Opioid Dose Reductions by Sex and Race in a Cohort of Patients in a Family Medicine Clinic.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2023.230220R2
Mechelle Sanders, Kevin Fiscella, Mathew Devine, Jefferson Hunter, Yasin Mohamed, Colleen T Fogarty
{"title":"Opioid Dose Reductions by Sex and Race in a Cohort of Patients in a Family Medicine Clinic.","authors":"Mechelle Sanders, Kevin Fiscella, Mathew Devine, Jefferson Hunter, Yasin Mohamed, Colleen T Fogarty","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2023.230220R2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 2022 Centers for Disease Control's \"Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Pain in United States\" called for attention and action toward reducing disparities in untreated and undertreated pain among Black and Latino patients. There is growing evidence for controlled substance safety committees (CSSC) to change prescribing culture, but few have been examined through the lens of health equity. We examined the impact of a primary care CSSC on opioid prescribing, including by patients' race and sex.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Our primary outcome was a change in prescribed morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at baseline (2017) and follow-up (2021). We compared the differences in MME by race and sex. We also examined potential intersectional disparities. We used paired <i>t</i> test to compare changes in mean MME's and logistic regression to determine associations between patient characteristics and MME changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our cohort included 93 patients. The mean opioid dose decreased from nearly 200 MME to 136.1 MME, <i>P</i> < .0001. Thirty percent of patients had their dose reduced to under 90 MME by follow-up. The reduction rates by race or sex alone were not statistically significant. There was evidence of intersectional disparities at baseline. Black women were prescribed 88.5 fewer MME's at baseline compared with their White men counterparts, <i>P</i> = .04.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings add to the previously documented success of CSSCs in reducing opioid doses for chronic nonmalignant pain to safer levels. We highlight an opportunity for primary care based CSSCs to lead the efforts to identify and address chronic pain management inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"383-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2023.230220R2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2022 Centers for Disease Control's "Clinical Practice Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Pain in United States" called for attention and action toward reducing disparities in untreated and undertreated pain among Black and Latino patients. There is growing evidence for controlled substance safety committees (CSSC) to change prescribing culture, but few have been examined through the lens of health equity. We examined the impact of a primary care CSSC on opioid prescribing, including by patients' race and sex.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Our primary outcome was a change in prescribed morphine milligram equivalents (MME) at baseline (2017) and follow-up (2021). We compared the differences in MME by race and sex. We also examined potential intersectional disparities. We used paired t test to compare changes in mean MME's and logistic regression to determine associations between patient characteristics and MME changes.

Results: Our cohort included 93 patients. The mean opioid dose decreased from nearly 200 MME to 136.1 MME, P < .0001. Thirty percent of patients had their dose reduced to under 90 MME by follow-up. The reduction rates by race or sex alone were not statistically significant. There was evidence of intersectional disparities at baseline. Black women were prescribed 88.5 fewer MME's at baseline compared with their White men counterparts, P = .04.

Discussion: Our findings add to the previously documented success of CSSCs in reducing opioid doses for chronic nonmalignant pain to safer levels. We highlight an opportunity for primary care based CSSCs to lead the efforts to identify and address chronic pain management inequities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
按性别和种族分列的全科诊所患者阿片类药物剂量减少情况。
背景:2022 年,美国疾病控制中心发布了《美国疼痛处方阿片类药物临床实践指南》,呼吁关注并采取行动减少黑人和拉丁裔患者中疼痛未治疗和治疗不足的差距。越来越多的证据表明,受管制物质安全委员会(CSSC)可以改变处方文化,但很少有委员会从健康公平的角度进行研究。我们研究了初级保健 CSSC 对阿片类药物处方的影响,包括对患者种族和性别的影响:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们的主要研究结果是基线(2017 年)和随访(2021 年)时处方吗啡毫克当量(MME)的变化。我们比较了不同种族和性别处方吗啡毫克当量的差异。我们还研究了潜在的交叉差异。我们使用配对 t 检验来比较平均 MME 的变化,并使用逻辑回归来确定患者特征与 MME 变化之间的关联:我们的队列包括 93 名患者。阿片类药物的平均剂量从近 200 兆克降至 136.1 兆克,P .30%的患者在随访期间将阿片类药物的剂量减少到了 90 毫克/毫升以下。单从种族或性别来看,剂量减少率并无统计学意义。有证据表明,基线存在交叉差异。黑人女性与白人男性相比,基线剂量减少了 88.5 MME(P = .04):我们的研究结果进一步证实了 CSSCs 成功地将慢性非恶性疼痛的阿片类药物剂量降低到了更安全的水平。我们强调,以初级保健为基础的 CSSC 有机会领导识别和解决慢性疼痛管理不平等问题的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
期刊最新文献
Answering the "100 Most Important Family Medicine Research Questions" from the 1985 Hames Consortium. CERA: A Vehicle for Facilitating Research in Family Medicine. Current and Future Challenges to Publishing Family Medicine Research. Diversity in Family Medicine Research. Leveraging the All of Us Database for Primary Care Research with Large Datasets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1