Families' Perspectives on Social Services Navigation After Pediatric Urgent Care.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230232R2
Alison Aronstam, Denisse Velazquez, Holly Wing, Danielle Hessler, Victoria F Keeton, Karen Sokal-Gutierrez, Laura M Gottlieb
{"title":"Families' Perspectives on Social Services Navigation After Pediatric Urgent Care.","authors":"Alison Aronstam, Denisse Velazquez, Holly Wing, Danielle Hessler, Victoria F Keeton, Karen Sokal-Gutierrez, Laura M Gottlieb","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230232R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interest is growing in clinic-based programs that screen for and intervene on patients' social risk factors, including housing, food, and transportation. Though several studies suggest these programs can positively impact health, few examine the mechanisms underlying these effects. This study explores pathways through which identifying and intervening on social risks can impact families' health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study was embedded in a randomized clinical trial that examined the health impacts of participation in a social services navigation program. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 English or Spanish-speaking caregivers of pediatric patients who had participated in the navigation program. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers described 3 pathways through which the navigation program affected overall child and/or caregiver health: 1) increasing families' knowledge of and access to social services; 2) helping families connect with health care services; and 3) providing emotional support that reduced caregiver isolation and anxiety. Participants suggested that navigation programs can influence health even when they do not directly impact resource access.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Social care programs may impact health through multiple potential pathways. Program impacts seem to be mediated by the extent to which programs increase knowledge of and access to social and health care services and support positive relationships between families and program personnel.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"479-486"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230232R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interest is growing in clinic-based programs that screen for and intervene on patients' social risk factors, including housing, food, and transportation. Though several studies suggest these programs can positively impact health, few examine the mechanisms underlying these effects. This study explores pathways through which identifying and intervening on social risks can impact families' health.

Methods: This qualitative study was embedded in a randomized clinical trial that examined the health impacts of participation in a social services navigation program. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 27 English or Spanish-speaking caregivers of pediatric patients who had participated in the navigation program. Interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results: Caregivers described 3 pathways through which the navigation program affected overall child and/or caregiver health: 1) increasing families' knowledge of and access to social services; 2) helping families connect with health care services; and 3) providing emotional support that reduced caregiver isolation and anxiety. Participants suggested that navigation programs can influence health even when they do not directly impact resource access.

Discussion: Social care programs may impact health through multiple potential pathways. Program impacts seem to be mediated by the extent to which programs increase knowledge of and access to social and health care services and support positive relationships between families and program personnel.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭对儿科急诊后社会服务导航的看法。
背景:人们对以诊所为基础、筛查并干预患者社会风险因素(包括住房、食物和交通)的项目越来越感兴趣。虽然一些研究表明这些项目能对健康产生积极影响,但很少有人研究这些影响的内在机制。本研究探讨了识别和干预社会风险可影响家庭健康的途径:这项定性研究是一项随机临床试验的一部分,旨在研究参与社会服务导航计划对健康的影响。我们对参加过导航项目的 27 名儿科患者的英语或西班牙语护理人员进行了半结构化访谈。我们采用主题分析法对访谈进行了分析:照顾者描述了导航计划影响儿童和/或照顾者整体健康的三个途径:1)增加家庭对社会服务的了解和获得社会服务的机会;2)帮助家庭联系医疗保健服务;3)提供情感支持,减少照顾者的孤独感和焦虑感。与会者认为,即使导航计划不直接影响资源的获取,也能影响健康:讨论:社会关怀项目可通过多种潜在途径影响健康。项目的影响似乎受以下因素的影响:项目在多大程度上增加了对社会和医疗保健服务的了解和获取途径,并支持家庭与项目人员之间的积极关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1