以激发痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者对预先护理计划的思考和交流。
背景:痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者在参与预先护理计划(ACP)时经常会遇到各种挑战,例如缺乏信息和难以参与 ACP 对话。我们采用以用户为中心的设计,开发了两种基于网络的互动工具,作为 ACP 支持网站的一部分,以促进 ACP 的反思和交流:(1)"现在思考以后 "工具,包含有关 "什么最重要 "的开放式问题;(2)数字版 "生活愿望卡",这是一种卡片工具,包含预先制定的语句,可促进对未来护理愿望的反思。本研究旨在评估痴呆症患者及其家庭照顾者使用这两种网络工具的情况和体验:在为期八周的时间里,痴呆症患者及其家庭护理者受邀以他们喜欢的方式使用 ACP 支持网站。对 ACP 工具进行的混合方法评估包括采集日志数据以评估网站使用情况,以及进行半结构化定性访谈以获取经验。分析包括日志数据的描述性统计和定性数据的框架分析:在 52 名参与者中,21 人患有痴呆症,31 人是家庭照顾者。现在想想以后 "工具和 "生活愿望卡 "分别被使用了 136 次和 91 次,平均使用时间为 14 分钟(SD = 27.45 分钟)。22 名参与者积极使用了这些工具,其中大多数人使用过一次,7 人再次使用。使用过工具的人都很重视工具为痴呆症患者与其家庭护理者之间的 ACP 对话提供的指导。参与者报告称,痴呆症患者在自行使用工具时会遇到障碍,因此家庭照护者通常会为痴呆症患者的使用和参与提供便利。一些人强调在完成在线工具后不知道下一步该采取什么措施:尽管只有不到一半的人使用过 ACP 工具,但使用过的人认为这些工具有助于促进痴呆症患者与家人之间的沟通。痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者在促进网络工具的使用方面发挥了至关重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
期刊最新文献
Experiences and access of palliative and end of life care for older people from minority ethnic groups: a scoping review Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers: Palliative Care services for women with HIV in resource-limited settings “I couldn’t say goodbye”: Thematic analysis of interviews with bereaved relatives who lost their loved ones during the COVID-19 pandemic Analyzing innovative policies and practices for palliative care in Portugal: a qualitative study End-of-life medical decisions in French overseas departments: results of a retrospective survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1