Study of the impact of introducing a multimedia learning tool in podiatric medical courses.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1002/jfa2.12018
Garrik Hoyt, Samuel Adegboyega, Gus Constantouris, Paramita Basu
{"title":"Study of the impact of introducing a multimedia learning tool in podiatric medical courses.","authors":"Garrik Hoyt, Samuel Adegboyega, Gus Constantouris, Paramita Basu","doi":"10.1002/jfa2.12018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical students face the challenge of learning vast amounts of complex information. Existing research suggests improved learning outcomes using multimedia resources but reports on their impact on podiatric education are scarce. To explore the potential of multimedia-based learning tools in enriching medical education, this study examined the impact of Osmosis, a platform featuring interactive videos, flashcards, and self-assessment quizzes on podiatric medical student outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quasi-experimental study examined the impact of Osmosis, a multimedia learning platform with videos, flashcards, and quizzes, on podiatric medical students' learning outcomes. Two cohorts (T = Osmosis access, N = 86; C = no access, N = 87) took Pharmacology and Podiatric Medicine courses consecutively. Final exam scores, final course grades, platform usage metrics (median weekly videos watched, flashcards, and quizzes), and student experience surveys were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in final exam scores between the groups in Pharmacology and Podiatric Medicine. While the treatment group exhibited a slight upward trend, further research is required for conclusive evidence. Student perceptions of Osmosis were overwhelmingly positive, with 90.2% of students agreeing that it facilitated concept learning and understanding compared to 54.9% for the textbook. Similarly, 80.4% of the treatment group felt that Osmosis enhanced their test performance, exceeding the 54.9% recorded for the textbook. Correlation analysis indicates a plausible connection between platform usage and academic success, as reflected by moderate positive correlations (r = [0.14, 0.28]) with final grades. Logistic regression analysis revealed that students with Osmosis access were 2.88 times more likely to score 90% or higher on the Pharmacology final exam (p < 0.05) and exhibited increased odds of achieving high (90%+) final course grades in Podiatric Medicine (OR = 2.71).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that Osmosis holds promise as a tool to support podiatric medical student learning. While the lack of statistically significant differences in final exam scores warrants further investigation, the positive student perceptions, high engagement rates, and increased odds of high scores in specific areas indicate the potential for Osmosis to positively impact academic outcomes. Therefore, a multimedia-based resource like Osmosis appears to show promise as a tool to support podiatric medical education. The limitations inherent in the quasi-experimental design necessitate further studies to confirm its effectiveness and long-term impact on podiatric medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jfa2.12018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical students face the challenge of learning vast amounts of complex information. Existing research suggests improved learning outcomes using multimedia resources but reports on their impact on podiatric education are scarce. To explore the potential of multimedia-based learning tools in enriching medical education, this study examined the impact of Osmosis, a platform featuring interactive videos, flashcards, and self-assessment quizzes on podiatric medical student outcomes.

Methods: This quasi-experimental study examined the impact of Osmosis, a multimedia learning platform with videos, flashcards, and quizzes, on podiatric medical students' learning outcomes. Two cohorts (T = Osmosis access, N = 86; C = no access, N = 87) took Pharmacology and Podiatric Medicine courses consecutively. Final exam scores, final course grades, platform usage metrics (median weekly videos watched, flashcards, and quizzes), and student experience surveys were analyzed.

Results: Analyses revealed no statistically significant differences in final exam scores between the groups in Pharmacology and Podiatric Medicine. While the treatment group exhibited a slight upward trend, further research is required for conclusive evidence. Student perceptions of Osmosis were overwhelmingly positive, with 90.2% of students agreeing that it facilitated concept learning and understanding compared to 54.9% for the textbook. Similarly, 80.4% of the treatment group felt that Osmosis enhanced their test performance, exceeding the 54.9% recorded for the textbook. Correlation analysis indicates a plausible connection between platform usage and academic success, as reflected by moderate positive correlations (r = [0.14, 0.28]) with final grades. Logistic regression analysis revealed that students with Osmosis access were 2.88 times more likely to score 90% or higher on the Pharmacology final exam (p < 0.05) and exhibited increased odds of achieving high (90%+) final course grades in Podiatric Medicine (OR = 2.71).

Conclusions: These findings suggest that Osmosis holds promise as a tool to support podiatric medical student learning. While the lack of statistically significant differences in final exam scores warrants further investigation, the positive student perceptions, high engagement rates, and increased odds of high scores in specific areas indicate the potential for Osmosis to positively impact academic outcomes. Therefore, a multimedia-based resource like Osmosis appears to show promise as a tool to support podiatric medical education. The limitations inherent in the quasi-experimental design necessitate further studies to confirm its effectiveness and long-term impact on podiatric medical education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究在足科医学课程中引入多媒体学习工具的影响。
背景:医科学生面临着学习大量复杂信息的挑战。现有研究表明,使用多媒体资源可以提高学习效果,但有关其对足病教育影响的报告却很少。为了探索基于多媒体的学习工具在丰富医学教育方面的潜力,本研究考察了Osmosis(一个以互动视频、闪存卡和自我评估测验为特色的平台)对足科医学生学习成果的影响:这项准实验研究考察了Osmosis(一个包含视频、闪存卡和测验的多媒体学习平台)对足科医科学生学习成果的影响。两组学生(T = Osmosis access,N = 86;C = no access,N = 87)连续学习了药理学和足病学课程。对期末考试成绩、最终课程成绩、平台使用指标(每周观看视频、闪存卡和测验的中位数)以及学生体验调查进行了分析:分析结果显示,药理学和足病学两组学生的期末考试成绩在统计学上没有明显差异。虽然治疗组的成绩略有上升趋势,但还需要进一步研究才能得出结论。学生对 Osmosis 的看法非常积极,90.2% 的学生认为它促进了概念的学习和理解,而对教科书的看法只有 54.9%。同样,80.4%的治疗组学生认为 Osmosis 提高了他们的考试成绩,超过了教科书的 54.9%。相关性分析表明,平台的使用与学业成绩之间存在合理的联系,这体现在平台的使用与最终成绩之间存在中等程度的正相关性(r = [0.14, 0.28])。逻辑回归分析表明,使用 Osmosis 的学生在药理学期末考试中获得 90% 或更高分数的可能性是使用 Osmosis 的学生的 2.88 倍(p 结论):这些研究结果表明,Osmosis 有希望成为支持足科医科学生学习的工具。虽然期末考试成绩在统计上没有显著差异,但学生的积极看法、高参与率以及在特定领域获得高分的几率增加,都表明 Osmosis 有可能对学术成果产生积极影响。因此,像 Osmosis 这样基于多媒体的资源似乎有望成为支持足病医学教育的工具。由于准实验设计的固有局限性,有必要进行进一步的研究,以确认其有效性以及对足病医学教育的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
期刊最新文献
Study of the impact of introducing a multimedia learning tool in podiatric medical courses. Exploring the psychosocial burden of foot complications in diabetes: A cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study in a United Kingdom coastal community. Textured insoles may improve some gross motor balance measures but not endurance measures in children with motor coordination issues. A randomised controlled feasibility trial. Development of a research agenda for medical grade footwear in the Netherlands: A multidisciplinary multiphase project to determine the key research questions to advance scientific knowledge in the field. Peri-ankle muscles architecture and performance changes in patients with chronic ankle instability: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1