Research priorities of members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0691.R1
Imran Ahmed, Andrew Metcalfe, Paul Baker, Simon Ball, David Beard, Leela Biant, Mark Blyth, Chinmay Gupte, Caroline Hing, Stephen McDonnell, James Murray, Hemant Pandit, Andrew Price, Chloe Scott, Andrew Toms
{"title":"Research priorities of members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee.","authors":"Imran Ahmed, Andrew Metcalfe, Paul Baker, Simon Ball, David Beard, Leela Biant, Mark Blyth, Chinmay Gupte, Caroline Hing, Stephen McDonnell, James Murray, Hemant Pandit, Andrew Price, Chloe Scott, Andrew Toms","doi":"10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0691.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to identify the top unanswered research priorities in the field of knee surgery using consensus-based methodology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initial research questions were generated using an online survey sent to all 680 members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK). Duplicates were removed and a longlist was generated from this scoping exercise by a panel of 13 experts from across the UK who provided oversight of the process. A modified Delphi process was used to refine the questions and determine a final list. To rank the final list of questions, each question was scored between one (low importance) and ten (high importance) in order to produce the final list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This consensus exercise took place between December 2020 and April 2022. A total of 286 clinicians from the BASK membership provided input for the initial scoping exercise, which generated a list of 105 distinct research questions. Following review and prioritization, a longlist of 51 questions was sent out for two rounds of the Delphi process. A total of 42 clinicians responded to the first round and 24 responded to the second round. A final list of 24 research questions was then ranked by 36 clinicians. The topics included arthroplasty, infection, meniscus, osteotomy, patellofemoral, cartilage, and ligament pathologies. The management of early osteoarthritis was the highest-ranking question.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A Delphi exercise involving the BASK membership has identified the future research priorities in knee surgery. This list of questions will allow clinicians, researchers, and funders to collaborate in order to deliver high-quality research in knee surgery and further advance the care provided to patients with knee pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":48944,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Journal","volume":"106-B 7","pages":"662-668"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-0691.R1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to identify the top unanswered research priorities in the field of knee surgery using consensus-based methodology.

Methods: Initial research questions were generated using an online survey sent to all 680 members of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK). Duplicates were removed and a longlist was generated from this scoping exercise by a panel of 13 experts from across the UK who provided oversight of the process. A modified Delphi process was used to refine the questions and determine a final list. To rank the final list of questions, each question was scored between one (low importance) and ten (high importance) in order to produce the final list.

Results: This consensus exercise took place between December 2020 and April 2022. A total of 286 clinicians from the BASK membership provided input for the initial scoping exercise, which generated a list of 105 distinct research questions. Following review and prioritization, a longlist of 51 questions was sent out for two rounds of the Delphi process. A total of 42 clinicians responded to the first round and 24 responded to the second round. A final list of 24 research questions was then ranked by 36 clinicians. The topics included arthroplasty, infection, meniscus, osteotomy, patellofemoral, cartilage, and ligament pathologies. The management of early osteoarthritis was the highest-ranking question.

Conclusion: A Delphi exercise involving the BASK membership has identified the future research priorities in knee surgery. This list of questions will allow clinicians, researchers, and funders to collaborate in order to deliver high-quality research in knee surgery and further advance the care provided to patients with knee pathology.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国膝关节外科协会成员的研究重点。
目的:本研究旨在采用基于共识的方法确定膝关节外科领域尚未解决的首要研究问题:方法: 通过向英国膝关节外科协会(BASK)的所有 680 名会员发送在线调查问卷的方式提出初步研究问题。由来自英国各地的 13 位专家组成的小组对这一过程进行了监督,并从中产生了一份长名单。经过修改的德尔菲流程被用来完善问题并确定最终清单。为了对最终的问题清单进行排序,每个问题都在 1 分(重要性低)和 10 分(重要性高)之间打分,以得出最终清单:此次共识活动于 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 4 月期间进行。来自 BASK 成员的 286 名临床医生为初步范围界定工作提供了意见,并由此产生了一份包含 105 个不同研究问题的清单。经过审查和优先排序后,一份包含 51 个问题的长名单被送出进行两轮德尔菲过程。共有 42 名临床医生参与了第一轮讨论,24 人参与了第二轮讨论。随后,36 位临床医生对 24 个研究问题的最终清单进行了排序。这些问题包括关节成形术、感染、半月板、截骨术、髌股关节、软骨和韧带病变。早期骨关节炎的治疗是排名最高的问题:由 BASK 成员参与的德尔菲研究确定了膝关节手术的未来研究重点。这份问题清单将有助于临床医生、研究人员和资助者开展合作,以提供高质量的膝关节外科研究,并进一步推动对膝关节病变患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Journal
Bone & Joint Journal ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.90%
发文量
318
期刊介绍: We welcome original articles from any part of the world. The papers are assessed by members of the Editorial Board and our international panel of expert reviewers, then either accepted for publication or rejected by the Editor. We receive over 2000 submissions each year and accept about 250 for publication, many after revisions recommended by the reviewers, editors or statistical advisers. A decision usually takes between six and eight weeks. Each paper is assessed by two reviewers with a special interest in the subject covered by the paper, and also by members of the editorial team. Controversial papers will be discussed at a full meeting of the Editorial Board. Publication is between four and six months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Contemporary insights into spinopelvic mechanics. Core Outcome Domains for Elbow Replacement (CODER). Defining multilevel developmental cervical spinal stenosis using MRI. Delayed fixation of distal radial fractures beyond three weeks after initial failed closed reduction increases the odds of reoperation. Detection, classification, and characterization of proximal humerus fractures on plain radiographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1